Channel
@Ivorytowers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,567subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001131389182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ivorytowers |
| Description | Кремлевская башня слоновой кости Контакт: @Ivory_tower_bot Отвечаю только пользователям, чье имя не скрыто |
| Created | 10 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ivorytowers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 16,567 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 16,573 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 16,581 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 16,585 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 16,590 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 16,592 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 16,591 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 16,591 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 184,350 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Мир без хохлов — это чудесный мир без наглости, хамства и без террора. В контексте приведённой новости, правда, пытливый читатель может добавить: а без французов? Без французов — тоже, в целом, пойдёт. Без французской философии и французской революции будет уж точно лучше, чем с ними. Но есть, с другой стороны, литература и музыка. Бриджит Бардо, Серж Генсбур, Стендаль, Дюма-отец и Дюма-сын. "Последнее танго в Париж…
Что касаается Инстасамки и её бегства в Дубайск — то совершенно не понимаю возмущений. Даша, как честная девушка, с порога предупредила о том, что она за деньги да. Какие вопросы могут быть к ней, непонятно. Также непонятны возмущения тех, кто говорит, что, мол, лучше бы все эти бюджетные средства достались какому-нибудь искреннему партиоту. Окей, давайте представим себе такого патриота, который действительно хоче…
Какой еще колобок? Не знаю никакого колобка. https://t.me/Sulphur_and_cats/3651
Ладно, давайте всерьёз про "Яблоко". Уроженец Львова и воспитанник харьковско коммуны-колонии ОГПУ, Григорий Явлинский — грустный цирковой ослик, который уже 30 лет выходит на манеж, чтобы пробежать свой круг и снова удалиться. В этом году пробежать не дали. А если б дали, то — что? Прыгнул бы в оркестровую яму, лягнул бы тромбониста и укусил дирижёра? Не смешите. Если вы думаете, что мне нравятся наши выборы, то н…
Хотя на самом деле, всё было ради другого. Просто очень хотелось иметь электронную почту DAnnunzio@fiume.art
Ансамбль «Республика Фиуме» сделал себе сайт, где беззастенчиво сообщает, что называет свою музыку «национал-бурлеском». Рад, что созданное мною Учение идёт в широкие массы, овладевает умами и сердцами, стремительно взмывая к своему общероссийскому триумфу. Всё больше апостолов распространяют Свет Истины. Да будет так! А сайт вот: https://fiume.art
Как вы уже поняли, у нас в Республике царит оживление. Мы сняли невероятно красивое видео на новую песню, мы репетируем материал, который войдёт в новый альбом и который мы будем исполнять на концертах. Ну и ещё кое-что. Во-первых, у нас теперь есть сайт. Может, это не то, что нужно группе в 2026 году, но я не мог себе отказать в удовольствии выкупить домен fiume.art. Так что всем добро пожаловать! Во-вторых, к наш…
Слушанья по снятию с выборов партии "Яблоко" оставили ощущение, будто я это всё уже видел. И впрямь: клип "Розовый фламинго" Алены Свиридовой и Cream Soda. Самая последняя сцена.
Да говно ваше «Яблоко». Снимут и слава Богу.
То, о чём я неоднократно писал. Одна из проблем нашего миграционного законодательства: его абсолютная непонятность для приезжего. То, что Джастас говорит, совершенно логично. Просрочили. Заплатили штраф. Что ещё надо-то? От себя добавлю: ему крупно повезло, что штраф выписали сразу. За некоторыми приходится стоять в очереди. В общем, не буду оригинален: миграционному законоательству нужна реформа, направленная на т…
Знiщено. Эффективность наших ударов растет, но ещё есть над чем работать. По молочке— ааагонь!!!
Разумеется, я в своём уме и не буду смотреть ни «Колобка», ни «Чебурашку», ни прочие сказки с миллионными бюджетами и пряничной графикой. Не осуждаю. Просто не вижу ни одной причины, зачем. Но надо признать: пиарщики вольно или невольно сделали так, что Колобка обсуждают все, даже (и в особенности) те, кто его не смотрел. По нынешним временам это достижение. Отечественные киноделы разделились не на «за» или «против»…
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @Ivorytowers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Ivorytowers edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 13,873 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Ivorytowers named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fantastic Plastic Machine” (@Ivorytowers), 16,567 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ivorytowers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.