Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net +82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,244–11,361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 08:36
11,347
+19
19 Sept 2026, 08:19
11,328
-4
16 Sept 2026, 20:21
11,332
+10
15 Sept 2026, 00:18
11,322
-4
13 Sept 2026, 12:55
11,326
-9
11 Sept 2026, 19:00
11,335
+5
9 Sept 2026, 05:41
11,330
-3
5 Sept 2026, 22:40
11,333
-4
3 Sept 2026, 21:16
11,337
+11
2 Sept 2026, 11:43
11,326
+1
1 Sept 2026, 11:14
11,325
+7
31 Aug 2026, 08:57
11,318
+6
30 Aug 2026, 12:05
11,312
-2
29 Aug 2026, 13:14
11,314
+6
28 Aug 2026, 14:34
11,308
+2
27 Aug 2026, 16:05
11,306
+12
26 Aug 2026, 13:22
11,294
-3
25 Aug 2026, 15:03
11,297
+8
24 Aug 2026, 11:57
11,289
+5
22 Aug 2026, 22:28
11,284
first reading
Engagement
179 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 11,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,800
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 179 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
179 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
70,340
Reactions total
707
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 48s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,617 reactions across 162 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
516
14.3%
custom 5274113612061875228
497
13.7%
👍
463
12.8%
🤣
437
12.1%
🤬
437
12.1%
❤
367
10.1%
🔥
272
7.52%
😁
133
3.68%
👎
126
3.48%
🤯
120
3.32%
😱
108
2.99%
🙈
20
0.553%
😡
17
0.47%
👌
15
0.415%
🗿
15
0.415%
😢
15
0.415%
⚡
14
0.387%
🙏
12
0.332%
👏
9
0.249%
🤝
9
0.249%
3 further kinds
15
0.415%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 174 of the 179 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,066 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 179 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 179 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marketplace_biz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 179 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.23%
4 of 179 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,930
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,110
over 175 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjc8ahE3
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
2W5zFGNoVAh
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
2W5zFHDRGZf
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2W5zFHM9MpD
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 179 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Коллеги-блогеры, у кого ещё сохранилась связь с пресс-службой WB, задайте им, пожалуйста, этот вопрос.
Почему «технические проблемы» с выплатами месяцами возникают у российских продавцов, а у селлеров из других стран их нет?
Мне кажется, пресс-служба здесь попадёт в своеобразный цугцванг.🤔
Если проблема действительно техническая — почему она касается только российских селлеров?
Если не техническая — тогда в чём р…
Amazon обвинили в том, что он годами незаметно разгонял стоимость рекламы для селлеров
Федеральная торговая комиссия США и генпрокуроры 22 штатов подали иск против Amazon.
По версии регуляторов, маркетплейс больше семи лет скрытно повышал минимальные цены в рекламных аукционах. Селлеры и бренды продолжали участвовать в торгах, не понимая, что сама площадка искусственно двигает нижнюю границу стоимости рекламы.🤥
Ре…
М.Видео начал брать деньги с покупателей за отказы от заказов
Пока это тест для небольшой группы клиентов, которые регулярно заказывают товары, но выкупают меньше 20%.
Если такой покупатель дождался доставки, а потом отказался от товара или вообще не пришёл за ним, с него могут взять 100 ₽ за обратную логистику.
Мне такой подход нравится.👌
За логистику в любом случае кто-то платит. И я не понимаю, почему продавец…
Wildberries начал показывать селлерам, сколько их товара находилось на складах в момент атак
В WB Partners появляется новый «Отчёт о пострадавших товарах».
Для каждого пострадавшего объекта будет отдельный PDF: наименование товара, номенклатура WB, артикул продавца и количество единиц, которые, по данным Wildberries, находились там на момент ЧП.
Документ нужный. Но есть один вопрос.🤔
Последние годы у селлеров рег…
Платежный сервис Platron приглашает к сотрудничеству. Мы соединили многолетний опыт на финансовом рынке с гибкостью новой технологической архитектуры.
Она включает:
⚔️ многоуровневую защиту от DDoS-атак;
🆔 поведенческий анализ транзакций для выявления аномалий в реальном времени;
🛅 шифрование данных по протоколам нового поколения.
