Anyone hit anything from MetaWin’s risk free $1,000? I saw they gave away $680k to like 2,000 people Looks like their size basically doubled over night This is why they’re the only casino I play on They’re one of the only places you can actually instantly withdraw when you win If you’re going to gamble, make sure you do it on metawin.com

Channel
The Don's Calls
@TheDonsCalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,350subscribers
-1,100 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001549666977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheDonsCalls |
| Description | The official channel of The Don’s Calls. The last of a dying breed. Nothing written here is financial advice. A journal of some of my trades. Disclaimer: https://t.me/TheDonsCalls/5006 Business & Promo: @thedonshiller |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheDonsCalls |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 17:11 | 12,350 | -19 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 18:08 | 12,369 | -22 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:48 | 12,391 | -22 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 12,413 | -16 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:01 | 12,429 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:16 | 12,436 | -11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:20 | 12,447 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:18 | 12,452 | -37 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:56 | 12,489 | -20 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:50 | 12,509 | -21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 12,530 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:26 | 12,542 | -12 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:50 | 12,554 | -17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:49 | 12,571 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:07 | 12,587 | -13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 12,600 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:54 | 12,610 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 12,630 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 12,638 | -15 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 12,653 | first reading |
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.0%
- avg views ÷ 12,350 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,730
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 60 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (28 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 39,833 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,210
- Videos
- ≈97
- Links
- ≈3,430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 27s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (56.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Just a reminder for those seeking a reliable and fast trading terminal — I have been using Cove. It's USDC based so you can trade on SOL/ETH/Base/RH and cross all major chains without having to bridge or swap. Give it a try, its excellent: https://t.me/cove_trading_bot?start=ref_thedonshiller
$nuLL Nullary on SOL. Unique launchpad with a privacy focus. Tokens starts with "???" and gets updated later based on the teams desires. This helps remove snipers and drives revenue to the pad. Team has had success in the past and like that the chart is starting to gain some momentum. Half of its share of every trading fee on its coins buys $nuLL and burns it. The supply is fixed at 1,000,000,000 with no mint autho…
5x for $MAMESUKE. The new episode went live this morning. The most viral shiba on the planet. The doge founder started engaging with Mamesuke posts as well. New ATH and moving well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfpGREDK4Go
3x for $MAMESUKE. Another runner here for @thedonscalls. 2M tagged and a new ATH. The official Shib X account just followed Mamesuke. Shib did 40B. Lots of upside here.
2x for $MAMESUKE. The viral Shiba is reviving the space. The third episode premiers tomorrow. 1.5M smacked.
$MAMESUKE running hard. Listed on Gate alpha already. Volume nutty and momentum picking up. Some Stonk whales/ good FOMO wallets bidding and looks ready for 1M+. https://www.gate.com/alpha/sol-SCGBBnSwnekytGFHgyeHHxPMiN7xDxsWFGg9JgFSTNK
$MAMESUKE The most viral shib worldwide. A Japanese Icon, this post is going extremely viral on x, already 16M in two days. Find entries, fresh launch. DYOR. https://x.com/shun_k33/status/2116318475669078191 https://dexscreener.com/solana/hpexrue5msv7paz5wpviwsclesywgzr8vhdakuiep5ku
$REBATE ran 8x for us tagging 2M MC at ATH. Entries here for those who are sidelined. Team has a lot of experience pushing plays for the long haul and despite the poor market conditions $REBATE still sits well above our entries. Expecting new catalysts and pad features to create more hype and attention for this to climb back to ATH and beyond. For those who missed it, it's probably the most innovative pad currentl…
I’ve stacked a good amount of entries to this You earn a free entry everyday by logging into metawin.com And you earn more entries by depositing / wagering If you gamble make sure you do it on MetaWin this weekend, you get a free chance to win part of $250k
8x for $REBATE. 2M tagged overnight and looking like its going to have the next major leg anytime now. New catalysts getting released and people starting to take notice of the utility/features and unique concepts $REBATE has to offer. Some really good wallets entering as well.
5x for $REBATE. Milly rocking and going higher.
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @TheDonsCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TheDonsCalls edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 26 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 31 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CallAnalyser · 50,3149 postsCall Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol · 27,0674 postsThe Don’s Degens
@degensgems · 14,8544 postsFloki Marvin $PALS | Channel
@FlokiMarvinAnnouncements · 562 postsUniverse Bet Announcement
@UniverseBetAnnouncement · 62 postsDigipad Announcement
@DigipadAnnouncement · 3281 postThunders Marketing (Web3)🌛
@thundersmarketing · 7561 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptogems555 · 23,504
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
@bagcalls · 56,635
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
@maythouscalls · 35,084
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@dogendojo · 27,113
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@ShillSeals · 18,659
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 October 2026
@LionCALL · 67,860
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@Maestrosdegen · 35,456
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
@venomcalls · 34,692
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@erics_calls · 30,755
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
@bruiserscalls · 30,311
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@lowtaxbsc · 40,445
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@lowtaxsolana · 38,563
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,888
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
@Caesars_Calls · 38,088
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
@lowtaxethx · 16,416
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026
@gogetagambles · 17,897
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 September 2026
@ethsafesniper · 26,216
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
@MineGems · 20,861
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@EZMoneyCalls · 22,872
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@DegenSeals · 34,123
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@batman_gem · 18,875
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
@gogetacalls · 61,941
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Don's Calls” (@TheDonsCalls), 12,350 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheDonsCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.