Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Degen Seals

Channel

Degen Seals

@DegenSeals

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,123subscribers

+279 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001523523939
TypeChannel
Username@DegenSeals
DescriptionDegen memecoin posts (SOL, Base, BSC, ETH & more). Risky. NFA. 🦭Degen Seals Fam (make sure to check @): - Contact/manage: @Wakame8 & @tqsully - Calls: @SealsPrincessa @Wakame8 @F4dedd - Other Groups: @ShillSeals & @GambleLounge - Founder: @tqsully
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DegenSeals

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@DegenSeals/17909 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC@Defidoxxcalls/33537 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC1.0072 seconds
@DegenSeals/17975 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC@Defidoxxcalls/339612 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC1.0030 minutes
@DegenSeals/17978 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC@Defidoxxcalls/339813 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC1.002.3 hours
@DegenSeals/17994 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC@Defidoxxcalls/341316 Aug 2026, 02:06 UTC1.008.5 hours
@DegenSeals/18119 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC@Defidoxxcalls/348625 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@DegenSeals/18326 · this entry6 Sept 2026, 08:07 UTC@Defidoxxcalls/35966 Sept 2026, 10:46 UTC1.002.6 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Defidoxxcalls36 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hoursthis entry (36–0)
@zeus_gem33 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.7 hoursthis entry (32–1)
@mayerscallz23 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.991.7 hoursthis entry (23–0)
@takanaeth10118 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005.0 hoursthis entry (18–0)
@Zeusgambles16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.998.3 hoursthis entry (16–0)
@minidraftgamble11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0022 minutesthis entry (11–0)
@LiamsGemCalls10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 minutesthis entry (10–0)
@VitaIikCalls10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (10–0)
@DEFI_WHALES_CHINISE_CALLS9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005.1 hoursthis entry (9–0)
@Big_Whale_call9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.8 hoursthis entry (9–0)
@fuddles_studio_calls7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.991.6 hoursthis entry (7–0)
@pandacallslonge36 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.975.9 hoursthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 434 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @DegenSeals — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

33,69134,34134,01634,1237 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net +279. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,594–34,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:5534,123-18
10 Nov 2026, 03:2134,141-31
8 Nov 2026, 18:5134,172-13
7 Nov 2026, 09:2634,185-9
6 Nov 2026, 12:2134,194-1
5 Nov 2026, 12:3934,195-2
4 Nov 2026, 11:3934,197-5
3 Nov 2026, 10:3634,202+2
2 Nov 2026, 08:1534,200-1
1 Nov 2026, 07:5134,201+26
31 Oct 2026, 08:3534,175+31
30 Oct 2026, 08:4934,144+38
29 Oct 2026, 06:5534,106-21
28 Oct 2026, 02:0134,127-4
27 Oct 2026, 03:5734,131-4
26 Oct 2026, 01:4734,135-1
25 Oct 2026, 04:1734,136-12
24 Oct 2026, 07:4034,148-16
23 Oct 2026, 06:1034,164-4
22 Oct 2026, 08:3834,168first reading

Engagement

876 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.71%
avg views ÷ 34,123 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,610
216 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
216
of 876 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held876 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total347,468
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 06:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈14,800
Videos
≈41
Links
≈8,040

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 18 of 216 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 03:49 UTC531 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🪙 $Mori Aped some here, so it is launched by https://x.com/pavankat this guy. An Early C-level (CTO/CLO) at Trilogy Education Services which he scaled to a $750M exit in 2019. Technical architect at Consensys (smart contracts, oracles). Active options trader since 2020 (covered calls/puts on BTC/ETH via LedgerX; early DAI market-making around depegs). Angel investor (pavan.vc). MoR1whCWjcLiUqAan4GHLRcn8wK4Jktk2…

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

14 Nov 2026, 01:11 UTC727 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔸 $SWJ Stand with Jansen, aped this some. This is going helluva viral right now even Yihe, Elon musk have signed it already. 0x26040E441a7369cCC7bD8bfE96F596DF4dB87777

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Nov 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔸 $AIOT This kinda still reversing pretty good from the absolute bottom.

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🪙 $Fastmoon Touched 400k almost 2xsa since the call. 🌺🌺

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Nov 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,400 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🪙 $Fastmoon Aping some here, Safemoon kinda narra on Solana here recalling that dead dead markets. And rn market again gloomy so we need a runner here pls. 2QCcwbZL7YgovUqvXmxoKJR8AZoHeGMtt4vj2YGSpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/91j8wtxydwavc6ijnfqu9igg4jby49wpp8s2xz3ufpxy

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔸 $Jacket Why what who candling it 😂😂

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Nov 2026, 03:28 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

$BTC well, may be its time to visit the range high area again ;)

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

12 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🪙 $AMD This one making some reversal.

