National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 142 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 97 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,470–16,608 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 12:50
16,570
+2
8 Nov 2026, 23:15
16,568
+3
7 Nov 2026, 14:55
16,565
-3
6 Nov 2026, 15:09
16,568
-1
5 Nov 2026, 12:36
16,569
-12
4 Nov 2026, 09:01
16,581
+3
3 Nov 2026, 08:16
16,578
+2
2 Nov 2026, 05:10
16,576
-1
1 Nov 2026, 07:29
16,577
+10
31 Oct 2026, 09:11
16,567
+55
29 Oct 2026, 02:50
16,512
+5
27 Oct 2026, 02:07
16,507
-5
26 Oct 2026, 02:55
16,512
-1
24 Oct 2026, 05:09
16,513
+6
23 Oct 2026, 02:39
16,507
+6
22 Oct 2026, 01:32
16,501
+4
20 Oct 2026, 16:58
16,497
+1
19 Oct 2026, 13:35
16,496
-10
18 Oct 2026, 12:38
16,506
+19
17 Oct 2026, 09:27
16,487
first reading
Engagement
212 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.3%
avg views ÷ 16,570 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,860
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
67
of 212 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
212 (31 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
392,410
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 18:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,820
Videos
≈1,190
Links
≈11,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
39m 58s
Average length
1m 54s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (11.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Отче Наш, да святится имя Твоё, да светится панель контрольная, Отче Наш, преврати мой полёт в подобие танца. Пусти в царствие небесное меня, стрелка твоего Вольного. Мы по образу серафимов Твоих, мы — святая Твоя авиация.
Эту песню мы записывали с Сайгой, с ней же и исполним на концерте. Ну а здесь можно послушать и посмотреть, как она звучит с нашей Юлей. Для тех, кто хочет в хорошем качестве:
Youtube
VK
Ну а б…
Европа проиграла войну Украине и теперь должна платить репарации. Видимо, логика такая. На свою армию они хотят 70 лярдов в год — это три годовых бюджета Эстонии.
https://t.me/grpzdc/90085
И я там исполню Отче наш. Для меня это песня с очень особой и личной историей. А одну фразу из этой песни я использую теперь в жизни.
https://t.me/Ivorytowers/25132
Скажите, а есть ли на свете место, свободное от запрещённого в России гомогея Игоря Синяка? Как так получилось, что он везде, от первого канала до канала Марии Бароновой? Этак мы с вами точно никаких традиционных ценностей не сварим.
Канал проекта RT #НеОдинНаОдин появился в «Дзене».
Там собраны истории людей, которые сталкиваются с несправедливостью. Журналисты RT добиваются решения их проблем.
Так, в рамках проекта RT добивается предоставления положенного по закону жилья сиротам и семьям с детьми-инвалидами. Совместно с прокуратурой и органами опеки возвращает изъятых из семьи детей. Работает с проблемами участников СВО. Компетентные органы, …
Глупый какой депутат. Иди сюда, давай объясню.
Во-первых, приедет 4500 гостей, то есть примерно половина населения Таллина. Скорее всего, такие же дармоеды депутаты, которым оплатят проезд, проживание и блэкджек с хохлухами. Тебя, депутат, за глупые вопросы не пригласят.
Во-вторых и в-главных: они могут до чего-то договориться и начать «восстанавливать» Украину, не закончив войну. Представляешь, какие возможности? …
Французскому писателю Мишелю Уэльбеку предъявлены обвинения «в соучастии в подстрекательстве к дискриминации, ненависти или насилию». Об этом сообщает Le Figaro со ссылкой на знакомые с делом источники.
Преследование 70-летнего писателя было инициировано прокурором Французской республики после жалоб Союза мечетей Франции (UMF) и Движения против расизма и за дружбу между народами (MRAP) еще в январе 2023 года. Поводо…
Аня Долгарева — одна из самых важных современных поэтов.
Ее вписывают в Z-поэзию, хотя она совершенно не про это. Она — поэт военного времени. Поэт, опалённый войной и постоянно возвращающийся к огню, её опалившему. Это требует смелости — а Аня смелая.
Я был на её концерте в 16 тоннах и видел, как она держит немаленький зал. На следующий пойду — и вы приходите тоже. Аня крутая.
https://t.me/dolgareva/1041
Когда нужно было сносить ГДР, на Западе рассказывали про страшную Штази, которая буквально сводит с ума своих граждан. Это была так называемая программа Zersetzung («Разложение») от 1976 года.
Агенты проникали в квартиры настоящих и мнимых диссидентов и не только обыскивали их тайно, но и переставляли вещи, мебель, меняли данные на приборах и в будильнике — и так далее. Чтобы вызвать у человека паранойю. И похоронит…
ОБРАТНАЯ ПЕРСПЕКТИВА
Я определился в с моим фаворитом из сериальных новинок этого сезона. Вот он, есть на ИВИ. Может, появится что-то лучше, но пока этот мини-сериал на первой строчке личного топа. Коллеги писали, что сериал сложно задуман, но в действительности идея довольно простая. 4 серии — это 4 дня в эпоху начала СВО. Действие этих 4 дней разбегается на несколько линий повествования. Вот женщина (Елена Панова)…
Вообще, делать презентацию некоторых проектов в Донецке — это очень хорошая традиция. Про "рэп-взвод" я писал два раза, оба критически, но это не отменяет факта, что люди делают очень хорошее дело.
https://t.me/andreymikheev/4383
Showing the 12 most recent of 212 posts we hold for @Ivorytowers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Ivorytowers edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Опрос для тех, кто немного знаком с творчеством «Республики Фиуме». У нас сняты на видео несколько песен в живом исполнении, старых и новых. Какую выкладываю следующей?
Реакция11%
Tristesse Royale33%
Отче Наш22%
Новую — на стихи Изотова20%
Новую — про 24 февраля 2022 года29%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 47 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Ivorytowers named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 10 posts, 11 August 2026 – 6 November 2026
@special_authors named in 10 posts, 8 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Александр Пелевин Z @comradepelevin · 19,905 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
real cultras @real_cultras · 24,160 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Под лед @podled · 34,718 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
Fire walks with me @chaoss_flame · 53,777 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
FYTW @fuckyouthatswhy · 24,055 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
Мышь в овощном @kbrvdvkr · 79,547 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Мальцовская Галерея @malzoffsgallery · 30,703 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Обыкновенный царизм @ordinaryczarizm · 43,501 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Доктор Z прописал @docpro · 142,165 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
ИА "Стекломой" @ia_steklomoy · 108,641 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
На кухне у повара @kitchen_chef · 86,559 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Комиссар Исчезает @komissarischezaet · 30,985 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Анна Долгарева | Стихи @dolgareva · 19,615 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026
Норин @norinea · 40,665 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
АНТОН ВЯЧЕСЛАВОВИЧ @krasovkin · 54,811 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
историк-алкоголик @istrkalkglk · 123,361 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Егор Холмогоров @holmogor_talks · 19,484 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
Primakov @evgenyprimakov · 19,432 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026
Всевидящее око @oko_ok · 127,365 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Мюсли вслух @mysly · 159,857 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fantastic Plastic Machine” (@Ivorytowers), 16,570 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ivorytowers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
