Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MEDIA RESEARCHES

Channel

MEDIA RESEARCHES

@mediaresearchesanalytics

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,741subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001386416189
TypeChannel
Username@mediaresearchesanalytics
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mediaresearchesanalytics

Growth

17,70517,74417,724.56 August 2026 — 17,705 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,705 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,721 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,726 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,720 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,721 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,731 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,734 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,744 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,741 subscribers17,7416 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,699–17,750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:1417,741-3
14 Aug 2026, 05:0817,744+10
11 Aug 2026, 17:5417,734+3
10 Aug 2026, 18:3117,731+10
9 Aug 2026, 18:1817,721+1
8 Aug 2026, 21:4117,720-6
7 Aug 2026, 18:1817,726+5
6 Aug 2026, 17:3017,721+16
6 Aug 2026, 02:1717,705no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:1117,705first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.26%
avg views ÷ 17,741 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.713%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held38 (3 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total41,106
Reactions total293
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

285 reactions across 36 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7325.6%
🔥7124.9%
5619.6%
🥰4917.2%
😁186.32%
👍51.75%
👾31.05%
🤣31.05%
🤡20.702%
🤨20.702%
🌚10.351%
🤔10.351%
🥴10.351%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC224 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

RNC Pharma: Российский фармритейл. Причины падения и основные точки роста в 1-2 кв. 2026 года Содержание: ➡️ Объём и динамика розничного рынка ➡️ Региональные особенности (рынок по ФО и СФ, оценка состояния рынка отдельных городов России) ➡️ Цены (динамика средних цен, ценовая сегментация рынка) ➡️ Конкурентная среда (основные группы, торговые марки и производители) ➡️ Состояние инфраструктуры розничного рынка (сре

1🥰1

14 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC667 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Офлайн становится местом для впечатлений Трафик в ТЦ и магазинах снижается, время визита сокращается, но запрос на офлайн-развлечения продолжает расти. В 2025 году рынок офлайн-мероприятий прибавил 28%, а на 2026 год прогнозируется еще +15%. Офлайн становится более функциональным: 🤔 44% приходят посмотреть, потрогать или примерить товар 🤔 38% — быстро купить необходимое рядом с домом или по пути 🤔 Каждый пятый

32🔥2🥰1

14 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC741 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @mediares_videoPhoto

👀 Какие онлайн-кинотеатры россияне знают и готовы рекомендовать Узнаваемость крупнейших видеосервисов уже очень высокая: каждый из пяти ведущих брендов знаком более чем 4 из 5 опрошенных. Но знание бренда, удовлетворенность сервисом и лояльность распределяются между игроками по-разному. Если попросить пользователей самостоятельно назвать известные им онлайн-кинотеатры: 💬 Okko — 68,5% 💬 «Иви» — 62,1% 💬 «Кинопоиск

32🔥2🥰1

14 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC872 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

📔 Sensor Tower: Digital Market Index, Q2 2026. Discover the latest trends of the quarter across mobile apps, digital advertising, and web Content: 🔣 Mobile Market Overview 🔣 Top Markets 🔣 Top Categories 🔣 Top Apps 🔣 Top Mobile Games 🔣 Digital Advertising Overview 🔣 Retail Media Advertising Snapshot 🔣 Web Usage Overview #приложения #mobile MEDIA RESEARCHES 💬 Мы в MAX 🙃 Мы в Сетке

32🔥2🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC964 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Из-за чего подписываются и отписываются от блогеров ▫️ Личные истории и экспертность остаются главными точками притяжения аудитории. По опросу «Дзена», 39% россиян предпочитают авторов с запоминающимися историями, еще 32% — экспертов в конкретных областях. Что заставляет возвращаться к контенту: 🟣 34% — чувство юмора автора 🟣 21% — нестандартный взгляд на привычные темы 🟣 17% — узнаваемый авторский стиль и пода

33🔥3🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,020 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Продажи июля 2026 года по новостройкам Новой Москвы ТОП-5 проекта и их девелопера: 🤩 Саларьево Парк (ПИК) 🤩 Новые Смыслы (Unikey) 🤩 Родные кварталы (А101) 🤩 Литературный квартал (Самолет) 🤩 Тропарево парк (Самолет) #недвижимость #продажи MEDIA RESEARCHES 💬 Мы в MAX 🙃 Мы в Сетке

