Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for A Toda Potencia | Irán - Israel | Ucrania - Rusia

Channel

A Toda Potencia | Irán - Israel | Ucrania - Rusia

@atodapotencia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

44,321subscribers

-267 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669876161
TypeChannel
Username@atodapotencia
DescriptionConflictos actuales, armamento moderno, análisis geoestratégico e historia militar. Información rigurosa, clara y directa sobre lo que realmente importa en el frente y los intereses detrás. Para que entiendas los conflictos más allá de los titulares.
Created1 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/atodapotencia

Growth

44,32144,58844,454.56 August 2026 — 44,588 subscribers6 August 2026 — 44,588 subscribers6 August 2026 — 44,572 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,504 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,477 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,458 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,449 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,428 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,403 subscribers13 August 2026 — 44,357 subscribers14 August 2026 — 44,321 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -267. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,281–44,628 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:3844,321-36
13 Aug 2026, 11:1444,357-46
12 Aug 2026, 08:4344,403-25
11 Aug 2026, 10:1344,428-21
10 Aug 2026, 09:4144,449-9
9 Aug 2026, 13:1144,458-19
8 Aug 2026, 14:2244,477-27
7 Aug 2026, 15:2144,504-68
6 Aug 2026, 15:1644,572-16
6 Aug 2026, 03:1544,588no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:0744,588first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.68%
avg views ÷ 44,321 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,410
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held83 (3 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total282,620
Reactions total10,690
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10,100
Videos
4,430
Links
2,580

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 07s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,657 reactions across 76 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,23533.5%
1,17112.1%
🤣8228.51%
😁6646.88%
👏5365.55%
🔥4354.50%
🤬4314.46%
🤡3133.24%
💩2842.94%
🤮2612.70%
🫡2232.31%
🤔2222.30%
👎1821.88%
💯1681.74%
🥴1561.62%
1161.20%
👀910.942%
🏆800.828%
🥱740.766%
🤨310.321%
28 further kinds1621.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,690reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 83 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @atodapotencia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC≈1,370 views78 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇷🇺🇸🇷🇺 La inteligencia de Francia revela por qué los Patriot perdieron el juego al gato y el ratón con los Iskander-M rusos Parte 2/2: ¿qué lograron revelar los franceses? En la parte anterior del análisis hemos comentado que la inteligencia francesa está particularmente interesada en determinar las razones por las que los sistemas Patriot resultaron tan poco eficaces contra los misiles balísticos 9M723 del sistema

😁56🤣12👍82

15 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,820 views74 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺Los invitamos a suscribirse al canal Político/Militar " Los Sombreros Blancos Z" con información en tiempo real sobre lo que sucede en las líneas de fuego Comparte 👉🏻🔗https://t.me/ophiucu

👍6014

15 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,880 views92 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇷🇺🇸🇷🇺 La inteligencia de Francia revela por qué los Patriot perdieron el juego al gato y el ratón con los Iskander-M rusos Parte 1/2: ¿por qué esto preocupa tanto a los franceses? Uno de los misiles interceptores más caros del planeta (si no el más caro), el PAC-3MSE, cuesta tanto por una buena razón. Es un producto de alta precisión perfecto para la interceptación cinética (por medio de un golpe físico sin explos

😁6611👍11🔥3🤡1

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,930 views139 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

🇮🇷🇺🇸 La ley del más fuerte: Irán responde a Trump con un elocuente mensaje sobre Ormuz En uno de sus discursos ante militares, el presidente de EEUU aseguró que declararía el estrecho de Ormuz territorio estadounidense "una vez le hayamos asestado una derrota a Irán, una muy fea derrota". Según él, Washington ya controla el paso de los barcos por el estrecho y continúa bloqueando los puertos iraníes. Desde Teherán

👍89💯299🔥5👏3😁3🥱1

15 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC≈2,260 views135 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

