Всё про поступление в вузы!…и не только😉
По вопросам сотрудничества и консультаций по поступлению - @shag_reserv
Чат: https://t.me/+19nDYXORN9lkM2I6
RT: https://rutube.ru/u/stepbyshag/
Отзывы: @about_stepbyshag
Включён в перечень РКН
Created
31 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -653. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,901–72,750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:44
71,999
-33
11 Aug 2026, 16:57
72,032
-65
10 Aug 2026, 17:11
72,097
-106
9 Aug 2026, 18:21
72,203
-41
8 Aug 2026, 21:43
72,244
-218
8 Aug 2026, 00:13
72,462
-124
6 Aug 2026, 22:57
72,586
-66
6 Aug 2026, 09:46
72,652
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 71,999 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
35 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
331,230
Reactions total
11,740
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈806
Videos
≈11
Links
≈2,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,740 reactions across 28 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,072
34.7%
🎉
1,949
16.6%
👍
1,582
13.5%
👌
1,239
10.6%
👀
1,125
9.58%
🔥
295
2.51%
🏆
248
2.11%
🍾
222
1.89%
🙈
202
1.72%
⚡
177
1.51%
😢
164
1.40%
❤🔥
121
1.03%
🤔
77
0.656%
👏
56
0.477%
🤣
40
0.341%
🤷♂
34
0.29%
😭
25
0.213%
💔
24
0.204%
💘
22
0.187%
😁
18
0.153%
8 further kinds
48
0.409%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,740reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 28 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stepbyshag. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.86%
1 of 35 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
8,020
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
12,400
over 27 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjdZzod5
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Листаешь ленту, и бац — сообщение: «Ты выиграл приз — для получения подтверди данные!» 🎁
Звучит как удача, да? А на деле — это ловушка, которую умело плетут для тебя мошенники.
«Только сейчас», «не говори родителям, это секрет», «успевай, иначе подарок сгорит», а затем — чёткий план действий: скинь данные карты, введи код из СМС, переведи «страховку».
Если видишь такое — просто остановись:
✔️ Не скидывай никакую …
Про поступление на платное.
Друзья, делимся подборкой актуальных постов про поступление на платное в этом году.
Битва в этом году серьезная как за бюджетные, так и за платные места, в особенности в топ-вузах, желаем каждому из вас одержать победу!)
📎 Инструкция по поступлению на платное
📎 Как не "пролететь" с платкой
📎 Образовательный кредит
📎 Нюансы обр.кредита 2026
📎 Платное VS целевое
📎 Уловки вузов и прик…
Доска объявлений о дополнительном наборе (не путаем с доп зачислением, которое завершается 11 августа)
📍 Дополнительный набор 2026
— это новая мини-приемная кампания, проводится в тех вузах и по тем направлениям, где остались незаполненные бюджетные места после приоритетного, основного, дополнительного этапов зачисления.
Если после 11 августа все места заняты, то доп. набор вуз не проводит.
⏺ Информация о наличии …
Социальная стипендия: как получить и почему об этом стоит знать уже на 1 курсе.
В нашем чате неожиданно развернулось большое обсуждение социальной стипендии. И выяснилось, что многие студенты вообще не знают, что могут на нее претендовать.
Собрали опыт подписчиков и перепроверили нормативную базу.
1️⃣ Социальная стипендия не только для сирот и инвалидов
Государственная социальная стипендия положена нескольким льгот…
Чемодан, вокзал, вахта!
Для большинства «работа вахтой» до сих пор звучит страшновато. Где и с кем будешь жить? Что тебя ждет на производстве? Как кормят в конце концов? И каково это вообще – надолго уехать от дома куда-нибудь в тайгу или на Чукотку?
