Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Eric Cryptomans Journal

@erics_calls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,075subscribers

-99 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001381024355
TypeChannel
Username@erics_calls
DescriptionA channel of some of my meme coin plays, long-term investments & leverage trades. Nothing in this channel is financial advice. DM @EricCryptoman if you have alpha and I may listen.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/erics_calls

Growth

31,07531,17431,124.56 August 2026 — 31,174 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,174 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,172 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,165 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,134 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,129 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,124 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,107 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,102 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,075 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,060–31,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:2531,075-27
13 Aug 2026, 03:2631,102-5
12 Aug 2026, 02:4331,107-17
11 Aug 2026, 02:3231,124-5
10 Aug 2026, 01:2131,129-5
9 Aug 2026, 03:1131,134-31
7 Aug 2026, 23:4731,165-7
6 Aug 2026, 22:4131,172-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:1531,174no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:0531,174first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.54%
avg views ÷ 31,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,970
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total23,720
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,600
Videos
74
Links
1,820

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 14 August 2026

https://x.com/McCaque/status/2084686355221643555?s=20 Better than my HODL thread, if you want a deep dive in a coin I believe can (actually) 100-1000x if the right people find it, read this.

4 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,980 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Cute 50% pump so far on buttcoin, wake me up when it's 10-100x please and thank you. https://x.com/ButtCoin/status/2084329982126649476?s=20

2 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈2,330 viewsread 14 August 2026

https://x.com/ericcryptoman/status/2083858511419596845?s=46 Do you have the patience to hold until peak bull cycle? Willing to bet 95% doesn’t. I’ve held coins for 1-3 years many times, but I come from a different era where we believed in things.

29 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC≈3,220 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Have you ever played Runescape?

  1. Yes, still play12%
  2. Used to play33%
  3. Never played57%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC≈3,000 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

BOTTOM for $Buttcoin (pardon the pun) Sub $10m to 9 figure run will be obvious in hind sight Cm6fNnMk7NfzStP9CZpsQA2v3jjzbcYGAxdJySmHpump

25 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC≈4,040 viewsread 14 August 2026

If this was 2021, it would of already ran to top 100. GM ran to 600m. Fake HODL coins did 200m+ Sadly it's 2026, and the market conditions are pretty devastating for believers (of which we built our entire net worth, X + Telegram on doing, holding 100-1000xs publicly) However, if you believe that believing will come back, there is no better coin on the entire market.

25 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈3,540 viewsread 14 August 2026

A lot of people asking me if I'm still in HODL - so making it very clear I am still 100% in my HODL position (actually been adding more the whole time). Even debating locking up half of my tokens until 100m market cap. Might be delusion, but I also think most of the market is completely offside on this trade. HODL is the biggest & most used meme word/term in all of crypto, so large it ascended crypto and moved int

9 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTC≈5,500 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Did you know Robinhood had it's own chain and the founder, Vlad is publicly supporting memes?

  1. No19%
  2. Yes, but haven't bridged36%
  3. Yes, I'm trading there47%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC≈5,430 viewsread 14 August 2026

https://x.com/EricCryptoman/status/2072645901521129679 big one

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @erics_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTCAnonymous Poll380 voters

Have you ever played Runescape?

  1. Yes, still play12%
  2. Used to play33%
  3. Never played57%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTCAnonymous Poll660 voters

Did you know Robinhood had it's own chain and the founder, Vlad is publicly supporting memes?

  1. No19%
  2. Yes, but haven't bridged36%
  3. Yes, I'm trading there47%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jun 2026, 12:57 UTCAnonymous Poll667 voters

When did you first get into crypto?

  1. Pre 2018 (Veteran)30%
  2. Pre 2021 (OG)48%
  3. Pre 2024 (Battle tested)16%
  4. Post 2024 (New)7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 261,613 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 193,483
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub · 171,982
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Eric Cryptomans Journal” (@erics_calls), 31,075 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/erics_calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.