Channel
@popsmarketing
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
113,105subscribers
-419 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001396638697 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @popsmarketing |
| Created | 24 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/popsmarketing |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 113,105 | -48 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:29 | 113,153 | -54 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 113,207 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 113,215 | -45 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 113,260 | -72 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 113,332 | -63 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 113,395 | -49 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 113,444 | -66 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:21 | 113,510 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 113,524 | first reading |
89 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 89 (3 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 306,342 |
| Reactions total | 4,483 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,614 reactions across 73 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,221 | 33.8% | |
| 😁 | 1,031 | 28.5% | |
| 🔥 | 361 | 9.99% | |
| 🗿 | 347 | 9.60% | |
| 😢 | 196 | 5.42% | |
| 👍 | 145 | 4.01% | |
| 🤬 | 104 | 2.88% | |
| 🤯 | 95 | 2.63% | |
| 👏 | 62 | 1.72% | |
| 🥰 | 52 | 1.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,483reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Борьба с вредными привычками сотрудников выходит на новый уровень: девушка рассказала, как её коллеги начали прятать её курилку в самых высоких закромах офиса. Корпоративная жизнь — это сплошной ситком 😂
❤3
Два 17-летних школьника сделали финансовый дайджест, который теперь читают акулы с Уолл-стрит. Парни создали проект Passing the Torch, в котором они простым языком объясняют новости рынка и экономики. Их целевой аудиторией должны были быть такие же зумеры, но проект неожиданно обрёл популярность среди взрослых из крупнейших финансовых компаний — сейчас у рассылки почти 60 тысяч подписчиков, а 77% аудитории использую…
❤21🔥4
Вслед за балетками, низкой посадкой машин и старыми фотоаппаратами Y2K вернул в моду сюжеты музыкальных клипов. Недавно по Москве гуляли парень и девушка с огромными половинками сердца. Миллениалы наверняка сразу вспомнили Another Chance, а теперь стало понятно, зачем этот флешбэк вообще появился. В новом ролике Авито герои наконец встречаются, две части сердца соединяются, а вместе с ними складывается еще одна пар…
❤7🗿4👏1🔥1🥰1
Миллениалы, срочно сюда! В Москве заметили парня с девушкой, которые ходят с половинками сердца — выглядит все ностальгически знакомо. Будто попал в тот самый культовый клип Another Chance, только теперь любовь ищут оба. Пожалуйста, пусть хотя бы эта история закончится хорошо 💛
❤8
Клерки начали активно прогревать зумеров на возвращение в офис: девушка надавила на главное — в опенспейсе можно громко ныть и хвастаться пред коллегами своими новыми модными луками😏
😁7🗿3❤1
Все, кто начинал с первого принципа, постепенно приходят ко второму 🧠
😁27
Конспирологи, все сюда: люди перестали слышать биение сердца — в сети юзеры начали строить новую теорию заговора. Всё началось с вирусных роликов, в которых пользователи предлагали положить руку на грудь и почувствовать стук. Тема быстро закрутилась, так что все начали не просто пытаться нащупать пульс, но и вспомнить, когда последний раз его отчетливо ощущали. В итоге родилась теория, что мы якобы разучились чувст…
🗿21😁10🤯3
VK Видео взялись за развитие региональных блогеров: в Екатеринбурге прошел бранч для авторов. Эксперты платформы и популярные блогеры поделились секретами, как расти и не снимать в пустоту: среди спикеров засветились Артемий Лебедев, Вася Вписка, Макс Брандт и Наташа Гасанханова. Из практических советов: Лебедев рекомендует не зацикливаться на идеальной картинке: «Самое главное — это не картинка, это голос и звук. …
❤5😁4🗿3👍2🔥2🤬1
Наблюдение — главное хобби 2026: к бердвотчингу добавилось изучение природы и растений, которые можно встретить в ближайшем парке. Самое главное — что поначалу всё абсолютно бесплатно 🧠
❤9
Резюме превращаются в рассказы на тему «как я люблю нейронки»: соискателям приходится переписывать свои CV, чтобы выглядеть достаточно ИИ-френдли на рынке треда. Без упоминаний искусственного интеллекта эйчары даже не будут рассматривать кандидата, а его профиль на LinkedIn просто быстро скипнут. Поэтому юзеры задним числом переписывают названия своих должностей и опты работы, чтобы он выглядел более ИИ-ориентирован…
❤16🗿6
Энергетики Monster ценят магию утра и искусство 😂
❤51
Бухгалтеров никогда нельзя просить работать без наушников, на их мантрах держится весь бюджет 🧘
😁26🔥4❤3🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @popsmarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 9,431 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Попсовый маркетинг” (@popsmarketing), 113,105 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/popsmarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.