Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ТЫЛ-22

@tyl_22

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,285subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001444840974
TypeChannel
Username@tyl_22
Created5 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tyl_22

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,2807,2857,282.56 August 2026 — 7,280 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,280 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,282 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,285 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,279–7,286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:027,285+3
8 Aug 2026, 23:507,282+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:077,280no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:497,280first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.89%
avg views ÷ 7,285 subscribers
Avg views / post
721
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (9 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,162
Reactions total95
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 26s
Average length
3m 13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,593 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢1,27149.0%
🤯52520.2%
🙏29611.4%
1907.33%
🫡843.24%
🔥772.97%
👍662.55%
😁391.50%
👎281.08%
🎉100.386%
🙊40.154%
👏20.077%
🤪10.039%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,593reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tyl_22. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC294 views32 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @chernaya100kitchenPhoto

Московской Листве 6 лет По случаю даты — в лавке сегодня легкомысленная вечеринка в стиле свободных нулевых. Если раньше любое наше праздничное мероприятие несло национально-патриотический флёр и пафос, то сейчас — только подчёркнуто тусовочный тон. Слишком серьёзное время, чтобы говорить о чём-то всерьёз. Просматривая фотографии с открытия 6 лет назад кружится голова — насколько же это было давно, насколько же изм

21😁6🔥5

4 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC668 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rightsofnationPhoto

Добровольца Русской Весны Михаила Филатова хотят упрятать за решетку по Проблеме-500. Просим поддержки военно-гражданского общества. Мы неоднократно писали о Проблеме-500, с которой столкнулись многие российские добровольцы, воевавшие в составе Народных милиций ДНР и ЛНР до 2023 года. Отправившись воевать в тогда ещё независимые республики, они оказались записаны задним числом в штат ВС РФ, когда новые регионы интег

🙏1812👍3👎1

19 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,200 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @juchkovskyPhoto

Добрый вечер! В июле мы собирали на десять раций Гранита. Но срочно понадобился ретранслятор Куст. Поэтому сейчас решили брать пять раций и Куст. На это потратили 570 тысяч: 5 раций по 65 т., Куст за 180 т., к нему АКБ за 50 т. и зарядка за 15 т. Обычно красим Куст в зелёный цвет и маскируем, собственно, под куст. Сейчас ставим в другой местности, поэтому покрасили в серый. Что у нас со сбором в целом? Собрали ро

🫡11👍75🙏4👎2

10 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,530 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @SewaSewastopolPhoto

Об украинских FPV в Севастополе, охоте на МОГи, ждунах и потребностях защитников севастопольского неба: – Только сбили мы "Лютый", собираемся менять локацию, как начал пищать дрон-детектор – сигнал приближается, а дрона не видно. – Прежде чем мы сбили "Лютого" он успел сбросить и навести на нас FPV… – Я увидел его когда до него оставалось 30 метров, отстреливаться уже нет времени, врасыпную, отбегаю в лесопосадку –

🙏335👎2🤯1

10 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC≈27,200 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Неделя за неделей, месяц за месяцем – постепенно переоснащаем в 11 инженерной бригаде радиосвязь – с китайской Кирисан на русскую Гранит. Из заявленных ещё в прошлом году 11 миллионов собрали 7,7 млн. (потратили 7,4 млн – все отчёты у Жучковского). Осталось собрать 3,3 млн. Сейчас планируется заказать десять раций Гранита за 650 тыс. Реквизиты ниже. А кто хочет помочь криптовалютой – кошельки на сайте тыл-22.рф/гра

🙏20👍7🫡5👎2

6 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,390 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @chernaya100Photo

⚡️ Ищем авторов для 3 тома «Книги Z», посвящённого 2024 военному году Писательские навыки желательны, но при наличии эксклюзивной истории необязательны — сделаем материал через серию интервью. ⚠️ Разыскиваем: — Русских солдат, переживших украинский плен. — Русских релокантов без русофобских ересей в голове: интересные личные истории людей, на фоне событий 2022 года покинувших страну. — Европейцев или американце

👍17🔥6👎41🤪1

21 Jun 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,810 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @juchkovskyPhoto

Здравствуйте! Возобновляю радиовещание после месячного перерыва, связанного с отпуском. По военной обстановке с нашей стороны за это время значительных изменений не произошло. Со стороны же противника происходит постоянное наращивание применения БПЛА. Перемещение по основным дорогам Донбасса на всю глубину становится всё более затруднительным. Наши детекторы и мобильные РЭБы часто не справляются и требуют техническ

👍11🫡94👎2

18 Jun 2026, 13:39 UTC≈2,460 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Замотались и совсем забыли отчитаться за апрельский сбор на ремонт броневика для бойцов 11 инженерной бригады. Исправляемся. Броневик починен и возвращён в строй, бойцы довольны, видеоблагодарность и акты-чеки выполненных работ прикладываем. Раз уж мы вышли на связь: несмотря на наше молчание, работа по помощи фронту не останавливается ни на неделю, но всё чаще мы выступаем не как сборщики средств, а как прокси-серв

🫡159👎2😢1

31 May 2026, 17:02 UTC≈232,000 views2,147 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Печальные новости, из-за глупого преследования Юрия Ускова останавливается производство «Сотников» — стратегически важных радиоустройств, позволяющих перевести боевые машины, танки и артиллерию на современную цифровую связь (да, в основном мы до сих пор используем на век отставший аналоговый хлам). Производство полностью финансировалось Юрием, подавляющая часть оборудования поставлялась бесплатно, остальная — по себ

😢1,270🤯524🙏22152😁33🔥21🎉10👍6

21 May 2026, 07:05 UTC≈34,000 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наши войска продолжают грызть Славянское направление, а наш друг и коллега А. Жучковский – поставлять «мечи джедая» и другое радиооборудование для 11 инженерной бригады. 11 бригада поддерживает наступательные действия инженерной разведкой местности, наведением понтонных переправ и дистанционным минированием при помощи дронов. Мы же поддерживаем лучшую инженерную бригаду лучшей цифровой радиосвязью, на которую с осе

33👍15🫡5👎3

20 May 2026, 17:43 UTC≈25,600 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Велик был год и страшен был год по рождестве Христовом 2022, и самым грозным событием первой его части стала Битва за Мариуполь, продолжавшаяся 86 дней. Мир не видел подобной схватки с окончания Второй Великой войны. Впрочем, что – мир... Когда наша гуманитарная миссия работала там, на месте, снабжая жителей сотрясаемого взрывами города лекарствами, одеждой и продовольствием, «мир» представлялся нам чем-то далёким и

29🫡12👎4

9 May 2026, 14:22 UTC≈3,470 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥28🫡1710👎4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @tyl_22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 179,547 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТЫЛ-22” (@tyl_22), 7,285 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tyl_22.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.