this will be fun to watch ^^

Channel
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
36,346subscribers
-136 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001384778739 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @venomcalls |
| Description | For marketing proposals, message @OneVenoM. Gambles - https://t.me/venom_gambles Twitter - https://twitter.com/venomcrypto_ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/venomcalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 36,346 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 36,354 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 36,374 | -29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 36,403 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 36,413 | -32 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 36,445 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 36,468 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 36,482 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 36,482 | first reading |
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.98%
- avg views ÷ 36,346 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,540
- 32 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 32
- of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (24 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 81,210 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,350
- Videos
- ≈224
- Links
- ≈4,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
can’t wait for everyone to cry about not having entries I been shilling every dip 😭 $MAX
who here is old enough to remember cryptox spamming telegram groups before presale launches
Sticker, posted without a caption
$max at 500 bnb donated to giggle Still think CZ won’t notice?
hello
I also bought more $MAX
Sticker, posted without a caption
https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xa2b1926cb477e92445cf70602f1a7200361f761d
max is the best narrative on bsc
https://x.com/orange_coin_sol/status/2087088867518095410?s=46 lore for orange is pretty cool elon and saylor also refer bitcoin to the “orange” coin
https://dexscreener.com/solana/6xh4qvc9egbxeqe2oja4yzfmzde6xlsnvayxmkcsrrtq bought $orange heard good team
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @venomcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 17,593 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@allcryptocalls · 111 postBest_Calls
@Best_call · 41 postbeyondpay.io
@beyondpayio · 3,1131 postCHANNEL CLOSED
@brotherhoodgems · 2181 postBSC_BestStealthChannel
@BSC_BestStealthChannel · 71 postCatCoin2.0 ANNOUNCEMENT CHANNEL
@CatCoinTwoANN · 251 postCRAZYPANDA ANN
@CrazypandaAnn · 11,8281 postDogenix Inu NEWS
@dogenixinunews · 441 postEpiggy Channel
@Epiggyannouncements · 91 postFlokiZap 🐕⚡️ Announcements 📢
@FlokiZapAnnouncements · 1991 postGODHORTS LOUNGE
@godhortslounge · 81 postGoFitterAI Announcement
@GoFitterAiAnn · 141 postJustbetToken Global ANNOUNCEMENT♻️
@JustbetToken · 8,6181 postKitties Announcements
@KittiesEthAnn · 341 postL7DAO Announcement
@L7Dao · 181 postLuckyFloki Channel
@luckyflokichannel · 1761 postLuncSwap Announcement
@LuncSwapAnnouncement · 21 postMilkyFinance Channel
@milkyfinancechannel · 9451 postMONA TOKEN OFFICIAL CHANNEL
@monatokan_channel · 851 postMonverse Announcement
@monversenews · 2,0171 postMr. BIG WHALE | Official
@Mrwhitecalls · 701 postNoriGO! Announcements
@NoriGo_Announcements · 1,8831 postOptimus Announcement
@Optimus_Ann · 551 postPi Doge Announcement
@PidogeAnn · 141 postSignal calls
@SIGNALCALLS · 31,5521 postSkynet Gems 💎
@skynet_gems · 291 postsnackcalls
@snackcalls · 71 postTowerVerse- Announcement Channel
@towerverseannouncement · 51 postWATCHN Announcement
@watchnchannel · 151 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 62 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@MonkeLeaderboard · 2345 postsTokenRunner Channel
@tokenrunner_net · 5,2433 postswishallgood
@BeerusCatChannel · 352 postsBig Cat Crypto Channel
@bigcatcryptochannel · 242 postsChainGamingX Announcements
@cgxannouncement · 2892 posts小狐狸频道
@FoxAnnouncement · 392 postsLAEEB DOGE CHANNEL
@laeebdogechannel · 52 postsDaily Shill
@Martinshiller · 22 posts🍍Pineapples Calls🍍
@pineapplescalls · 342 postsSalmoninu Portal
@salmoninu · 4,8482 postsApez Gone Wild
@ApezGoneWild · 21 postMN
@AVVAKAARAS · 1671 postCoby Navigation
@CobyNavigation · 1521 postEmpire Calls
@EmpireCalls · 71 postFIFAPP Official Channel 🏆⚽
@FIFAPP_IO · 7561 postGolden Calls
@GoLdenCaLLsOfSoL · 641 postHODL CALLS
@hodlcalls · 2461 postJSweat J2E Official
@JSweatChannel · 3,0221 postLaunchgamefi🚀
@launchgamefi · 791 postLIUX ANNOUNCE
@liuxannounce · 651 postLuckyFloki Channel
@luckyflokichannel · 1761 postSnow | MetaVerse
@snowmetaverse888 · 231 postTowerVerse- Announcement Channel
@towerverseannouncement · 51 post肝帝 | Workaholic | B B
@WorkaholicAnn · 591 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MaestroBotsHub · 171,982
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@trendingssol · 144,876
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@WatcherGuru · 627,083
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 193,483
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VenoMCalls” (@venomcalls), 36,346 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/venomcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.