Сегодня годовщина вторжения ВСУ в Курскую область. На видео лишь вершина айсберга, что творили эти животные с нашими мирными людьми. Никто не забыт, каждый должен ответить. Подписаться | Предложить новость

Channel
ВОЙСКА ДЯДИ ВАСИ
@nashatemaz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
755subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001709582680 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nashatemaz |
| Created | 3 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nashatemaz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 755 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 755 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.6%
- avg views ÷ 755 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 87.3
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.50%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 873 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,680
- Videos
- ≈3,580
- Links
- ≈2,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 01s
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
❗️Весёлого молочника Джастаса Уокера выгоняют из России Джастас уже несколько раз пытался получить гражданство РФ, но ему всегда отказывали. Сегодня, по его словам, ему поступило уведомление из УФМС об аннулировании ВНЖ и последующем выдворении Уокер живёт в России с 1994 года, он женился на россиянке и здесь родились его дети. Зато всяким обезьянам на раз выдают гражданство
🤯1
А тем временем наши подразделения методично продолжают выносить судоходство быв. Украины во временно оккупированной Одессе. Чтобы вы понимали, судоходство в Ормузском проливе закончилось после пары пораженных кораблей. Тут счёт пошёл как бы не на третий десяток и всё равно каждый день с упорством сумасшедшего грузоотправители пытаются прорваться в порты. Это даёт понимание важности Одессы и моря. И на сколько большие…
Дронодел пойман, сообщает ЦОС ФСБ России Житель Крыма у себя дома на 3D-принтере печатал детали для дронов по заданию украинских спецслужб Его завербовал сотрудник СБУ. Сначала он передавал данные о передвижении военной техники на полуострове. После по заданию куратора организовал у себя производство и сборку дронов – в том числе тех, что могут сбрасывать взрывные устройства. На 3D-принтерах он делал комлпектующие…
Момент атаки украинского дрона по пляжу в Геленджике. БС в TG ✊ | БС в МАХ 🤫
😢1
Я бы начал вот с чего: 1. Принятие того, что нет "русскоязычных украинцев", есть русские. Хватит бороться за права "русскоязычных украинцев", зачем мы сами вычеркиваем людей из числа русских? Не понятно почему до сих пор этим занимается наша официальная дипломатия. Тогда появляется хоть какая-то концепция СВО. Мы говорим жителям, условного Харькова: "Для нас вы русские люди. Сейчас вы находитесь в оккупации хунты, за…
❤1
Замечание по поводу "наша остроумная диверсия - их гнусный теракт" и "вы не понимаете, это другое". Особенность теракта на Кудринской состоит в том, что подрыв был произведен сознательно, в момент, когда стало ясно, что бомбу сейчас найдут. Военных в этот момент рядом не было, военные не погибли. Таким образом, у человека, который привел в действие бомбу, изначальная военная цель уже не была актуальной, и он совершил…
❤1💯1
С днём ВДВ! Подписаться | Предложить новость
👍2
🖌День Воздушно-десантных войск 96 лет назад на учениях под Воронежем состоялась первая в СССР высадка группы десантников на парашютах. Этот день считается датой основания отечественных Воздушно-десантных войск. С того момента ВДВ участвовали практически во всех войнах и вооруженных конфликтах, которые выпали на долю России, зачастую находясь на самом острие и громя численно превосходящего противника. В контексте С…
❤1
Не забудут парни в голубых тельняшках Не забудет гвардия службу в ВДВ! С праздником!
🔥2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @nashatemaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@nashatemaz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВОЙСКА ДЯДИ ВАСИ” (@nashatemaz), 755 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nashatemaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.