3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 920–921 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 09:05
920
-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:00
921
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:54
921
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 920 subscribers
Avg views / post
122
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
9 (2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,102
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🫡
5
50.0%
❤
3
30.0%
🔥
1
10.0%
😱
1
10.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다.
정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다.
저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다.
결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다.
혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다.
제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다
@netdebtzer0 로 연…
제가 삼프로 티비에 출연하게 되었습니다. 항상 구독자의 입장이었다가 이렇게 직접 출연하게 되니 감회가 매우 새롭네요.
구독자 300만의 채널에서 무엇을 이야기를 해야 업계에 조금이나마 도움이 될 수 있을까 고민하다가 "과세"이야기를 좀 해봤습니다.
그냥 단순히 "과세 유예해주세요."라는 이야기를 하려는 것이 아니라, 리서치 회사의 대표로써 왜 현재 크립토 과세가 시장의 왜곡을 일으킬 수 있는지, 그리고 이게 왜 더 많은 정부 개입과 규제를 야기할 수 있는지를 이야기 해봤습니다.
1. 현재 정부의 정책 기조와 과세 체계는 서로 상충됩니다. 정부는 법인의 거래소 계좌를 점진적으로 허용하겠다는 방향을 제시하고 있습니다. 이는 분명 업계에는 긍정적인 변화입니다. 저희처럼 벨리데이터를 운영하며 업무 특성상 가상자산을 지속적으로 취득하는 회사들은,…
그리고 J씨랑 좀 친했던 사람이 "굿XX"로 기억을 하는데,
https://www.ilyo.co.kr/?ac=article_view&entry_id=327214
아마 예전에 페이스북에서 세차업체로 유명했던 사람이었던거 같음
너무 오래전 일이라 기억이 안나는데,
예전에 코인으로 돈 좀 벌었다고 꺼드럭댔는데, 그게 번게 사실인지 아닌지도 모르겠고
어느날 사람이 아예 증발해버렸음
이 사람이 죽었는지, 살았는지 아직도 알 수가 없다는게..
이거 썰 보다보니까 생각난건데
2018년에 비트x닉이라고
거래소가 하나 있었음
자기가 주포라고 우기던 대형증권사 출신 J씨가 있었는데
약간 허언증? 말할때 좀 포장하는 허세끼가 있는 사람이었음
근데 2~3번 만났었는데 뭔가 이 사람이 허세끼 있게 한 말들이 전혀 지켜지지 않는거임
예를 들어서 이번에 어디 작은 꼬마빌딩을 사려고했다 근데 무슨 짜치는 변명을 대면서 사실은 안산다고 했다가
1년뒤에 무슨 마닐라 카지노에서도 사기를 치고 다니다가 박제를 당한거임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
저거말고도 뭐 도박판에서 돈떼먹고 튀고 박제당한게 더 있다고 들었는데, 그거까지 찾아볼수가 없음..
진짜 이렇게까지 갈때까지 간사람은 나는 처음봤음. 지금은 뭐하고 지내는지는 모르겠으나 부고연락 안온거보니 살아는 있는거같은데
여기 혹시 보고있나? 보고 있으면 돈달라고 안할테니 미안하다고 연락이라도 해라 ㅡㅡ
남은 5개월, 하반기가 쉽지 않을 것 같음. 과대 낙폭에 따른 반등을 제외하고 조금 더 시계열을 넓히면 다른 관점들이 나올 수 있는 시기
- FCF 적자 전환으로 AI Capex 자본 조달 의구심이 항상 시장을 따라다님
- US 10Y, US 30Y가 너무 높은 곳에 위치하고 있음. 이게 회사채 발행 금리에 영향
- 4월이면 끝날 것 같던 이란 전쟁이 아직도 끝나지 않고 있음. 심지어 트럼프가 끝내길 원해도 못 끝내는 시점 같음
- JPY 순투기 포지션이 24년 8월을 넘어섰음. 내려오면 JPY 약세에 롱을 치면 돈을 벌고 있다는 이야기. JPY proxy인 KRW도 비슷한 포지션이었음. KRW 약세에 롱치면 수익
- 만약 이 포지션이 언와인딩 되기 시작하면 값싼 엔화를 빌려다 해외자산을 매입한 여러 일본 생보사들은 엔화 강세, …
🫡5
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @gogangnam40. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 995,484 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“마리안느의 40살 강남가기” (@gogangnam40), 920 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gogangnam40.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
