11 measurements spanning 8 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,061–12,089 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:53
12,076
-5
13 Aug 2026, 02:14
12,081
-5
12 Aug 2026, 00:08
12,086
+6
11 Aug 2026, 03:25
12,080
+6
10 Aug 2026, 05:20
12,074
+8
9 Aug 2026, 08:21
12,066
-2
8 Aug 2026, 10:38
12,068
+4
7 Aug 2026, 12:07
12,064
-10
6 Aug 2026, 12:00
12,074
+10
6 Aug 2026, 02:34
12,064
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:22
12,064
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 12,076 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,670
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
65 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
108,261
Reactions total
2,206
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,029 reactions across 60 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
610
30.1%
💯
423
20.8%
🫡
333
16.4%
👍
244
12.0%
🤨
93
4.58%
🔥
86
4.24%
❤🔥
83
4.09%
🤬
63
3.10%
🌚
55
2.71%
🤔
39
1.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 65 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cs_association_0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💬НОВАЯ СТАТЬЯ!
⚡️⚡️⚡️ПОТОМКИ ОЛОНХО: ОРДА НАСТУПАЕТ НА ЗАПАД.
⚔️Якуты были в Чечне, теперь якуты воюют на Украине. Через зону СВО прошли тысячи выходцев далекой Сахи, однако только одно подразделение стало самым интересным и по-настоящему реликтовым. С первых своих дней они воюют на Харьковщине и застали абсолютно все боевые операции в регионе, их командир получил Героя России, а за отличие, показанное в боях, им р…
Забавно, что все давно забытое возвращается обратно. Пиратство как явление должно жить, это чертовски весело. Все мы выросли на историях про Черную Бороду, капитана Уильяма Кида и Джека Рэкхема. Пришло время закосплеить давно забытое старое и придать ему новый вид.
Просто прикиньте как круто: на Кубе открылась Тортуга, где русские ушкуйники пьют ром и тискают латинок после успешного нападения на танкер с европейским…
⚡️Подобрал вам истории про самых необычных оружейных баронов, которые отличаются не столько своими авантюрами, но и выразительными биографиями.
✅Вчерашний сотрудник Пентагона решил, что может зарабатывать больше и пошел ва-банк: начал продавать советское оружие из Восточной Европы, а после вторжения армии США в Ирак присосался к новой войне. Доступа к складам ему не дали, однако мужик не расстроился и начал мутить б…
Ладно, теперь о трагичном. Сегодня 26-я годовщина "она утонула".
В этот день в 2000 году ПЛАРК "Курск" 3-го поколения "Антей" навсегда ушла под воду.
После о случившемся долго будут врать
Расскажет ли комиссия, как трудно умирать.
Кто из нас ровесники, кто герой, кто чмо,
Капитан Колесников пишет нам письмо.
Новый отзыв подъехал по сбору.
Да, насчёт маленьких ошибок есть нюанс: пишу не в Ворде, где ошибки могут подчеркиваться, а сразу в Спонсор, а оттуда - вам. Там ничего не подчёркивается и поэтому не замечается. При нахождении неточностей их сразу исправляю. Особенно если материал на 50+ страниц (что уже как миникнижка). Не всегда заметно.
Во всем остальном - большое спасибо за поддержку!
А ты принял участие в сборе…
Я уже говорил и ещё раз повторю: Украина оттягивает неизбежное. При всех обсерах и дидовизме РФ все равно если не додавит, то переживет соседа.
И это то, что понимает любой здравомыслящий человек. Единственный выход у Украины, это сесть за стол переговоров и пойти на уступки. Собственно говоря у РФ точно также, придется пойти на уступки. В отличие от ресурсов РФ у Украины такого нет и не будет. Высушится под ноль.
Албанские боевики 164-й бригады Армии освобождения Косова вытаскивают раненого однополчанина во время битвы за гору Паштрик на границе Албании и Косова и Метохии, июнь 1999 года.
Весьма прикольно, что этот боевик был ранен, возможно, во время действий русских групп, среди которых действовал и будущий Герой России Анатолий Лебедь. В те дни 549-я моторизованная бригада югославской армии под руководством полковника Бож…
Ну а произошедшее в Новороссийске можно трактовать только одним: военное преступление, удар по жилым постройкам. Погиб ребенок, ещё несколько детей были ранены.
Это, на самом деле, хорошо для российской мести и спуска эмоциональной злобы. Сейчас будет пинг-понг и убьют украинских детей и женщин, думаю, что ударят по городам центральной Украины. Я думаю в течение суток-двух. Скольких убьют - посчитаем позже.
Сами зн…
Предлагаю всем тем, кто хочет захватывать суда западных стран в мировых водах для начала захватить хотя бы американское рыболовное судно на границе с Аляской.
Начать надо хотя бы с малого, потому что танкеры вы все равно у Запада захватывать не будете. Могли бы - уже захватили. Пока Владимир Владимирович грозится отвечать зеркально, напомню, западные спецназы захватили уже кучу российских судов без каких-либо пробле…
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @cs_association_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 143,889 of 1,339,933entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎙КОГДА ЗАПЕЛИ ПУШКИ | КЗП” (@cs_association_0), 12,076 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cs_association_0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.