3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,384–6,413 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 02:53
6,387
-23
6 Aug 2026, 03:20
6,410
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:56
6,410
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.1%
avg views ÷ 6,387 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,880
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
28 (22 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
80,731
Reactions total
2,743
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 47s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,315 reactions across 24 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
908
39.2%
👍
445
19.2%
💯
321
13.9%
❤
94
4.06%
🤬
89
3.84%
💩
56
2.42%
🤡
56
2.42%
🤮
55
2.38%
👏
52
2.25%
😢
51
2.20%
🔥
24
1.04%
🥴
20
0.864%
🤩
19
0.821%
😱
18
0.778%
🤯
16
0.691%
🙈
15
0.648%
🥱
11
0.475%
🌭
10
0.432%
👀
10
0.432%
🌚
8
0.346%
14 further kinds
37
1.60%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,743reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 28 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @polpotkids. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Пентабазированные ботократы пытаются украсть выборы» — скажут провокаторы и враги, как будто нет причин, почему у нескольких сот россиян периодически одновременно среди ночи резко возникает непреодолимое желание зайти голосовать на этот канал.
Колосящиеся партийные надои выстреливают аккурат тогда, когда КПРФ, внезапно ставшая тараном против ботократической оккупации, идет вверх. В сущности — имеет место все та же …
Все они были мертвы. Волк, Медведь, Заяц. Каждый хотел меня съесть. Каждый получил свое. Собирать улики стало поздно пару сотен патронов назад. В ее объятиях я забывал о мертвых, хотя и знал, что скоро присоединюсь к ним. Мы были похожи на двух призраков, преследующих друг друга в темноте. «Чего я хочу: мечты Колобка». Сигарету. Выпить. Чтобы светило солнце. Забыться и заснуть. Изменить прошлое. Вернуть Бабку и Дедку…
О, правда? Но есть нюансы: в перераспределении ресурсов востока Конго поучаствовали даже такие страны, как Бурунди, вот только помогло это не ВВП их государства, а исключительно личному благосостоянию режима. Да и не конголезские это ресурсы, ибо, во‑первых, постколониальные границы остались колониальными, а потому должны быть пересмотрены, во‑вторых, конголезского государства там нет, даже террористы ИГ на местах об…
Самое честное голосование наглядно.
Надойная такая лесенка. Бурные, долго не стихающие аплодисменты, переходящие в овацию. Все встают.
«Обратная связь по пентабазису», но с нюансом.
Ух, премудрые пескари какие. Всех-всех победили. Нужно больше такого на самом деле. Даже обидно, что пожалели бюджетную копейку, не сделали 99,9%.
Зашивайся, ретушируй, заливай ботов, подвози курганских армян, делай самые-самые красив…
Теперь хочу вставить пять копеек по поводу участившихся на фоне выборов разговоров о «конфликте» между уехавшими и оставшимися.
Множество людей покинуло страну, в том числе, например, среди моих друзей. Немалое количество лиц транслирует свою позицию, которую вполне можно назвать адекватной, особенно от фигур, не отметившихся в калоедстве начиная с 22-го года. По ту сторону их немного, но они есть.
А вот фронтир вс…
Голосование относительно грядущих «выборов» завайпано ботами. Цифры за правящую партию буквально несколько процентов не дотягивают до ВЦИОМовских.
Да, я в курсе про опцию сделать голосование только для подписчиков канала, но хотелось получить максимально широкий результат. Демократия, панимаиш. Наивный...
Они подвергают обструкции волеизъявление даже на одной из самых свободных платформ мира, и какой платформе — кр…
«Когда хотела выложить видео из Чечни и донести, что там добрые люди, но не поняла, почему посыпались такие комментарии»
— Ненавижу вас и презираю! Девушек убивают чуть что а эти «кьонахи» шляются с шалавами
— Наташки вы для чеченцев максимум можете быть насадками на член и то пару раз!
— Эту свиноту отправьте домой
— От лица чеченцев — вам тут никто не рад!
— ВАМ РУССКИМ НИКТО НЕ РАД
— Наташки нам не нужны езж…
В Ингушетии казнили «колдуна» и «повелителя джиннов»
Троих мужчин задержали по подозрению в убийстве 52-летнего жителя Сунжи. Убийцы были уверены: сосед «заколдовал» родственника одного из них и «вселил в него джинна».
Колдуна покойного тоже проверить надо на всякий случай. Может, там целый склад очень мощных гри-гри, дюжина скальпов альбиносов, шесть амулетов Иблиса — тогда, по сути, все правильно, и братья сработ…
Мария Захарова:
«Какие-то третьи силы, которые хотят внести раздор между Россией и Азербайджаном, возложили цветы в Киеве в честь погибших ВСУшников».
Ровно год назад та же Захарова:
«СБУ собирается использовать текущие, эм... Противоречия... Нынешнего момента... Чтобы разжигать вражду [между РФ и Азербайджаном]. Нам известно о планах задействовать перебежчиков из России, готовых за деньги под российским флагом со…
ФОМ:
▪️70% россиян доверяют Владимиру Путину, — лишь в пределах 1% что-то там переливается между 15% «затрудняющихся ответить» и 15% «недовольных». А вот тревожность существенно возросла: 57% встревоженных, хотя еще в феврале их якобы было всего 38% против 56% спокойных.
▪️«Единая Россия» держится на 35% поддержки, КПРФ упала на один пункт до 10%, то же самое с ЛДПР и НЛ, потерявших один пункт до 6%. А вот СРЗП хот…
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @polpotkids. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 64,506 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Утенок Пол Пота” (@polpotkids), 6,387 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polpotkids.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