🇨🇳🇯🇵 China advierte a Japón: los intentos de restaurar el militarismo terminarán en otra derrota histórica Hace 81 años, el carro del militarismo japonés fue finalmente detenido por la rendición incondicional de Japón. El mito estadounidense le atribuye la derrota a los bombardeos de Hiroshima y Nagasaki, omitiendo que Tokio aceptó la rendición solo después de que las tropas soviéticas destruyeran sus fuerzas en tie

👍96👏22💯114🔥1🤔1

15 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC≈2,760 views146 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺🛡️🇺🇦 Moscú explica por qué ya no va a detener su avance y en qué condiciones lo haría Al día de hoy, Rusia considera inviable congelar el conflicto con Ucrania en la actual línea de combate, afirmó el ministro de Exteriores de Rusia, Serguéi Lavrov. Y es que, recordemos, Moscú ya accedió varias veces a detener su operación militar especial, para (como pensaban) crear un ambiente de diálogo saludable. Pero esas pau

🫡79👍42👏12💯54👀3👌1

14 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC≈2,650 views98 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🔍🇨🇳 Sobre la creciente presencia militar de China en Eurasia y el Indo-Pacífico China continúa ampliando y diversificando su cooperación militar con países de distintas regiones, combinando ejercicios bilaterales de fuerzas aéreas, operaciones de tropas especiales y maniobras navales. En apenas unos días, el EPL participó en actividades conjuntas con Tailandia, Bielorrusia e Indonesia, desde el entrenamiento de comb

👍71👏1511👀1

14 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC≈2,420 views85 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥52🥴209👍2🤪1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC≈2,420 views85 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥51🥴188👍5🕊2😁1

14 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈2,440 views56 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

📂 ¡Explora nuestro catálogo exclusivo de canales en español! 📢 ¿Te interesa la geopolítica, la política, las noticias globales, la economía y más? ¡Hemos creado un catálogo especial de canales en inglés solo para ti! Si buscas análisis profundos, noticias de última hora o la opinión de expertos, nuestro catálogo lo tiene todo. 👉 AÑADE CANALES Si te interesa formar parte de este catálogo, contáctanos por Mensaje D

37👍19

14 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈2,480 views132 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🛡️❓🇮🇷 ¿Han destruido la industria militar iraní, dicen? Pues parece que los persas disponen de otros datos Las imágenes de un lote de drones iraníes incautados en Irak muestran algo sumamente interesante debido a los números de serie que están claramente visibles en ellos. Así, a partir de estos números se puede determinar que algunos de los drones suicidas Shahed-101 y Shahed-107 que ven en estas fotos fueron fabr

👍86👏18😁136🤔3🔥21🏆1

14 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,540 views120 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸🦩🇮🇷 No solo misiles: la flota de drones estadounidenses se ha visto gravemente mermada por Irán La herramienta favorita de los militares estadounidenses de los últimos años, los drones de altitud y alcance intermedio MQ-9 Reaper, que utilizaban contra sus enemigos, resultó ser un blanco relativamente fácil para los persas. Según las fuentes de The Washington Post, EEUU ya perdió unos 45 de estos drones, lo cual s

👍92👏146🔥5🤣2👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @atodapotencia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@atodapotencia edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 109,657 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Liu Sivaya
@liusivaya · 130,699
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Sabías que?
@sabiasque · 163,388
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
⚠️ ARMAPEDIA - NOTICIAS EN VIVO - SIN CENSURA
@armapedia · 179,741
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
Buzz💡 Datos interesantes
@buzzdatos · 123,906
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
ENTRE GUERRAS
@entre_guerras · 137,612
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Tips de Telegram
@TelegramTipsES · 1,542,340
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Canal Patria Digital
@PatriaDigital · 329,481
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Nicolás Maduro
@NicolasMaduroMoros · 98,647
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“A Toda Potencia | Irán - Israel | Ucrania - Rusia” (@atodapotencia), 44,321 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atodapotencia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.