12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -501. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,543–51,284 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 13:09
50,628
-3
16 Aug 2026, 06:47
50,631
-34
14 Aug 2026, 15:08
50,665
-54
13 Aug 2026, 06:26
50,719
-107
12 Aug 2026, 07:58
50,826
-37
11 Aug 2026, 09:06
50,863
-66
10 Aug 2026, 08:47
50,929
-12
9 Aug 2026, 09:12
50,941
-104
8 Aug 2026, 05:31
51,045
-153
7 Aug 2026, 07:01
51,198
+69
6 Aug 2026, 05:45
51,129
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:37
51,129
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.4%
avg views ÷ 50,628 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,500
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
44 (28 July 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
945,150
Reactions total
24,778
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 23:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,700
Videos
≈257
Links
≈2,730
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
23,918 reactions across 41 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,367
22.4%
🤡
5,293
22.1%
😢
3,145
13.1%
🤯
2,735
11.4%
👍
2,094
8.75%
🔥
1,806
7.55%
😁
1,671
6.99%
💯
850
3.55%
🤬
330
1.38%
🗿
233
0.974%
🐳
160
0.669%
💘
78
0.326%
😱
50
0.209%
🤮
50
0.209%
🥰
38
0.159%
💋
18
0.075%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,778reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 44 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grandexam_ege. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.27%
1 of 44 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
14,800
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
23,300
over 43 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGjTwV3
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Перед 1 сентября мошенники снова вышли на охоту за студентами 👻
Схема такая: публикуют красивое объявление об аренде квартиры — свежий ремонт, хороший хозяин, рядом с вузом, цена ниже рынка, иногда ещё и коммуналку обещают не брать.
Дальше просят внести предоплату. Якобы только после этого дадут телефон собственника или забронируют просмотр, потому что «желающих много».
После перевода денег — классика: номер оказы…
В региональных вузах снова всплыла история с «мертвыми душами» на бюджете 😳
В Алтайском крае расследуют дело бывшего ректора Алтайского аграрного университета — по версии следствия, чтобы выполнить план по бюджетным местам, он поручил зачислить на первый курс 97 действующих студентов.
———
Эксперты в интервью РБК объяснили, зачем сотрудники вузов идут на такие нарушения закона: если вуз не выполняет контрольные ци…
⚡️ Минпросвещения заявило, что школьников не будут заставлять смотреть «Колобка»
В связи с появившимися в социальных сетях сообщениями о том, что Минпросвещения России «распорядилось организовать для школьников 1–9-х классов обязательный просмотр фильма „Колобок“», официально заявляем: данная информация не соответствует действительности.
Минпросвещения России не издавало распорядительных или нормативных документов,…
❓ Друзья, а есть тут те, к кому на этапе поступления (или сейчас — в преддверии этапа заселения в общежитие) стучались мошенники?
Если было, напишите коротко, как это выглядело ⬇️
Бывшего ректора Алтайского аграрного университета обвиняют в том, что он зачислил на бюджет 97 несуществующих абитуриентов 😳
Точнее, по версии следствия, это были не новые абитуриенты, а уже действующие студенты вуза.
По данным следствия, в 2024 году руководству Алтайского аграрного университета поручили выполнить план по заполнению бюджетных мест на 2025-2026 учебный год. Ответственным за выполнение этой задачи на…
Учёба — это не обязательно пары с 9 утра и дорога до университета 🎓
Если рассматриваешь онлайн-обучение, у Сбера и Нетологии есть специальное предложение: оформляешь образовательный кредит с господдержкой в Сбере, а Нетология компенсирует платежи по кредиту за первый год обучения.
Можно выбрать онлайн-бакалавриат или магистратуру, разработанные с топ вузами: НИУ ВШЭ, Финансовый университет, Московский Политех.
Рас…
В РФ предложили новую схему поступления в вузы: учитывать одновременно и ЕГЭ, и победу в олимпиаде.
С такой идеей выступил замсекретаря Общественной палаты Владислав Гриб:
«Может быть, в вуз принимать по схеме: "ЕГЭ плюс победа в олимпиаде", нежели только ЕГЭ, или нежели только победа в олимпиаде».
▪️При этом существенно усложнять ЕГЭ он не предлагает. По его словам, экзамен и сейчас достаточно сложный, а получить …
От себя.
▪️С одной стороны, действительно слишком простой экзамен не позволяет дифференцировать выпускников по уровню знаний. Какой смысл в высоких баллах, если они есть у всех? Как это поможет поступлению в вуз, если при слишком лёгких экзаменах просто вырастут проходные баллы? Собственно, именно это мы и видели в этом году.
▪️С другой стороны, эту проблему можно решить и без усложнения экзаменов. Хотя мы и говори…
Рособрнадзор отказался усложнять задания ЕГЭ.
В ведомстве объяснили: задания экзамена определяются ФГОС и федеральными образовательными программами. То есть за рамки школьной программы ЕГЭ выходить не должен.
При этом экзамен должен решать сразу две задачи:
▪️провести итоговую аттестацию
▪️разделить абитуриентов по уровню подготовки для поступления в вузы
"Рособрнадзор не ставит перед собой задачу усложнения соде…
До начала учебного года осталось совсем немного — это лучшее время, чтобы начать подготовку без спешки.
Если вы переходите в 10 или 11 класс, обратите внимание на бесплатный интенсив «Восхождение к ЕГЭ».
📅 16-28 августа
Вас ждёт подготовка сразу по 4 предметам:
• профильная математика;
• физика;
• информатика;
• русский язык.
После регистрации можно получить мини-курс в подарок, готовый план подготовки к ЕГЭ 2027…
❤59🤬8👍6🤡5🔥4🐳2🤮1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @grandexam_ege. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@grandexam_ege edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 134,544 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Математика с Ильичом | ЕГЭ проф мат | 100балльный репетитор @ilchegg · 159,768 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Артур Шарафиев | Профильная математика ЕГЭ 2027 | Турик Матанит | Умскул @art_matanit · 122,230 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Grand Exam - Арсений Филин” (@grandexam_ege), 50,628 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grandexam_ege.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
