Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Марина с переменным успехом

Channel

Марина с переменным успехом

@peremennyuspeh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,778subscribers

+197 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001859625159
TypeChannel
Username@peremennyuspeh
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/peremennyuspeh

Growth

12,51613,46112,988.56 August 2026 — 12,581 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,575 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,567 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,556 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,550 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,538 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,527 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,516 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,518 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,461 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,778 subscribers12,7786 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,374–13,603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:5712,778-683
15 Aug 2026, 06:4813,461+943
14 Aug 2026, 01:0512,518+2
12 Aug 2026, 20:4412,516-11
11 Aug 2026, 18:3712,527-11
10 Aug 2026, 19:1112,538-12
9 Aug 2026, 20:5212,550-6
8 Aug 2026, 20:3512,556-11
7 Aug 2026, 21:4812,567-8
7 Aug 2026, 00:3212,575-6
6 Aug 2026, 15:5012,581first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.44%
avg views ÷ 12,778 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total20,498
Reactions total326
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥17453.4%
🔥9027.6%
👍4212.9%
💯133.99%
🤔30.92%
🤯30.92%
👀10.307%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @peremennyuspeh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,220
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,080
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqVJCAGJYkuDWXbmyb1DvXJu1JtCVzCrc1tYQW14 August 20264 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC386 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

5 книг, чтобы отвлечься от происходящего вокруг Что почитать, когда читать новости максимально не хочется? Держите подборку книг по неожиданным темам – не про бизнес или саморазвитие. А так чтобы хоба – и погрузиться максимально новую тему. 1. История уязвимости – Сюзен Уайс Бауэр Затягивающая новая книга про историю заболеваний человечества и борьбы с ними. Легко написана, вчитываешься сразу же. И на фоне истори

🔥3❤‍🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC494 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Где этим летом знакомиться с классными предпринимателями? Не знаю, как вы, а я планирую до конца лета расширить записную книжку, потому что 27 августа иду на конференцию ТОК от Точка Банк. У них и раньше был сильный нетворк, а в этом году обещают его еще и в новом формате: тематические встречи, разборы инсайтов после выступлений, мастермайнд по продажам. Ну и главное - не заболтаться, чтобы не пропустить лекции,

❤‍🔥2

13 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC665 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Иду к 50к в инсте через рилсы. Часть 2 В июне я занялась ростом блога в инсте и съемкой рилс. Рассказываю, как дела. Первая часть тут. За полтора месяца: ⚪️Я выложила 19 рилс ⚪️Блог вырос на 466 подписчиков. Это уже с учетом отписок: подписались около 1000 человек, но у меня сильный отток старой аудитории – блог уже лет 8 активно веду, но ростом занималась давно. ⚪️Рилсы начали залетать: на 110к, на 50к, на 30к,

❤‍🔥8🔥4👍1

12 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC781 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Куда уходить селлерам ВБ и Озон? 3 кейса, как мы делали выручку интернет-магазинам В 2026 году е-коммерс снова возвращается на собственные интернет-магазины. Комментировать положение маркетплейсов не буду, и так всё понятно. Селлерам – поддержки максимальной! И расскажу про опыт моего агентства, как мы делаем продажи для е-кома. С задачами «слезть с иглы маркетплейсов» клиенты приходили и раньше, вот 3 кейса-подтве

👍4🔥2❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC819 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Как продвигать телеграм-канал в 2026-2027 году и нужно ли это делать? Самый популярный вопрос на консультациях. Где подписчиков брать? Разбираю подробно, как будто вы мне за это заплатили. ✔️ Нужно ли продвигать и вести телеграм сейчас? Да. Потому что телеграм заблокировали, но поведение аудитории не изменилось. Ваши потенциальные клиенты по-прежнему тут. И другой площадки, заменяющей телеграм, вообще-то нет. Те

❤‍🔥9🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC859 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ВК блогеры богатеют, Ютуберы беднеют Ассоциация Блогеров и Агентств и агентство DIDENOK TEAM посчитали итоги первого полугодия 2026 на рынке инфлюенс-маркетинга. Результат вас не шокирует, но любопытно увидеть его в конкретных цифрах. 1. Рынок инфлюенс-маркетинга впервые перестал расти 2. Бюджеты перераспределяются в VK, Дзен, Rutube и Max ⚪️Бюджеты в Instagram упали в ноль. ⚪️YouTube и Телеграм тоже драматичес

❤‍🔥3🔥2👍1

9 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC904 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Скидка 65% на большой курс по маркетингу закончится через 8 часов! Если хотите научиться системно привлекать клиентов, делать маркетинговую стратегию, разбираться в актуальных каналах трафика и строить карьеру маркетолога и расти в ней до управленческих позиций — скорее забирайте курс со скидкой 65% Посмотреть подробно программу, отзывы, условия — в закрытом канале Кто успел тот и съел

❤‍🔥3🔥1🤔1🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,080 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Клиент пришёл к нам вести Threads. Через два месяца отдал ещё две соцсети К нам пришёл Biomed – бренд средств для гигиены полости рта. На старте дали Threads. Это честно была маленькая задача – поддержать на небольшом бюджете доп площадку. Мы стартовали в 2023, когда Тредс только запустился и не был так популярен. Сейчас напишу слово, которое у некоторых спецов возможно вызовет закатывание глаз – ПРОАКТИВНОСТЬ. Она

👍19❤‍🔥5🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,090 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Итоги июля – что сейчас делаю Честно говоря, краткий пересказ июня выглядит так: качнулась – посидела за компьютером – погуляла час в парке – поспала. Поговорим про работу, короче. Агентство Говорила, что нашли 2 сегмента с деньгами. Одним из них были селлеры… Хочу провести эксперимент: если в моем контенте и личном бренде делать фокус на агентство, что будет с лидгеном? Поделюсь, как оно. Начинаю записывать рилсы

❤‍🔥15🔥6💯1

5 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈1,100 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Аккуратно вам намекну прямым текстом: распродажа курса по системному маркетингу началась в закрытом канале. И завтра цена немного вырастет – там все подробности в посте. Вам надо, если: ⚪️Вы маркетолог и хотите вырасти в синиора или руководителя. Мы еще и вакансии присылаем и рекомендуем студентов! 😊 ⚪️Вы предприниматель и хотите приводить клиентов в бизнес, а не сливать бюджет. ⚪️Вы работаете на себя и хотите пр

❤‍🔥4👍4

5 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,040 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026

С вами это тоже неприменно случится на съемках Бинго записи видео-контента: 1. Отвалится микрофон и звук не запишется 2. Разрядится телефон / камера, на которую снимают 3. Разрядится свет 4. Закончится память на телефоне 5. Потеряется файл со снятым материалом 6. Шум именно в день съемки Кто снимает контент – добавьте в комментариях, что у вас еще шло не так?

❤‍🔥8🔥5

4 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,220 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Advertisementerid CQH36pWzJqVJCAGJYkuDWXbmyb1DvXJu1JtCVzCrc1tYQW

А вы уже автоматизировали бизнес через ИИ? Вот например коллеги по рекламному рынку, команда Kumar&Solo снизили цену создания рекламного баннера с $25 долларов до 10 центов. Если сейчас опять почувствовали вину, что надо бы разобраться со всеми нейросетевыми приколами и понять из каких сервисов и процессов складывается такая разница – несу вам анонс. Это бесплатная конфа про реальную работу с AI для предпринимателе

🔥7❤‍🔥4💯3👀1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @peremennyuspeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 232,758 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Марина с переменным успехом” (@peremennyuspeh), 12,778 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peremennyuspeh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.