Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Degen Seals

@DegenSeals

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,767subscribers

-77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001523523939
TypeChannel
Username@DegenSeals
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DegenSeals

Growth

33,76733,84433,805.57 August 2026 — 33,844 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,838 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,823 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,809 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,802 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,798 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,787 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,767 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,755–33,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:4833,767-20
13 Aug 2026, 07:5333,787-11
12 Aug 2026, 05:3233,798-4
11 Aug 2026, 01:5633,802-7
10 Aug 2026, 01:0633,809-14
9 Aug 2026, 01:2133,823-15
7 Aug 2026, 22:0333,838-6
7 Aug 2026, 00:4733,844first reading

Engagement

94 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.53%
avg views ÷ 33,767 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
94
of 94 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held94 (5 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total143,679
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC212 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🔸 $AKE And wooh, i hoped for $Rave or $ARIA kinda crime, and looks like it is happening. Thats 25xsa since the call.

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

14 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC687 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🔸 $Kii launching on binance alpha shortly. Ca : 0xEEC6574eAbBa52bac3f0277F2cD5Ac7e67197886 My take : KiiChain has a clearer real-world thesis than most L1 launches targeting actual FX and payment pain points in emerging markets with a hybrid on-chain engine and prior product experience via KIIEX. The $26M raise, named LatAm team, and long vesting on investor/team tokens are constructive. However, the project is s

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

14 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🪶 $DJT Degenning some here 0x1D11f0496982706C5e14A514D4E79F2e6BdE4516 Edit : Bought this too : 0xFED508E349C47F669E57c1A1Ba476E5E0e6b918e

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🪙 $Mosaic Aped some here, so by holding this token you can choose which on-chain (tokenized) stock you want their rewards paid in. So far its holding well so bought. https://dexscreener.com/solana/gjl62zuuadjm7czhrwtnbocgn31ksfywhsceyftwiwh

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 14 August 2026

🪙 $ORANGE Official @bitcoin page on X liked 2 of their tweets &getting some good interactions , set up a charity & are now OrangeCoin LLC Hit 2m ATH and dipped, hope to see team push this bottom here tbh C6ASDsxzqBvF5bCQFVAGMRWwfgZNhfozbb9DkgiKpump https://x.com/real_orangecoin/status/2087876426892452014?s=46

13 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🔸 $utility Holy moly groly, its going berserk..

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🪙 $Babyshib This candled to almost 1M, around 4 5xsa since the call and now tryna reverse from the dips.

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 14 August 2026

🔸 $utility Damnn thats some direct shill https://x.com/bstocksfinance/status/2087815880994611437 0xEde00776439f9C49C592e43EeE34777a51847777

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🪶 $YOLO Finally finally smashes new ath.

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,590 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🪙$Hyperbola If its not larp can really do some numbers, can read details of tech here https://x.com/i/status/2087755545893564780 https://dexscreener.com/solana/3fwwb6jemlt6ejqfwdzpntehgviv2jkqo6cmbczb9pg1

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🪶 $Pack Not a great entry, missed it while i was sleeping. But aped anyways, just kinda betting on the team here. Hope they will live upto their mark. Still dyor, as you never know 😂😂 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4900c6d3f31ff1e1545a487469c134cdbd9f1499f938054c0c77a14728b3f150

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

13 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 14 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x3! ☝️ @DegenSeals made a x3+ call on Baby Shib. $234K ➡️ $709K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!

Signed Cryptonian Princexsa 🇵🇸

Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @DegenSeals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 24,504 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 113,573
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
SOL TRENDING
@trendingssol · 144,694
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub · 171,982
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
中国密码鲸公司 🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖
@ChinapumpWXC · 112,459
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 193,253
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 626,953
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
🐳CODY WHALES CALL 中國🐳
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 200,959
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Degen Seals” (@DegenSeals), 33,767 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DegenSeals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.