Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

RAG&E - Razvedos Advanced Gear & Equipment

@razvedosaa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

137,456subscribers

+163 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001159629950
TypeChannel
Username@razvedosaa
Description❗️Номер для регистрации канала: 4934447214 Если надо объяснять, значит буду объяснять. И да пребудет со мной Сила! Обратная связь, а также жалобы, предложения и замечания направлять сюда: @aaarazvedos
Created13 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/razvedosaa

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

137,293137,456137,374.56 August 2026 — 137,293 subscribers6 August 2026 — 137,293 subscribers7 August 2026 — 137,343 subscribers7 August 2026 — 137,318 subscribers8 August 2026 — 137,337 subscribers9 August 2026 — 137,422 subscribers10 August 2026 — 137,446 subscribers11 August 2026 — 137,426 subscribers12 August 2026 — 137,435 subscribers13 August 2026 — 137,456 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +163. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137,269–137,480 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:26137,456+21
12 Aug 2026, 17:36137,435+9
11 Aug 2026, 18:03137,426-20
10 Aug 2026, 19:17137,446+24
9 Aug 2026, 22:21137,422+85
8 Aug 2026, 23:05137,337+19
7 Aug 2026, 21:58137,318-25
7 Aug 2026, 00:13137,343+50
6 Aug 2026, 01:31137,293no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:52137,293first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 137,456 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,400
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held57 (2 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total1,278,560
Reactions total13,630
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,500
Videos
1,370
Links
5,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 15s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12,701 reactions across 51 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7,47058.8%
2,84222.4%
🔥1,46911.6%
👏8696.84%
🥰510.402%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,630reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,082
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 57 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
1,010
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @razvedosaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈5,860 views57 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Угроза терроризма для нашего Государства остро стоит уже не первое десятилетие, но сегодня она «заиграла новыми красками», ибо приходится противостоять не столько фанатикам, сколько специальным службам враждебных государств. Механизм вербовки отлажен настолько, что сегодня потенциальным террористом может стать любой или почти любой гражданин – Ваш друг, коллега или родственник. https://vkvideo.ru/video-231090610_456

👍3520👏2

13 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈10,500 views82 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Благодаря WARGA, я наконец-то разжился подсумком JSTA Pouch от Spiritus System: https://t.me/warga/10121 Он объединяет функционал магазинных подсумков (вмещает один АR-образный магазин и один пистолетный) и «утилитарки» (его содержимое каждый определяет в меру собственной фантазии). В теории, такое конструкторское решение позволяет экономить место на разгрузочном поясе и для тактического формата (тир, полигон, поли

👍6510👏4🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈11,000 views147 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

Тема сегодняшнего совещания в «ДИВАННОМ ШТАБЕ» - терроризм. И мы подошли к нему максимально ответственно, поэтому разговор получился не только интересным, но и полезным. Релиз ожидается во второй половине дня – не пропустите ✊🏻 И да пребудет с Вами Сила!

👍108🔥2113👏4🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈11,100 views127 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @PMC_book

ПОГНАЛИ ✊ https://youtu.be/tbU0Oj91IaA?si=vWoz7G_iI9dtLng_

🔥85👍318👏3

13 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC≈13,200 views230 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Уникальная упоротость отдельных представителей «тусовки» (ровно, как и пытающихся к ней всеми силами примазаться) давно не удивляет – они «художники и так видят»(с) Но их тупорылая паства не перестает веселить. Итак! Если ты учился стрелять очередями у Александра Ивановича Петрова (Царствие ему Небесное и светлая память), то о каком «естественном положении тела» тогда говоришь?! В изготовке стоя от Александра Иванов

👍18827🔥7👏5🥰3

12 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC≈17,900 views92 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ОБРАТНАЯ СВЯЗЬ (часть четвертая/ август 2026) - новое видео уже на СПОНСОРе: https://sponsr.ru/razvedos/ Как говорится: спрашивали – отвечаем! Ответы на Ваши вопросы, собранные под этим роликом: https://sponsr.ru/razvedos/173891/OBRASHCHENIE_K_ZRITELYAM/ Если Вы не видите своего вопроса, значит я его сразу удалил, чтобы не терять время на зачитывание, ибо отвечать на него не планирую. Однако, вопросов все равно мн

👍848

12 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈20,000 views93 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Сегодня, в рамках совещания «ДИВАННОГО ШТАБА» поговорили про OSINT. Основной вывод - действительно хороших OSINT-еров мало. Но тут, дабы сложить один и один, до хуя ума не надо: https://t.me/bbbreaking/235546

👍8210👏1

12 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈21,200 views712 reactions1,010 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

С Днем ВВС! ▪️Видят Боги - я не хотел, но раз такое дело…

447👍207🔥35👏23

12 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈21,200 views300 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

