🔅$QENIS +1 call at $143K mc : ├KOL: Maniac Degen Apes | CPW: 478/1000 ├♻️Stats AUojwMGu6eagD1U1pR7YbXoLQJ2Fhz1ZT5d7Tcr5pump 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here

Channel
Call Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,432subscribers
-95 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002050218130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CallAnalyserSol |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CallAnalyserSol |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 25,432 | -16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 25,448 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 25,459 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 25,473 | -27 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:40 | 25,500 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 25,504 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 25,527 | first reading |
Engagement
309 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.142%
- avg views ÷ 25,432 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 36.2
- 309 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.775%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 309
- of 309 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 309 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 309 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,193 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 309 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 309 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔅$Rowdy +1 call at $27K mc : ├KOL: SpiderCrypto Trading Journal | CPW: 643/1000 ├♻️Stats 5ucDaCB9ReT4Ei6vWsBXuJUhppLYNfq7mfkG1gaYpump 🎯Score: 60/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$scoobert +1 call at $25K mc : ├KOL: Whale Coin Talk Gambles | CPW: 493/1000 ├♻️Stats 9aQusxmzLtj3wK7PvNvvUPdpSQh8GQBkXM1D58aupump 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$SPERP +1 call at $9K mc : ├KOL: Luigi’s SOL, ETH & BSC Alpha Calls | CPW: 294/1000 ├♻️Stats 6V4rTJ9M4ZNUjvRMvBPiGia5Ju3TutG2nNatRdq1pump 🎯Score: 31/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$AFP +1 call at $91K mc : ├KOL: SpiderCrypto Trading Journal | CPW: 643/1000 ├♻️Stats BhCZdxBF8NUjqA6Weqr4B8W7txvzEZ8cip448axXpump 🎯Score: 60/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$NTDA +1 call at $4M mc : ├KOL: Whale Coin Talk Gambles | CPW: 493/1000 ├♻️Stats qgiXEYJD6mXjHqzJJksX1yjYtownjLXFHAtD7KApump 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$CALLOOOR +1 call at $63K mc : ├KOL: frontrun or zero | CPW: 489/1000 ├♻️Stats A48KeWUuiDSdRQBqAFssgyYATDuBv7cer54V2JSDpump 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$App +1 call at $196K mc : ├KOL: Gubbins Calls | CPW: 480/1000 ├Total calls: 2 ♻️Stats 49nkLrXi8nCZBVKsShDNasEtPe4Vn1mx9Xbr3kTa8pTL 🎯Score: 33/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$App +1 call at $104K mc : ├KOL: 🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews) | CPW: 524/1000 ├♻️Stats 49nkLrXi8nCZBVKsShDNasEtPe4Vn1mx9Xbr3kTa8pTL 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$MCX +1 call at $13M mc : ├KOL: Whale Coin Talk Gambles | CPW: 493/1000 ├♻️Stats 7kt5AcFCL7xj2g23ZjmjenCPjj6VhjpgZXD2bHg5pump 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$OGGIE +1 call at $50K mc : ├KOL: SpiderCrypto Trading Journal | CPW: 643/1000 ├Total calls: 2 ♻️Stats J7ePNotqozFqwxWXmsHezWyQUnHBnqtriRgrX76fpump 🎯Score: 60/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$TITS +1 call at $40K mc : ├KOL: Whale Coin Talk Gambles | CPW: 493/1000 ├♻️Stats 94K33EKxb1v6MnogrKe6KuHEfM6HRJ15zLjkcW2Vpump 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
Showing the 12 most recent of 309 posts we hold for @CallAnalyserSol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 512,966 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@CallAnalyser · 49,446289 postsCall Analyser Announcement
@CallAnalyserPortal · 7,518289 postsTrojan on Solana
@solana_trojanbot · 45,040289 postsKOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 14,637289 postsWhale Coin Talk Gambles
@WCTCalls · 5,226100 postsLuigi’s SOL, ETH & BSC Alpha Calls
@luigiscalls · 8,21010 postsCulture Calls
@culturecalls · 4,7819 postsGubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 24,1799 postsManiac Degen Apes
@maniacapes · 10,8359 postsDon Trades & Apes ⚡️
@DonCallz · 5628 postsMadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 81,0198 postsSpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,9238 postspapi prayground
@papicall · 1,4747 postsDegen Seals
@DegenSeals · 33,7986 postsLiam's gems calls
@LiamsGemCalls · 22,4906 posts🧳💰Nom’s Trade Journal💰🧳
@nomsgems · 4,9886 postsUnc Coco Journal
@crypt0coc0 · 6,2975 postsMrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 38,1835 postsPow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 113,4885 posts666 🔥 Calls
@x666calls · 17,6675 postsDream Calls 100x
@DreamCalls100x · 10,7254 posts🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews)
@LionCALL · 93,3204 postsPRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 21,7854 postsDetecter Bros
@detecter_calls · 12,8853 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 193,571
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@trendingssol · 144,979
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@MaestroBotsHub · 172,101
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Call Analyser (SOL Only)” (@CallAnalyserSol), 25,432 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CallAnalyserSol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.