Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кухня черносотенца

Channel

Кухня черносотенца

@chernaya100kitchen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,485subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001066909747
TypeChannel
Username@chernaya100kitchen
Created21 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chernaya100kitchen

Growth

6,4856,5116,4985 August 2026 — 6,502 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,502 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,501 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,511 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,501 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,485 subscribers5 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,481–6,515 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:546,485-16
13 Aug 2026, 03:146,501-10
9 Aug 2026, 18:256,511+10
6 Aug 2026, 15:426,501-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:196,502no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:086,502first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.3%
avg views ÷ 6,485 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,530
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held16 (26 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total66,359
Reactions total863
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,062 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍22020.7%
🔥21220.0%
21019.8%
🤣14813.9%
🫡575.37%
🤯504.71%
👏484.52%
custom 5341716951351706120413.86%
👎353.30%
141.32%
😢60.565%
💅50.471%
😇50.471%
🍓40.377%
🤔40.377%
🎉30.282%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,062reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chernaya100kitchen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC592 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ivorytowers

В этом году я не смог сходить на деньрожденную вечеринку "Листвы" в стиле нулевых с почти настоящей Ксенией Собчак — потому что мы снимали клип "Республики Фиуме", и закончили далеко за полночь. Но я был на почти всех предыдущих днях рождения моего любимого книжного. И очень хочу быть на следующем. Я уже сказал много нежных слов лавке Димы Бастракова, поэтому, наверное, буду повторяться. Диме удалось невозможное:

16👍9💅4

8 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈4,310 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Меж тем 6 лет как, Кристина Андреевна, не угадали! https://t.me/krispotupchik/1941

🔥37🤣30custom 534171695135170612017

8 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC977 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ksbchk

Ого! А я прям ничо была такая))) https://t.me/listva_books_msk/17847

16👍8🤣6🔥5custom 53417169513517061201

8 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈5,720 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Московской Листве 6 лет По случаю даты — в лавке сегодня легкомысленная вечеринка в стиле свободных нулевых. Если раньше любое наше праздничное мероприятие несло национально-патриотический флёр и пафос, то сейчас — только подчёркнуто тусовочный тон. Слишком серьёзное время, чтобы говорить о чём-то всерьёз. Просматривая фотографии с открытия 6 лет назад кружится голова — насколько же это было давно, насколько же изм

58🔥24🫡11🤣5🎉3👍1👎1🤔1

8 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,230 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вчера выяснилось, что у меня три рукопожатия до Гитлера.

🤣5314🍓3👍1

4 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC≈1,310 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rightsofnationPhoto

Добровольца Русской Весны Михаила Филатова хотят упрятать за решетку по Проблеме-500. Просим поддержки военно-гражданского общества. Мы неоднократно писали о Проблеме-500, с которой столкнулись многие российские добровольцы, воевавшие в составе Народных милиций ДНР и ЛНР до 2023 года. Отправившись воевать в тогда ещё независимые республики, они оказались записаны задним числом в штат ВС РФ, когда новые регионы интег

👍2613👎2🤣1

30 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC≈2,550 views146 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @chernaya100Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥86🫡42👍13🤣4👏1

29 Jul 2026, 22:45 UTC≈29,200 views220 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Знаете, а ведь ещё чуть-чуть, и у нас не останется работающих слов для обозначения реального зла и угроз. Семантическая инфляция «терроризма», «экстремизма» и «иноагенства» не оставит нам шанса, когда появится реальный волк, мы просто не будем знать, как его назвать. Обессмысливание тяжёлых слов, превращение их в смешное конфетти, уравнивание тех, кто по нам стреляет, с теми, кто просто не согласен с линией партии —

👍121🤣38👏2421🔥14👎1🫡1

28 Jul 2026, 19:19 UTC≈2,450 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @chernaya100Photo

♥️ Снова ищем финансовых партнёров, разделяющих наши ценности Мы бесперебойно работаем с 2013 года, начинали и росли естественно, с нуля, без сторонних вложений. В 2013 году нас было 2 человека, сейчас — 35, а если включать волонтёров и «Гойда-студию» — больше 50. Мы смогли пережить все кризисы последних 13 лет и решительно намерены продолжать развиваться и дальше, что бы ни происходило в политике и экономике. Сто

👏19😢6👎4🤣21

27 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC≈14,100 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Москва, у кого-нибудь в офисе есть сканер А3? Нужно отсканировать важный газетный архив, потребуется доступ на пару смен. Готовые помочь, черкните в личные сообщения канал! Спасибо! UPD: вопрос решён!

👍12👎3🤔3

26 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTC≈1,950 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @listva_tsPhoto

«Что делать?» — спросил нетерпеливый петербургский юноша. — Как что делать: если это лето — чистить ягоды и варить варенье; если зима — пить с этим вареньем чай. Культовая фраза принадлежит Василию Васильевичу Розанову — писателю, чьё имя навсегда связано с русским летом, чаем и нашей лавкой: книга «Опавшие листья» подарила название и нашим книжными магазинам, и издательству. Раскрыть томик Розанова где-нибудь в ра

37😇4👎2🔥2🤣2🍓1💅1

23 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,970 views32 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @listva_bookPhoto

😱 Объявляем предзаказ на новую книгу! Впервые на русском языке — «Оборона Дурацкого Брода» Эрнеста Данлопа Суинтона. Лучше Норина 🫡 могут быть только ДВА Норина 🫡🫡, решили мы, и взялись издавать «Оборону Дурацкого Брода». Именно так в переводе братьев Нориных звучит название небольшой книги The Defence of Duffer’s Drift. Повествование посвящено Англо-бурской войне и может восприниматься и как учебник по тактике ма

🔥205🤣5👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @chernaya100kitchen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,974 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ИА "Стекломой"
@ia_steklomoy · 110,746
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
историк-алкоголик
@istrkalkglk · 121,726
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кухня черносотенца” (@chernaya100kitchen), 6,485 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chernaya100kitchen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.