Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for All I Know Is That I Don't Know Nothing

Channel

All I Know Is That I Don't Know Nothing

@alliknowisthatidontknownothing

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,515subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001300740608
TypeChannel
Username@alliknowisthatidontknownothing
Created11 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alliknowisthatidontknownothing

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,5123,5393,525.56 August 2026 — 3,539 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,539 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,536 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,533 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,528 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,525 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,520 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,519 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,517 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,512 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,514 subscribers24 September 2026 — 3,515 subscribers3,5156 August 202624 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 49 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,508–3,543 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 23:013,515+1
16 Sept 2026, 12:403,514+2
12 Sept 2026, 09:003,512-5
8 Sept 2026, 12:183,517-2
3 Sept 2026, 09:413,519-1
30 Aug 2026, 21:073,520-5
28 Aug 2026, 02:223,525-3
22 Aug 2026, 17:563,528-5
18 Aug 2026, 23:383,533-3
10 Aug 2026, 05:113,536-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:303,539no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:193,539first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

320 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤13843.1%
🔥9429.4%
👍4815.0%
💯144.38%
🤔123.75%
😱51.56%
🤩41.25%
😢30.938%
🤯20.625%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alliknowisthatidontknownothing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
474
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
607
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHU7kUy124 July 202624 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC179 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Через Ширшу в Маймаксу В моем детстве в Архангельске говорили «через Ширшу в Маймаксу» — про человека, который добрался куда надо самым нелепым из возможных путей. Но когда-то этот путь был самым разумным. В Ширше с конца XVIII века работал завод: лил чугун, делал якоря, пушки и железо для парусного флота. Готовое везли водой, по речке Ширшеме, через Маймаксу, на верфь в Соломбале, где строили корабли. Никакого абс…

👍10🔥7❤2💯1😱1

2 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC358 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вина как метка Когда узнаю про новую классную книжку, то чувствую вину, что ее не читаю (и возможно не прочитаю никогда). Когда узнаю про новую музыку, такого чувства нет. Наоборот, есть предвкушение, что можно послушать когда-нибудь и кайфануть. Иногда слушаю, иногда нет. И могу переслушивать одно и то же двадцать лет без проблем с совестью. Так же с английским, сохраненками, вайбкодингом, ведением телеграма: когд…

❤15💯6🔥3👍1

24 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC474 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHU7kUyPhoto

Практика начинается не после учебы Мы привыкли, что сначала университет дает знания, а потом работа дает практику. Диплом здесь, опыт там. Но, кажется, эта граница исчезает. Если студент уже во время обучения работает с теми же процессами и сервисами, которые используются в индустрии, переход в профессию становится гораздо естественнее. Он просто продолжает делать то, что уже делал. На эту идею делает ставку ИТ-хо…

❤3👍2🤔2💯1🔥1

3 Jul 2026, 06:07 UTC627 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Написал рассылку, развернув понимание фразы Андрея Карпаты про отчуждение мышления и понимания. Заметка на полях: прокачать свое понимание можно через обучение других, так приходится разобраться в предмете. https://open.substack.com/pub/khabaroff/p/76

❤10🔥3🤯2

19 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC769 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Обновлял контекст своего ассистента, которым пользуюсь каждый день где-то полгода. Два вывода меня особенно потрясли: 1. «Ты строишь тут не дисциплину, а самоограничители, которые делают невыгодным то, к чему тебя тянет паттерн», — назидательно говорит мне он. Один пример: работа с паттерном «прибедняться» за полгода принесла в три раза больше денег за тот же объем работы, который я бы и так сделал из интереса. 2.…

👍8🔥7🤩4❤3

1 Jun 2026, 14:46 UTC849 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Куда уходит капитал Ютуб подсунул мне видео про то, как тратить деньги, чтобы быть счастливее. Начал смотреть про покупки, закончил Бурдье, символическим капиталом и вопросом, какие капиталы есть у Клода. Как одно вытекло из другого — в тексте. Что ваш лайк, шер и сабскрайб значат для символического капитала — там же. → https://khabaroff.substack.com/p/a69

