Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Eric Cryptomans Journal

Channel

Eric Cryptomans Journal

@erics_calls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,296subscribers

+122 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001381024355
TypeChannel
Username@erics_calls
DescriptionA channel of some of my meme coin plays, long-term investments & leverage trades. Nothing in this channel is financial advice. DM @EricCryptoman if you have alpha and I may listen.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/erics_calls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,85031,32631,0886 August 2026 — 31,174 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,174 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,172 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,165 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,134 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,129 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,124 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,107 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,102 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,075 subscribers15 August 2026 — 31,047 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,019 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,994 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,972 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,941 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,926 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,897 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,867 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,860 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,852 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,850 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,856 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,893 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,889 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,928 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,956 subscribers3 September 2026 — 31,024 subscribers4 September 2026 — 31,094 subscribers7 September 2026 — 31,248 subscribers10 September 2026 — 31,302 subscribers12 September 2026 — 31,314 subscribers14 September 2026 — 31,326 subscribers16 September 2026 — 31,302 subscribers18 September 2026 — 31,286 subscribers24 September 2026 — 31,296 subscribers31,2966 August 202624 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net +122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,779–31,397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 20:5931,296+10
18 Sept 2026, 19:5731,286-16
16 Sept 2026, 08:4031,302-24
14 Sept 2026, 11:1931,326+12
12 Sept 2026, 19:2031,314+12
10 Sept 2026, 20:5931,302+54
7 Sept 2026, 18:1831,248+154
4 Sept 2026, 21:1531,094+70
3 Sept 2026, 04:1731,024+68
2 Sept 2026, 00:3630,956+28
31 Aug 2026, 21:0830,928+39
30 Aug 2026, 18:1830,889-4
29 Aug 2026, 21:0430,893+37
28 Aug 2026, 23:3730,856+6
27 Aug 2026, 20:0230,850-2
26 Aug 2026, 19:3630,852-8
25 Aug 2026, 16:4230,860-7
24 Aug 2026, 13:1330,867-30
22 Aug 2026, 23:0430,897-29
21 Aug 2026, 12:3730,926first reading

Engagement

124 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.19%
avg views ÷ 31,296 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,560
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
89
of 124 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held124 (1 June 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total228,060
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,670
Videos
≈74
Links
≈1,890

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 14:42 UTC≈8,890 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

$100m+ coin trading at $4m cap. The final OPTIMUS. Already had 1 Elon reply to the account which caused the $12m candle - now imagine if he follows or RTs. FLOKI ran to $3.5b from 2 elon tweets. Optimus is going to get 100s. Easiest buy & hold. Their X page has blown up to 21.2k followers in a month, on route for 100k+ end of year. This is the best OPTIMUS content on all of X, and Elon is going to love it: https:…

24 Sept 2026, 17:17 UTC≈16,300 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

The STONK/PONS of Ethereum is still sub 10m cap btw. Pretty nice test pump today though. Early signs of a return to main net.... People often overlook it but forget Ethereum TVL stands at $55B. Robinhood is $1B. Sol is $6B. https://sender.family/ 0x47ACCD13264D8F954105256FaaC8376ce6A55999

24 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC≈2,390 viewsread 28 September 2026

https://x.com/EricCryptoman/status/2103083272205152256?s=20

23 Sept 2026, 14:04 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

This was only announced yday btw and Coinbase posted iguanas on their insta… Free $ narra

23 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC≈4,440 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

FOMO updating the pic shortly should be insta 10m candle when it’s updated

23 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,340 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Aped @brian_armstrong pet iguana at 3m cap, about time @base had a 100m+ runner. 0xb20000000000000000000070f6c1a66d7c1e4d01 $SPIKE 10% off fees: https://fomo.family/r/EricCryptoman

22 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

The $CASHCAT of @arc is still available sub $3m btw. The #1 meme on chain by every metric > market cap, holders, volume, organic engagement & relevance. $USDC - 0x8e98a62a995a50eca9979bfa016f91bf36a8f9d9 Trade with me on fomo for 10% off fees: https://fomo.family/r/EricCryptoman

21 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC≈2,550 viewsread 28 September 2026

https://x.com/EricCryptoman/status/2102071135399530548?s=20

20 Sept 2026, 22:48 UTC≈4,280 viewsread 28 September 2026

https://x.com/EricCryptoman/status/2101805098389143900?s=20

19 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC≈3,040 viewsread 28 September 2026

https://x.com/ericcryptoman/status/2101250333640896601?s=46 $1000 giveaway for the bros

Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @erics_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTCAnonymous Poll392 voters

Have you ever played Runescape?

  1. Yes, still play12%
  2. Used to play33%
  3. Never played57%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTCAnonymous Poll664 voters

Did you know Robinhood had it's own chain and the founder, Vlad is publicly supporting memes?

  1. No20%
  2. Yes, but haven't bridged36%
  3. Yes, I'm trading there47%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jun 2026, 12:57 UTCAnonymous Poll671 voters

When did you first get into crypto?

