Channel
@ob_obraz
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,237subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001474817987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ob_obraz |
| Description | Объединённое образование Школа и вуз снова вместе: для тех, кто учит, и для тех, кто учится. Мы в MAX: https://max.ru/ob_obraz Telegram бот для связи: @ob_obraz_bot Еще мейл: [email protected] Резервный контакт: @nameee01 РКН: clck.ru/3FX95Z |
| Created | 9 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ob_obraz |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @karaulny | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 41 minutes | this entry (18–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 248 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 06:56 | 30,237 | -9 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:01 | 30,246 | -8 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:29 | 30,254 | -9 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:29 | 30,263 | -4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:17 | 30,267 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:20 | 30,273 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:30 | 30,274 | +5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:00 | 30,269 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:38 | 30,279 | -25 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 30,304 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:48 | 30,317 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:07 | 30,326 | -17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 30,343 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 30,349 | +7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 30,342 | +8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 30,334 | -11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 30,345 | +6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 30,339 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:09 | 30,346 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:07 | 30,350 | first reading |
251 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 166 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 251 (29 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 527,980 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjeS7FeK | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqwpTPY8 | 1 | 23 September 2026 | 23 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFJsyGiV | 1 | 7 October 2026 | 7 October 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqDgH9TeyLK8vTS6HYCQoQuZFQWnRLQxuuK55a | 1 | 28 August 2026 | 28 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 251 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 80 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Новый заместитель появился у главы Минпросвещения. После серии отставок Сергею Кравцову приходилось обходиться всего четырьмя замами, что очень мало по сравнению с большинством других министерств. И вот заместителем назначена Юлия Пономарева. В последнее время Пономарева руководила организациями при Минпросвещения: Фонда новых форм развития образования, Центром просветительских инициатив, Федеральным институтом цифр…
На итоговое сочинение в этом году в 53 регионах впервые записаться можно через Госуслуги. И, по данным Минцифры, сервисом воспользовались на данный момент около 70% тех, кому он доступен, — более 200 тысяч человек. До завершения срока подачи заявлений остается чуть более надели: заявиться надо не позднее 18 ноября, за две недели до проведения. А основная дата итогового сочинения — 2 декабря. Подавать через Госуслуги…
Правила получения семейного образования могут быть скорректированы в случае принятия законопроекта, рассматриваемого в Совете Федерации. Прежде всего, речь идет о государственном контроле за аттестацией детей — сейчас ответственность за освоение учебной программы и организацию обучения лежит на родителях. По мнению сенаторов, «это может привести к ситуации, когда ребенок не получает должного образования и остается б…
Новую модель адаптации к насыщенной ИИ действительности придумали в VK Education. Познакомиться с ключевыми направлениями IT и понять, какое из них ближе, можно будет, погружаясь в истории трех студентов, которые вместе создают AI-ассистента для улучшения резюме. Каждый из героев отвечает за конкретное направление: разработку, искусственный интеллект или продакт-менеджмент. В бесплатном курсе-сериале «Лабиринт возмо…
Очередной проект законодательной отмены #ЕГЭ не поддержал профильный комитет СФ. На этот раз Комитет СФ по науке, образованию и культуре отверг проект внесенный в Госдуму председателем комитета ГД по защите семьи, вопросам отцовства, материнства и детства Ниной Останиной. Против предложения не поддерживать инициативу выступил только один голосовавший, а воздержавшихся вообще не было. Останина предлагала заменить ЕГЭ…
Во время симпозиума «Большая наука в школе» в Новосибирске объявили о совместном плане двух министерств организовать одноименную программу — «Большая наука в школах». По словам главы Минобрнауки Валерия Фалькова, им с главой Минпросвещения «Сергеем Сергеевичем пришла идея запустить отдельную большую школьную программу с условным названием "Большая наука в школы", где учителя школ, заинтересованные школьники могли бы …
#Цитата_без_комментария Эксперт Минпросвещения РФ, ведущий научный сотрудник Института изучения детства, семьи и воспитания Надежда Бабарыкина — об оценках за поведение, вводимых во 2-8 классах российских школ: «Механизм оценивания поведения обучающихся в образовательной организации предусматривает наличие конструктивной обратной связи родителям и школьникам от педагога с объяснением причин выставления конкретной оце…
О высоких конкурсах и проходных баллах в ходе вузовской приемной кампании этого года написано много. «Фонтанка» попыталась разобраться в реальной ситуации в престижном СПбГУ, проанализировав минимальные и средние проходные баллы для бюджетных и платных мест. Специальности сгруппировали в 6 условных блоков: ИТ, «Физика, химия, география», «Биология, медицина, психология», «Экономика, менеджмент, социология», «Юриспру…
Самая большая детская школа искусств открылась в Арктике: в Новом Уренгое построен корпус ДШИ имени Рахманинова, где будут преподавать музыку и танец, театр и изобразительное искусство, фотографию и звукозапись. В здании — современные классы, залы, студии и мастерские, есть все необходимое оборудование: одних только музыкальных инструментов куплено 150 штук. И наконец — это просто очень красиво и необычно, как внутри…
Распределение контрольных цифр приема на 2027/28 учебный год начало Министерство культуры. Заявки от вузов на прием на бюджет по специальностям и направлениям подготовки и (или) укрупненным группам по образовательным программам высшего образования в области искусств за исключением культурологии и дизайна будут принимать до 18.00 часов по московскому времени 25 ноября 2026 года. Вскрытие конвертов с заявками назначен…
Исполняющим обязанности ректора Дагестанского государственного педагогического университета имени Гамзатова стал Муслим Телякавов, еще в сентябре занимавший должность заместителя Председателя Правительства республики. После отставки по собственному желанию с 1 октября Телякавов был советником премьера Дагестана, а уже вчера в качестве нового руководителя его представили ученому совету вуза. Предшественник Телякавова…
Учителя могут проверять работы с телефона или компьютера, не носить с собой стопки тетрадей и не опасаться что-то потерять, родители получают возможность видеть не только оценку, но и работу ребенка, а дети — это наблюдать за своим прогрессом и повторять сложные темы. На сайте столичного Департамента образования появились вопросы и ответы о работе новшества в цифровизации учебного процесса — «Электронной тетради кон…
Showing the 12 most recent of 251 posts we hold for @ob_obraz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ob_obraz edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 2 posts on @ob_obraz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОбОбраз” (@ob_obraz), 30,237 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ob_obraz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.