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

12 Nov 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🪙 $STANK Stank ca is added to the source code of the fartcoin website, so getting some volume from bottom. It opens view-source:https://fart.dev

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

12 Nov 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

https://x.com/zoomerfied/status/2120876508680183847

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

12 Nov 2026, 06:50 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔵 $Revvy Not bad, did 3xsa for us overnight.

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

11 Nov 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🌐 $Pocket Going pretty nice, smashes 2M ath.

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

Showing the 12 most recent of 876 posts we hold for @DegenSeals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@DegenSeals edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 September 2026
Most recent edit
21 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @DegenSeals as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
29 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 110,922
#1
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 35,456
#2
wat is des
@watisdes · 29,824
#3
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,250
#4
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,084
#5
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,555
#6
Neo Calls
@NeoCallss · 17,514
#7
Reaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 14,002
#8
Dream Calls 100x
@DreamCalls100x · 11,644
#9
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 34,692
#10
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 28,420
#11
The Don’s Degens
@degensgems · 14,828
#12
Gubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,777
#13
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,047
#14
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,173
#15
The Tribunal Court of Defi
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,759
#16
- SOL -
@lowtaxsolana · 38,563
#17
Shyroshi Gambles
@SHYROSHIGAMBLES · 24,148
#18
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,694
#19
Crafty Gambles
@CraftyGambles · 10,817
#20
The Blockchain God's Gambles
@TBGgambLes · 5,565
#21
KOBE'S CALLS
@KobesCalls · 17,530
#22
Brainstorm Alphas
@BrainstormAlphas · 6,190
#23
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,591
#24
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 13,858
#25
Doxxed GEM Club 宝藏频道💎
@DoxxedChannel · 17,094
#26
OGY Degen Calls
@Insider_ECA · 5,643
#27
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,122
#28
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,888
#29
PRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 19,040
#30
sad cat
@sadcatgamble · 27,604
#31
💰ANIME GEMS💰
@AnimeGems · 9,355
#32
Levi's Gem Calls
@LevisGemCalls · 12,072
#33
Gems Mine Treasures
@GemsmineEth · 5,718
#34
Meta caller
@metacaller · 41,057
#35
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 98,020
#36
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 46,565
#37
Faded Crypto ARC
@fadedarc · 5,117
#38
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 36,545
#39
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 78,567
#40
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 32,968
#41
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 15,677
#42
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,000
#43
1000𝕏 Multi Chain
@MultiChain1000x · 9,358
#44
The Engineers
@engineercalls · 7,295
#45
Sapphire Call’s
@SapphireCalls · 12,091
#46
Greco
@defigreco · 6,201
#47
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,774
#48
The Casino
@thecasinoeye · 6,319
#49
THE EYE 👀
@eyecrosschain · 12,119
#50
GWS
@GWSai · 2,800
#51
CarnageCalls Gambles
@CarnagecallsGambles · 6,662
#52
Diary of Apes | α |
@diaryofapes · 4,563
#53
Julz Labs 🧪
@JulzLabs · 4,613
#54
Gems of Ra 💎👁‍🗨
@GemsofRa · 17,590
#55
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,224
#56
Gabbens Calls - Multichain
@GabbensCalls · 10,812
#57
Archerr's GAMBLE 🎲
@Archerrgambles · 5,588
#58
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,235
#59
Ev's Alphas
@HardSnipe · 11,639
#60
Spaceman Callz Solana
@spacemancallzsolana · 8,671
#61
Whale Wallet Watchers
@WhaleWalletWatchers · 7,776
#62
$hills Dollar Menu (Daily Trading Journal)
@TheIllestShills · 5,009
#63
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,118
#64
GENESIS CHAIN CALLS
@GenesisChain_Calls · 14,183
#65
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,429
#66
- BSC -
@lowtaxbsc · 39,395
#67
Shill Seals
@ShillSeals · 18,659
#68
BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls · 56,635
#69
Who Dis | Multi Chain Channel of Titan
@WhoDis6964 · 4,714
#70
The Caller
@thecallercrosschain · 7,912
#71
Call Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol · 27,067
#72
The Don's Calls
@TheDonsCalls · 12,289
#73
KOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 16,145
#74
Pyro Trading Journal
@pyrotradingjournal · 14,743
#75
- Vk -
@One_Vk · 1,958
#76
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,776
#77
🔱 N0 FXCKS GIVEN GAMBLES
@NFG_GAMBLES · 4,167
#78

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Meta caller
@metacaller · 41,057
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Shill Seals
@ShillSeals · 18,659
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 October 2026
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,173
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 35,456
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Crypto Gems 🚀📈🌟
@cryptogems555 · 23,435
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
wat is des
@watisdes · 29,824
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
- SOL -
@lowtaxsolana · 38,563
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Gubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,777
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,084
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 43,813
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Veigar Calls
@veigarcalls · 25,232
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
Dr. Crypto Calls ❁
@dr_crypto_channel · 17,256
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 34,692
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 110,922
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Shyroshi Gambles
@SHYROSHIGAMBLES · 24,148
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 October 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,047
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Crypto King Call
@Crypto_KingCall · 146,417
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,122
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
PRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 19,040
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 October 2026
Call Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol · 27,067
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
SOL TRENDING
@trendingssol · 132,162
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Sol Trading Bot Announcement
@SolTradingBot_Channel · 20,217
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 26 September 2026
Maybach Calls
@MaybachCalls · 31,365
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 27,113
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 88 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Degen Seals” (@DegenSeals), 34,123 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DegenSeals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.