  1. Pre 2018 (Veteran)30%
  2. Pre 2021 (OG)48%
  3. Pre 2024 (Battle tested)16%
  4. Post 2024 (New)7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906
#1
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
#2
Noodles 2025 Market Intelligence Event
@noodlestrade · 6,372
#3
Noodles Research
@Noodles_calls · 11,770
#4
Chad Crypto
@Chad_Crypto · 16,061
#5
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,463
#6
Kingdom of X100 CALLS
@Kingdom_X100_CALLS · 18,678
#7
Jamie's Cave👨🏻‍💻
@jamiescave · 13,455
#8
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,984
#9
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,884
#10
Kaduna Degen Channel (NFA)
@DegenKaduna · 9,616
#11
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,740
#12
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 41,000
#13
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 19,096
#14
wat is des
@watisdes · 30,055
#15
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,890
#16
The Tribunal Court of Defi
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,901
#17
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 35,539
#18
Iceberg Casino - Uniswap Villain
@TheIcebergCasino · 3,415
#19
Luffy’s diary
@Luffysgemcalls · 11,014
#20
KVON ❤️‍🔥 REKT ARC
@kvontrades · 3,577
#21
Kanye's Greatest Hits
@KanyesGreatestHits · 5,330
#22
Cautious bull run enjoyers
@smolinsanity · 14,307
#23
Neo Calls
@NeoCallss · 17,483
#24
CF Market Updates and Analysis
@CF_MarketWatch · 1,760
#25
Degen Divers🏮
@degendivers · 3,322
#26
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 16,074
#27
KOBE'S CALLS
@KobesCalls · 17,946
#28
Kazi's Gem Farm
@KazisGemFarm · 7,596
#29
Agaricus bisporus (Louis)
@LouisCooperCrypto · 3,899
#30
Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub · 166,826
#31
VenusQueen & Friends
@VenusQueen2 · 4,294
#32
Astral’s Gambles 🎲 (DEGEN-ARC)
@ASTRAL_GAMBLES · 3,336
#33
eezzy’s degen journal
@eezzydegenjournal · 12,992
#34
Downsin's Monke Cage
@MonkeCage · 11,184
#35
Sapphire Call’s
@SapphireCalls · 12,394
#36
Moneymancalls
@moneymancalls1104 · 10,585
#37
Reaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 15,286
#38
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 36,178
#39
The Don's Calls
@TheDonsCalls · 12,866
#40
1000𝕏 Multi Chain
@MultiChain1000x · 9,485
#41
LucasApe.eth degen calls
@lucasapeeth · 6,347
#42
Cryptic MoonShots | @CryptiCMS
@CryptiCMS · 4,156
#43
BIZONACCI GEMS 💎
@BizonacciGems · 1,648
#44
Dream Calls 100x
@DreamCalls100x · 10,755
#45
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,453
#46
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,723
#47
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 53,804
#48
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,693
#49
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,516
#50
Gems of Ra 💎👁‍🗨
@GemsofRa · 17,791
#51
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 32,859
#52
Hopium Casino
@HopiumCasino · 14,368
#53
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 47,200
#54
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,892
#55
CTM Calls
@CryptoTalkManZone · 10,664
#56
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,686
#57
Diary of Apes | α |
@diaryofapes · 4,654
#58
DEGEN GEMS! REKT’S Crypto Journey
@degenshit100x · 5,843
#59
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 38,003
#60
Stuff im (Penn) buying
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,341
#61
Hatori Investments
@hatoriinvestments · 8,859
#62
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,671
#63
Shitcoin Guru
@shitco1nguru · 3,378
#64
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,355
#65
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 80,140
#66
Senzu Gambles
@senzugambles · 1,873
#67
Pswole Plays - One Thumb to Rule Them All
@pswoleplays · 4,156
#68
€urosniper Degen
@EurosniperDegen · 5,315
#69
0xEly's Early Calls
@earlycallsby0xEly · 8,643
#70
Iced's Inbred HQ
@inbredhq · 7,289
#71
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 81,728
#72
Killer's 😈
@KillersCalls69 · 4,288
#73
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,271
#74
CaesarsCalls
@Caesars_Calls · 39,248
#75
Gay calls only, buy if ur gay.
@wifechangingcallss · 6,256
#76
Joe 420 Calls
@Joe420Calls · 7,165
#77
The Don’s Degens
@degensgems · 15,169
#78
Zoomer News
@ZoomerfiedNews · 22,446
#79
iToken - Ethereum
@iTokenEthereum · 16,002
#80
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,416
#81
DonkTALK(OLD)
@Donkey_Calls · 1,055
#82
iReview
@IndyReviews · 4,305
#83
macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈
@teammacnbtc · 32,872
#84

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 188,094
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
IONIC XBT
@theionicxbtt · 23,588
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub · 166,826
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈
@teammacnbtc · 32,872
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Investigations by ZachXBT
@investigations · 107,566
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,453
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Insider Calls
@inside_calls · 25,082
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 32,859
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
don’t bet the house
@dontbetthehouse · 26,200
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Koroush AK 👁
@koroush_ak_tg · 44,523
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Eric Cryptomans Journal” (@erics_calls), 31,296 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/erics_calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.