❤17🔥1

21 May 2026, 06:31 UTC965 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Когда исполнение ничего не стоит, дорожает выбор Кирилл Меньшов из Сбера выкатил большой текст про то, как ИИ перестраивает всю разработку, но выводы можно сделать шире. Тезис понятный: исполнение схлопывается, написать код дешево, дефицитным ресурсом становится намерение. В этой модели намерение исходит от человека готовой постановкой: знаешь, чего хочешь, формулируешь, агент исполняет. Я бы добавил второй дефицит…

🔥11❤5🤔4

15 May 2026, 12:32 UTC698 views12 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Выступил на Коньференции «Клуб 101 креатора» провел «Коньференцию», которая собралась стихийно, может, поэтому и вышла душевной. 13 докладов, ноль самопродаж, куча креатива. Я показал несколько кейсов про иишных помощников: — ThinkFu — каталог из 200+ мыслительных приемов — AI-терапевт по протоколу CBT — панель из шести экспертов, спорящих над одним решением — MiroFish — симулятор общества из тысяч агентов Когда с…

🔥12

10 May 2026, 15:35 UTC727 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Учится не ученик — учится система Я люблю переносить паттерны обучения (и даже школы) на бизнес. И тут серия репортов Microsoft неожиданно валидирует этот перенос — через тезис, что организации должны учиться. Не сотрудники, а организации. Microsoft обнаружил то, что давно знают учителя. Для Work Trend Index 2026 опросили 20 000 человек в десяти странах, проверили 29 факторов. И получили число, которое в школе нико…

❤12🔥10👍3💯3🤔1

9 May 2026, 14:06 UTC608 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Работа и работа про работу Мне нравится идея разделять саму работу и работу про работу. Первая — это когда из тебя что-то выходит наружу: текст, продукт, решение, разговор, действие. Вторая — когда ты настраиваешь, сравниваешь, переустанавливаешь, мигрируешь, оптимизируешь. Обе нужны в свое время, обе ощущаются как продуктивность, но только одна оставляет след в мире, а другая — в твоем конфиге. Думаю, многим знако…

❤14👍3

8 May 2026, 15:31 UTC533 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Агент, который говорит «забей» Почти три недели пишу каждый день. У этого есть свои причины, они за кадром. Но конечно же мне захотелось систематизировать посты и делать все по науке — выделить темы, цели, прикрутить маркетинг. И во время разговора с Клодом по поводу контент-плана он выдал: Что я бы сейчас не делал — Не собирал бы банк на 30 заготовок через матрицу рамок. Это на самом деле съест неделю — потому что…

❤11🔥4🤔2

7 May 2026, 16:50 UTC502 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Есть ли понимание без знания? Два часа разгонял с Клодом тезисы и все равно не договорились. Чтобы что-то понимать, нужно втащить знание в себя — прочитать книги, пройти курсы, поработать рядом с теми, кто разбирается, — и набрать внутри себя достаточно фактов, паттернов, синтаксиса, чтобы из них собралось понимание. Знание загружается, понимание из него вырастает. Чтобы понимать, надо знать, а чтобы знать, надо уч…

❤5🔥4😱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alliknowisthatidontknownothing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Школа мышления. Вояж в страну загадок.
@shkolamishleniA · 22,743
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
Вакансии в образовании
@edujobs · 65,872
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
Эдтехно | образование
@edtexno · 21,287
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 September 2026
Живое обучение
@prolearning · 20,688
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 26 September 2026
Образование, которое мы заслужили
@ru_education · 42,533
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 29 August 2026
ОбОбраз
@ob_obraz · 30,398
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“All I Know Is That I Don't Know Nothing” (@alliknowisthatidontknownothing), 3,515 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alliknowisthatidontknownothing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.