Сервис помогает бизнесу:
✅ выстраивать бесперебойный прием платежей;
✅ повышать конве…
Ozon предлагает российским селлерам вывезти товар на склады в Казахстан
Ozon приглашает продавцов размещаться по FBO в Алматы и Астане.
И это не только ради продаж в Казахстане и Кыргызстане. Со складов в Казахстане Ozon собирается доставлять товары обратно покупателям в России.
Например, до Екатеринбурга обещают в среднем 4–5 дней.
До 30 сентября кросс-докинг в Алматы и Астану бесплатный. Ограничений по количест…
У Wildberries нашлась новая причина задержки выплат
Раньше продавцам поддержка который месяц рассказывала про «технические проблемы» с выводом денег.
Теперь пресс-служба WB объяснила, что задержки связаны с мерами безопасности из-за DDoS-атак на систему «Баланс продавца».🤥
Технические проблемы, получается, победили. Пришли DDoS-атаки.
Когда речь идёт о задержке денег тысяч предпринимателей, может ли Wildberries к…
Коллеги, мне тут пишут, что у селлеров из Белоруссии, Китая и Кыргызстана никаких "технических проблем" при выводе денег с WildBerries нет. Деньги приходили и приходят в обозначенный в оферте срок.
С "техническими проблемами" почему-то уже который месяц подряд сталкиваются именно российские продавцы🤔
Если у вас плохо прогружаются файлы, все посты также доступны в MAX
Ozon вышел ещё в одну страну — теперь в Монголию
С сегодняшнего дня жители Монголии могут заказывать на Ozon более 90 млн товаров.
На первом этапе доставка будет занимать до 10 дней 🤔, а получать заказы покупатели смогут в отделениях Почты Монголии.
Для российских селлеров это ещё один рынок, куда теоретически можно продавать через уже знакомую площадку.
Монголия стала девятой страной за пределами России, где Ozo…
Как изменилась структура вашей выручки за последний месяц?
Выросла доля Ozon41%
Выросла доля Wildberries3%
Выросла доля других маркетплейсов3%
Выросла доля продаж через свой сайт/соцсети4%
Выручка упала по всем каналам из-за сбоев логистики27%
Структура доходов не изменилась22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 179 posts we hold for @marketplace_biz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой канал продаж сейчас является для вас основным?
Торгую только на Wildberries9%
Торгую только на Ozon24%
Использую гибридную модель Wildberries + Ozon20%
Мультиканальная модель: WB, Ozon + другие маркетплейсы/каналы34%
Wildberries + другие каналы, без Ozon2%
Ozon + другие каналы, без Wildberries10%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 179 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MPGO @mpgo_ru · 81,388 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
Ozon Marketplace @ozonmarketplace · 110,003 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
Ozon HQ @ozonhq · 29,397 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Владислав Бакальчук @WBakalchuk · 47,669 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Будни Маркетплейсов @mp_week · 20,881 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 25 September 2026
Татьяна Ким @kimtatyana2024 · 89,644 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
Ozon Реклама @ozon_adv · 22,713 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
Wildberries News @wildberriesofficialcustomer · 48,446 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
Из коммерса в е-коммерса @hikollegi · 56,161 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
WB ПВЗ Новости. Менеджеры @wbpvzlearning · 98,526 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 16 August 2026
Кухня Маркетплейсов @vsedlyamp · 56,583 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
WB Партнёры @wbsellerofficial · 181,939 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
Wildbox.News @wildbox_news · 87,145 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
Хогвартс маркетплейсов @marketplace_hogwarts · 59,002 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Ozon и партнёры ПВЗ @ozonapvz · 67,264 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
JOYCITY 🇨🇳 | Закупки и логистика из Китая @joycitychina · 29,862 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
Т-Бизнес секреты: онлайн-продажи, маркетплейсы, ecom @bs_marketplace · 27,012 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
Рома Райт @romarayt · 47,448 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
MPSTATS @analyticsmpstats · 21,381 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
Ozon Team @ozonteam · 22,918 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marketplace_biz” (@marketplace_biz), 11,347 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marketplace_biz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.