Channel
@VenusQueen2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,338subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001432985162 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VenusQueen2 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VenusQueen2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 4,338 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:10 | 4,331 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 4,330 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (2 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,756 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
97 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 40.2% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 40.2% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 8.25% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 6.19% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 2.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The upcoming inflation data will be important for the markets whether the FED will increase the rates or pause again. Last time the FED increased the rates was back in July 2023! You can see the dates below in the table. Seasonally, usually in midterm years, August-October is red. Let's see how it plays out, the next few months will be important for the markets!
❤3
Michael Saylor's Strategy (#MSTR) sold 1,637 BTC over the past week, reducing its Bitcoin holdings to 842,138 BTC. 1,637BTC which is worth around 102M, they intend to sell up to 5B$ worth of $BTC over the coming months.
👍4❤2
I know people love visuals/charts. Basically it would look something like this. $BTC usually likes 3 drives as pointed on the chart. I do believe the last dump will mark the cycle low. It''s getting harder to push the price lower. We're close guys.
❤7👍2
Would fit well with the thesis about the final dump into the cycle low, Saylor selling more $BTC along with stock market correction after a decent upside move going into the midterms.
👍2
JUST IN: Michael Saylor's Strategy authorizes plans to sell up to $5 billion in Bitcoin. @WatcherGuru
👀2❤1
SUMMARY OF FED DECISION (7/29/2026): 1. Fed leaves rates unchanged for the 5th straight meeting 2. Fed votes 9-3 to hold benchmark rate in 3.50%-3.75% zone 3. Hammack, Kashkari, and Logan dissent in favor of rate hike 4. Fed says economic activity is expanding at a "solid pace" despite uncertainty 5. Fed says job gains have "kept pace with the workforce" 6. Fed says it remains committed to its 2% inflation goal…
👍3
BREAKING: Michael Saylor's 'Strategy' sold 3,588 Bitcoin worth $225 million. @WatcherGuru
$BTC Bounce on $BTC to 70K is possible probably this month, but still expecting new lows overall, especially as we get close to the end of the Summer. This will still take months to play out, liquidate longs, absorb spot sell pressure, etc. Retail losses mind, cries and whales keep filling their bags in the accumulation range, that's how it works, whales move the market. They will test your emotions and patience, …
👍10
$BTC Some of you might remember this chart, we are basically coming to the final stages of the bear market. As you can see, it's playing out in very similar style like the previous bear market. I do think we get on more sweep of the low in the coming months, whether it is 40K or 50K, should be good value for the next cycle. Will update again when I think we are at around the bottom and will share some projects wh…
💯8❤6👍1
BREAKING: Elon Musk's SpaceX $SPCX officially begins trading at $2 trillion market cap following IPO. @WatcherGuru
❤4
https://x.com/VenusQueen19/status/2064759795668963683?s=20
❤4
Still holding all my $VEILNET irrespective of horrible price action ever since $BTC dumped. Let’s hope it will reverse soon. Team is releasing updates. Let’s hope they have marketing plans to reverse the chart.
👍7❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @VenusQueen2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 318,342 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VenusQueen & Friends” (@VenusQueen2), 4,338 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VenusQueen2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.