Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Luffy’s diary

Channel

Luffy’s diary

@Luffysgemcalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,865subscribers

-308 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001452778226
TypeChannel
Username@Luffysgemcalls
DescriptionJoin luffy’s adventure to find the newest gems! Hop on board! Contact: @TheLuffygems Twitter: @TheLuffygems
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Luffysgemcalls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,86511,17611,020.57 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net -308. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,818–11,223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 10:3710,865-5
9 Nov 2026, 17:0810,870-5
8 Nov 2026, 09:4410,875-6
6 Nov 2026, 02:3910,881-7
5 Nov 2026, 01:1810,888-5
4 Nov 2026, 02:0110,893-7
3 Nov 2026, 04:4910,900-2
2 Nov 2026, 03:4710,902+7
1 Nov 2026, 01:2010,895+9
31 Oct 2026, 02:4910,886+1
30 Oct 2026, 03:1510,885-7
29 Oct 2026, 00:4510,892-3
27 Oct 2026, 20:4610,895-2
26 Oct 2026, 22:2110,897+1
25 Oct 2026, 19:4110,896-8
24 Oct 2026, 18:5910,904-1
23 Oct 2026, 19:3510,905+8
22 Oct 2026, 21:1510,897-8
21 Oct 2026, 16:2910,905-5
20 Oct 2026, 11:3610,910first reading

Engagement

272 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.42%
avg views ÷ 10,865 subscribers
Avg views / post
480
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.387%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 272 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held272 (4 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total20,152
Reactions total78
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 22:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,770
Videos
≈426
Links
≈6,150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
58s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

479 reactions across 243 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤37578.3%
🔥265.43%
👍183.76%
😱91.88%
👌61.25%
👏61.25%
😁51.04%
🥰40.835%
🌭30.626%
💯30.626%
🙏30.626%
🤔30.626%
🤷30.626%
😐20.418%
😭20.418%
🙈20.418%
🫡20.418%
❤‍🔥10.209%
👀10.209%
💔10.209%
4 further kinds40.835%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 245 of the 272 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 479 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 272 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 04:59 UTC352 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🥚MUSEGOTCHI🥚 Insane NFT project with team building this for a while now. Giving me old school mooner vibes. Mint, farm, breed and grow the 7 unique Muses on the farm and enter a new frontier for NFTs MINT DATE: NOV 9 1PM EST /18:00 UTC https://musegotchi.org https://x.com/musegotchi/status/2119615098688033111?a=6k7qRVEZq--8QYJ90TA&s=46

❤2🤔2

8 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC427 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Pray for better market next week cuz this shit is INSANELY ded

❤1🙏1

6 Nov 2026, 17:37 UTC571 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$DODO super strong. Can see this going way higher

🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 19:04 UTC610 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Aped Coge as well. Lets make mainnet great again 0x1be66209376355eff07875ec91ebc3d84a523993 https://x.com/NYCMayor/status/2118413834356457724?s=20

❤1

5 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC613 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$ALFA Alfaclub is aiming to be FOMO x Friendtech, and offer one-click crosschain social trading, with integrated private chats. They built the full stack themselves over 18 months, and are even building their own custom router, to fully capture all fee income, similar to FOMO. HL Perps trading just launched There are very few competitors that offer such a polished SocialFi and trading experience, and none of them …

❤2

5 Nov 2026, 11:06 UTC542 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026

DAMN CR7 retiring after that Portugal fiasco

💔1🥰1

4 Nov 2026, 13:57 UTC575 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 272 posts we hold for @Luffysgemcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Luffysgemcalls edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Eric Cryptomans Journal
@erics_calls · 30,755
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,084
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Shill Seals
@ShillSeals · 18,678
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 October 2026
- ETH -
@lowtaxethx · 17,230
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026
🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 | LionCalls.io
@LionCALL · 68,066
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls · 53,621
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
ETH LP Lock, Burn
@ethsafesniper · 26,216
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,000
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
CaesarsCalls
@Caesars_Calls · 38,088
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 28,242
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
EZ Money’s Gems 💎
@EZMoneyCalls · 22,915
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,943
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Luffy’s diary” (@Luffysgemcalls), 10,865 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Luffysgemcalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.