«Военный Осведомитель», в рамках очередной публикации, подвел промежуточный итог эпопеи «О КАЗе»: https://t.me/milinfolive/177376 Внезапно, но комплекс активной защиты оказался эффективным против дронов и что особенно интересно – это признает противник. По его словам, КАЗ «АРЕНА-М» одного из танков уничтожил 7 FPV-дронов. А всего для уничтожения одного танка в том бою противник тратил от 15 до 20 дронов – на мой взг

👍236🔥3226👏6

12 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC≈20,300 views292 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Российская армия, как и ее предшественница – Советская, всегда славилась широким многообразием техники, стоящей на вооружении. Были годы, когда только боевых машин пехоты одновременно эксплуатировалось три разных образца, а танков и того больше. К слову, ничего хорошего в этом нет, но речь сейчас про другое. ВСУ времен СВО, применительно к озвученному вопросу, переплюнули всех и эту «пальму первенства» теперь вряд л

👍23238👏20🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈18,700 views78 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Жду новинки от АКАДЕМИИ СНАРЯЖЕНИЯ, а именно – мембранную куртку «АЛЬФА»: https://academygear.ru/category/product/membrannaya-takticheskaya-kurtka-alfa-akademiya-snaryazheniya/ И летнее худи: https://academygear.ru/category/product/khudi-layt-akademiya-snaryazheniya/ А пока они едут немного повыебываемся тактическими сандалиями от SALOMON: https://academygear.ru/category/product/sandalii-takticheskie-rx-break-force

👍717

11 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC≈24,700 views170 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#МИНУТКА_ТАКТИЧЕСКОЙ_ГРАМОТНОСТИ: ОПЯТЬ О ПЛАНИРОВАНИИ Как Вы уже знаете из предыдущей заметки, даже просто копать по-военному охуенно сложно и дело не только во вражеских землекопах. Представьте, что надо копать и Вы копаете изо всех сил, отмахиваясь лопатой от врагов со всей пролетарской ненавистью, но не там. То есть выбранное и указанное для раскопок место – ошибка. Не поверите, но военные в своей мудрости зашли

👍13517🔥11👏7

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @razvedosaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 6,111 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

APEX
@apex_wear · 5,536
3 posts
Гилли-мастерская «Болотная Мята»
@myataXghillie · 874
3 posts
Строгий режим
@opasnyrecidiv · 5
3 posts
Склад Шальняка
@shalnyakstore · 1,986
3 posts
Алексей Суконкин
@A_S_Sukonkin · 41,065
2 posts
АнтДеф
@antdefense · 1,167
2 posts
Диванный спецнаZ
@divannyi_special · 5,861
2 posts
PROX.BLOG
@proxblog · 18
2 posts
Стрелковый клуб "Тысячная"
@sub986 · 2,106
2 posts
VIY
@viy_tm · 165
2 posts
Архив Group 🇷🇺
@archivegroup_russia · 707
1 post
ПРОГРЕССОР
@BKPROGRESSor · 12,635
1 post
Книги, которые я прочитал
@bookwave · 57
1 post
Edgar’s reading vault
@edgars_reading · 21
1 post
Федерация АТС РТ
@fatsrt · 489
1 post
Bad Gringo
@gringo_patch · 2,350
1 post
ЗАМЕТКИ ИНСТРУКТОРА © 👊🏼Илья Овсянников
@Instruktor_Ilya_Ovsyannikov · 9,687
1 post
ЦИРК - Крым (ЦЕНТР ИНФОРМАЦИИ и РАЗВИТИЯ КАЦИВЕЛИ).
@katciveli_2_0_circus · 48
1 post
MZ 🇷🇺 Краматорск
@kramatorsk3 · 8,009
1 post
Кузьмичи💪🤙
@Kuzmichi24 · 547
1 post
Легенда47
@Legend47_unofficial · 23
1 post
ВОЙНА Z.
@novosti2022s · 41
1 post
Pax Russica - Deus Lo Vult | Помощь Новороссии
@Pax_Russica · 90
1 post
Не люблю не справедливость
@seg85 · 4
1 post
ТАКТИЧЕСКИЕ СНАЙПЕРСКИЕ СИСТЕМЫ
@TSSrifles · 1,729
1 post
Дивный новый мир
@WestAnother · 6
1 post
Патриот
@ya_patriot_ru · 6
1 post
“ОБРЯЗШИЕ СЕВЕР” прод. ZemlyaSlavyan
@zemlyaslavyan · 45
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

List of accidents and incidents involving the Ilyushin Il-18 (en.wikipedia.org)
“…{{Cite web |title=RAG&E - Razvedos Advanced Gear & Equipment |url=https://t.me/razvedosaa/5880 |access-date=2023-06-25 |website=Telegram}} 8 crew…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RAG&E - Razvedos Advanced Gear & Equipment” (@razvedosaa), 137,456 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razvedosaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.