В подкасте «Мама, я на вахту» от компании «Ареал» студенты рассказывают, как всё оказалось на самом деле: почему они выбрали свои специальности, что удивило их на перв…
Позиция в конкурсном списке, метод коэффициента "пустышки"6%
По ВПП - метод "цветочек"/запас прочности внизу3%
По верхним 1-2 приоритетам с согласиями (правило трех приоритетов)5%
По верхним 1-2 приоритетам в заявлениях5%
Ничем не пользовались12%
Опрос ко мне не относится37%
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Хотим узнать, какие методы оценки шансов у вас СРАБОТАЛИ?
Считали/ориентировались по проходным прошлым лет18%
Считали/ориентировались по средним баллам прошлых лет12%
По отклонению проходного от прошлого года8%
По конкурсным спискам (позиция), метод коэффициента "пустышки"13%
По ВПП - метод "цветочек"/запас прочности внизу22%
По верхним 1-2 приоритетам с согласиями (правило трех приоритетов)18%
По верхним 1-2 приоритетам в заявлениях9%
Использовали иные методы (поделюсь в комментариях)2%
Ничем не пользовались16%
Опрос ко мне не относится35%
The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Чемпионы Международной олимпиады по ИИ (IOAI) вернулись домой с 8 медалями и званием абсолютных победителей.
Это третья подряд победа наших школьников на престижнейшей мировой ИИ-олимпиаде. Подготовкой сборной России к Международной олимпиаде традиционно занимались эксперты Центрального университета и Альянса в сфере ИИ, куда входит Т-Банк, Сбер и другие крупные технологические компании.
В копилке российской команд…
Дополнительный этап зачисления и дополнительный набор.
Кто может? Где будет? Когда будет?
🌸Дополнительный этап зачисления и дополнительный набор — 2 принципиально разных понятия.
📍 Дополнительный этап зачисления
⏺ Проводится зачисление в тех вузах и на тех направлениях, на которых остались незаполненные основные бюджетные места.
Если после 7 августа все места распределены, то доп. зачисление вуз не проводит.
⏺ Пре…
Всем привет!
На связи Сергей Кондратьев, сооснователь и руководитель проекта ШАГ.
Сегодня выходят приказы о зачислении на бюджет, и, наверное, это тот самый момент, когда наконец можно немного выдохнуть и оглянуться назад.
Хотя каждый год в это время я думаю одно и то же: как много всего помещается в несколько месяцев приемной кампании и как мало лета. На протяжении 16 лет каждое мое лето - приемная кампания, 12 лет…
❤723🍾60👏32🔥21❤🔥8💔8👍7💘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @stepbyshag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Позиция в конкурсном списке, метод коэффициента "пустышки"6%
По ВПП - метод "цветочек"/запас прочности внизу3%
По верхним 1-2 приоритетам с согласиями (правило трех приоритетов)5%
По верхним 1-2 приоритетам в заявлениях5%
Ничем не пользовались12%
Опрос ко мне не относится37%
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Хотим узнать, какие методы оценки шансов у вас СРАБОТАЛИ?
Считали/ориентировались по проходным прошлым лет18%
Считали/ориентировались по средним баллам прошлых лет12%
По отклонению проходного от прошлого года8%
По конкурсным спискам (позиция), метод коэффициента "пустышки"13%
По ВПП - метод "цветочек"/запас прочности внизу22%
По верхним 1-2 приоритетам с согласиями (правило трех приоритетов)18%
По верхним 1-2 приоритетам в заявлениях9%
Использовали иные методы (поделюсь в комментариях)2%
Ничем не пользовались16%
Опрос ко мне не относится35%
The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Первые уведомления о зачислении начали приходить на ГУ абитуриентам, поступающим на приоритетном этапе (квоты, БВИ).
Пришло «Вы включены в приказ о зачислении» 🎉13%
Пока не пришло, ждуууу 👀8%
Не прошли по конкурсу на приоритетном этапе1%
Планирую отказаться от зачисления на приоритетном этапе, чтобы участвовать в общем конкурсе1%
Поступаю на основном этапе по общему конкурсу40%
Опрос ко мне не относится36%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 12,863 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ШАГ | поступление в Университет” (@stepbyshag), 71,999 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stepbyshag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.