Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 98 days, net +101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,364–6,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 11:06
6,511
-4
8 Nov 2026, 03:16
6,515
+1
4 Nov 2026, 18:28
6,514
-4
1 Nov 2026, 18:57
6,518
+5
29 Oct 2026, 23:10
6,513
+5
23 Oct 2026, 23:14
6,508
-4
20 Oct 2026, 22:16
6,512
-7
18 Oct 2026, 06:48
6,519
-20
14 Oct 2026, 23:50
6,539
+15
12 Oct 2026, 00:15
6,524
-14
5 Oct 2026, 13:16
6,538
+10
28 Sept 2026, 03:02
6,528
+53
14 Sept 2026, 16:17
6,475
+19
11 Sept 2026, 03:00
6,456
+9
6 Sept 2026, 13:40
6,447
+2
2 Sept 2026, 02:04
6,445
-7
29 Aug 2026, 15:33
6,452
-10
26 Aug 2026, 22:56
6,462
-13
24 Aug 2026, 03:53
6,475
+2
20 Aug 2026, 19:24
6,473
first reading
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 6,511 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
72 (22 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
63,807
Reactions total
2,637
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,540
Videos
≈892
Links
≈1,130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 10s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,952 reactions across 68 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,833
37.0%
💯
957
19.3%
👍
603
12.2%
🤬
203
4.10%
🔥
181
3.66%
👏
157
3.17%
🤮
146
2.95%
❤
144
2.91%
🤔
117
2.36%
😢
111
2.24%
🤡
73
1.47%
🤯
68
1.37%
💩
56
1.13%
🙈
37
0.747%
🌚
34
0.687%
😱
22
0.444%
🤩
20
0.404%
🥰
20
0.404%
🥴
20
0.404%
🕊
17
0.343%
25 further kinds
133
2.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,380 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 72 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @polpotkids. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 72 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (20.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Бомба для подрыва российского полковника прилетела на воздушном шаре со стороны Прибалтики — СМИ
«По предварительным данным, СВУ перенаправили на территорию Ленобласти при помощи воздушного шара. Неизвестный подобрал «посылку» и в назначенное время в нужном месте сделал закладку для исполнителя. Также стало известно, что сам подрывник после Турции направился в Кишинев, откуда не осуществляется выдача подозреваемых р…
Французскому писателю Мишелю Уэльбеку предъявлены обвинения «в соучастии в подстрекательстве к дискриминации, ненависти или насилию». Об этом сообщает Le Figaro со ссылкой на знакомые с делом источники.
«Преследование 70-летнего писателя было инициировано прокурором Французской республики после жалоб Союза мечетей Франции (UMF) и Движения против расизма и за дружбу между народами (MRAP) еще в январе 2023-го года. По…
Постироничный форс эль-Сайеда про «закон шаурмы» перешел грани, считает шариатский Х.
Не верьте: я не хочу закон шариата (Sharia Law), я хочу закон шаурмы (Shawarma Law). У нас будет лучшая шаурма. Если в шаурме салат — вам соврали, это сэндвич, а не шаурма.
Все потому что его подхватил блогер Sneako (американо-филиппино-исламская версия Стаса Ай Как Просто), который сейчас путешествует по странам Средней Азии вмес…
Египет тотально банит «Братьев-мусульман» Запада: Совет мусульман Европы и еще 35 организаций («женских, студенческих, гуманитарных, исследовательских и семейных») из Франции, Великобритании, Швейцарии, Германии, Швеции и Италии признаны террористическими
Поскольку внутри Египта руководящее звено террористических «Братьев-мусульман» практически полностью ликвидировано, Каир переключил внимание на уничтожение их внеш…
Нюанс этой бредовой «шутки» в том, что перечисленные дагестанские спортсмены давно и плотно индоктринированы идеологией террористического джамаата ихванов, который дает им фетвы о дозволенности харамного катания в трусах по октагону на радость корпорациям, медиа и толпе — ради увеличения каналов влияния на бабуинов. Махачев и Нурмагомедов — вообще распространители ваххабизма.
То есть они в той же партии, что и аль-С…
Результаты мирных инициатив США при Трампе:
Израиль и ХАМАС: Не решены базовые вопросы статуса территорий и управления Газой, де-факто продолжение войны;
Израиль и Иран: Подсвисшая ситуация с жестким минусом для США, при этом Иран продолжает развивать ядерную программу и управлять региональными прокси, а Израиль — наносить удары;
Индия и Пакистан: Нью-Дели официально отверг посредничество Трампа, а многолетний тер…
— Смотрите, краковский мясник был вдохновлен пророссийскими настроениями, потому что его отец был членом региональной участковой избирательной комиссии от малочисленной политической группы, про которую наша самая честная Википедия пишет, что она «пророссийская».
— Его отец в 20-м году поддерживал Павла Танажно. Это леволиберальная семейка.
— Нет, это история сына-левака, восстающего на отца-консерватора.
— Его сес…
Переехавшая на подконтрольные FRN территории уроженка запада ДР Конго в обращении к президенту Чисекеди потребовала перестать педалировать ненависть между конголезцами, рассказав, что ее знакомых — лингалоязычных уроженок центральных регионов Конго — из-за «подозрительно непатриотичной» внешности (высокого роста и тонкого носа) отправляют в Киншасе по маршруту «чемодан — вокзал — Кигали».
А потом евразийцы расскажут…
Красный джигит Лумумба, чье имя было ранее свято даже для первоклассников Киргизской ССР, мечтал построить постколониальное общество инклюзивного равенства. Спустя десятки лет после его смерти, под занавес очередной итерации конголезской государственности, — собственно, лумумбистской, — мы имеем факт первой в истории массовой диджитал-трансляции трайбалистского каннибализма на фоне антиконституционного отчуждения гра…
Трагедия в Кракове: в результате массовой стрельбы погибли по меньшей мере шесть человек, нападавший расправился со своей семьей
Польские правоохранительные органы установили личность стрелка. Им оказался 25-летний гражданин Польши Михал Оксиньский, уроженец города Островец-Свентокшиский. Сообщается, что он работал токарем и являлся членом местного стрелкового клуба, имея официальное спортивное разрешение на оружие.…
🤯35😢24👏4❤3👍2💊2😁2😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @polpotkids. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дева Дивная @deva_divna · 27,533 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Кирилл Кабанов @kabanovkv · 52,280 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
Тени Руси @tenirusi · 24,725 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Неверный путь @nevernyyput · 49,903 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Alex Parker Returns @apwagner_real · 41,063 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
МИРОНОВ ДЕ-ФАКТО @mironov_de_facto · 18,857 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Утенок Пол Пота” (@polpotkids), 6,511 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polpotkids.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.