Channel
@adindex_live
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,715subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001361980613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @adindex_live |
| Created | 15 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adindex_live |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 5,715 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 5,708 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 5,701 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 5,697 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 5,697 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 53,794 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
66 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 19 | 28.8% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 25.8% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 22.7% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 16.7% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Текст и изображения, созданные Claude, будут помечаться невидимыми для человека водяными знаками. Метаданные сохраняются при копировании и редактировании. Согласно Кодексу прозрачности ЕС, водяной знак коснется всех нейросетей, выпущенных после 2 августа AdIndexTechLive ⚡️
🔥1
Марианна Медведева, «Эгис»: «В фармацевтических кампаниях даже самая прорывная идея может протухнуть за время бесконечных согласований» Член жюри премии «Проксима» менеджер по развитию цифрового канала коммуникации Egis Марианна Медведева в медиаформате «Вопрос эффективности» рассказала: ▪️Почему в фарме критически важно понимать специфику сегмента. ▪️В какой момент нужно резать рекламный бюджет на площадке, а в к…
Posted without readable text
«Бургер Кинг» объединил программу лояльности и маркетинговые коммуникации на платформе Mindbox. Это позволит точнее сегментировать аудиторию, персонализировать сообщения и развивать механики лояльности в дальнейшем AdIndexTechLive ⚡️
🔥1
ИИ-ассистент OpenClaw на базе Claude AI самостоятельно нашел уязвимость в системе бронирования спортзала и отменил чужую запись, чтобы продвинуть своего пользователя в очереди. Это первым случай автономной кибератаки в Австралии AdIndexTechLive ⚡️
❤4
💼 Собрали обновления в кабинете рекламодателя. «Авито Реклама» добавила таргетинг по ключевым словам, а «Яндекс» получил права на продажу рекламы на медиафасаде в Москве. Переходите, чтобы быть в курсе главных изменений инвентаря и инструментария за последнюю неделю #КабинетРекламодателя 🥰 @adindex
Российский рынок искусственного интеллекта по итогам 2025 года достиг 316,1 млрд рублей, прибавив 29,7% к 2024 году. Аналитики прогнозируют, что к 2030 году показатель может увеличиться до 830 млрд рублей AdIndexTechLive ⚡️
T2 AdTech ввел должность директора по маркетингу — раньше ее в компании не было. На эту позицию вышла Дарья Волохова с 10 августа. Ее руководитель — Татьяна Ковалевская (Долдо) 😁 Сайт | Сетка | LinkedIn | Телеграм
👍1
Posted without readable text
Контент нужен всем, а полноценная редакция по карману немногим. Если маленькая команда хочет публиковать тексты регулярно, но не готова держать редактора, авторов и корректора, рабочую схему можно собрать вокруг одного человека и настроенной нейросети — правда, кнопки «сделать хорошо» в ней не будет. Как настроить процессы, в колонке для AdIndex рассказал Гоша Копьев, руководитель коммерческой редакции «Пикабу» AdI…
Posted without readable text
🔥3
Есть три ограничения для продвижения в социальных сетях, считают аналитики WARC. Маркетологи попадают в ловушку: гонятся за виральностью, оптимизируют контент под алгоритмы, а устойчивый рост, согласно данным, это не приносит. Исследование выявило три барьера, которые мешают кампаниям в соцсетях работать вдолгую AdIndexTechLive ⚡️
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @adindex_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 107,675 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚡️AdIndex ТехЛайф” (@adindex_live), 5,715 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adindex_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.