3🔥32🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈1,100 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Смотрю ленту, никого не трогаю - и вдруг встречаю до боли знакомый визуал 👀 MEDIA RESEARCHES 💬 Мы в MAX 🙃 Мы в Сетке

😁14🔥52🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC≈1,220 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

📔 DSM Group: Фармацевтический рынок России, 1 полугодие 2026 #фарма #обзорырынка MEDIA RESEARCHES 💬 Мы в MAX 🙃 Мы в Сетке

🔥211👍1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈2,050 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Креатив влияет на окупаемость рекламы сильнее площадки 🔣 Mutinex проанализировала 66 611 кампаний и оценила влияние рекламы на продажи. На креатив пришлось 54% различий в ROAS — больше, чем на канал, формат или площадку. 🔣 замена только креатива меняла ROAS в среднем на 48% 🔣 в 25% случаев новый креатив увеличивал окупаемость более чем в 2 раза 🔣 ТОП-10% креативов показывали эффективность в 3–6 раз выше, чем сре

🔥32🥰2

12 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,070 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Продажи новостроек старой Москвы остаются ниже прошлогодних В июле 2026 года на первичном рынке старой Москвы зарегистрировали 3 378 сделок с физлицами. За месяц показатель почти не изменился — +2% к июню, однако к июлю 2025 года продажи сократились почти на 32%. В деньгах снижение заметно меньше: 🟣 108 млрд рублей — выручка за июль, лишь на 8,5% ниже показателей июля 2025 и 2024 годов 🟣 496 тыс. рублей — средн

3🥰32🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTCviews —

MEDIA RESEARCHES pinned «⚡️ MR: Точка зрения — Татьяна Сопенко, исполнительный директор ПЦ BlogoSphere ℹ️ Инфлюенсер 4.0: почему эпоха универсальных блогеров заканчивается Рынок инфлюенс-маркетинга прошел путь от первых YouTube-авторов, которые вели блоги скорее как способ самовыражения…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @mediaresearchesanalytics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 37,009 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

MediaMarket
@pomarketu · 33
4 posts
VODоворOTT
@vodott · 14,697
3 posts
CRMLOVE. От первого касания до прочных отношений 💙
@crmlove · 425
2 posts
Рейтинг Рунета
@ratingruneta · 6,921
2 posts
SobMaExpo (IPLS)
@SobMaExpo · 476
2 posts
Агрегатор новостей: Маркетинг, Реклама, PR
@ads_mark · 50
1 post
Рыжие инсайты про эдтех | Авилкина
@avilkina_redbananas · 142
1 post
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,151,356
1 post
ЖП
@conversationpiece · 862
1 post
Культуры и компьютеры - Заметки Михаила Конинина
@cultures_and_computers · 2
1 post
Кудрявый медийщик
@curlymedia · 249
1 post
Ало, это стратегия!
@epin_smm · 271
1 post
Халяль | Этичные Инвестиции
@finans_islam · 1,268
1 post
FAMILY — Creators & Innovators
@indafamily · 516
1 post
Лукатворный
@lucreator · 180
1 post
Сикорский. Маркетинг смыслов
@MarketingOfMeanings · 1,075
1 post
Хитрый план Б
@marketingpro2022 · 60
1 post
МК.Диджитал | Маркетинговое бутик-агентство полного цикла
@mk_digital_ad · 219
1 post
RETAIL EXPERT
@retail_expert · 378
1 post
Наука, Образование, Интернет, Технологии - агрегатор
@tech_inet_telecom · 53
1 post
ТРАНСМЕДИА
@tmmskru · 166
1 post
treeeends | канал про тренды и будущее
@treeeends · 223
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СберМаркетинг
@sbermarketing · 210,147
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,183
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Корнеев | Первый Маркетинговый
@pervmarketing · 139,711
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MEDIA RESEARCHES” (@mediaresearchesanalytics), 17,741 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediaresearchesanalytics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.