#JASMY Short Signal Hit 1st,2nd,3rd Targets✅️✅✅ It's upto 50% profit with 5x Leverage and 100% Profit in 10x leverage. #Wallstreet #Crypto

Channel
Wall Street Crypto Trading
@Wallstreetcryptotrader
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
102,236subscribers
-1,189 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001275581291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Wallstreetcryptotrader |
| Description | We are US based Veteran Crypto/Forex traders. Become a part of the strongest community. Do your own research always. For promotion enquiry @Btcscalper Trade at your own risk we are not responsible for any further loss. We don't have any VIP channel |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Wallstreetcryptotrader |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 102,236 | -158 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 102,394 | -151 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 102,545 | -107 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 102,652 | -123 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 102,775 | -137 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 102,912 | -140 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 103,052 | -123 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 103,175 | -127 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 103,302 | -123 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 103,425 | first reading |
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.5%
- avg views ÷ 102,236 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14,800
- 31 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.25%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 31
- of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (18 July 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 458,731 |
| Reactions total | 14,915 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,560
- Videos
- ≈49
- Links
- ≈732
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
14,915 reactions across 30 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 5,091 | 34.1% | |
| ❤ | 5,030 | 33.7% | |
| 👍 | 4,793 | 32.1% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.007% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,915reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Public company Strive CEO hints at buying more Bitcoin 👀 “The mission is simple: take this thing to the moon. 🚀
🔥228❤120👍95
Considering longing some #AAVE here for the short term. Looking bullish after the breakout. It can show some bullish movement in the short term. Entry: Around $86.90 - $85.50 Targets: $89, $91, $93, $95, $98 Stop-loss: $84.50 Leverage: 5x-10x Do manage your risk well, as the market is uncertain these days.
🔥228❤158👍148
#BICO Short Signal Hit 2nd and 3rs Target ✅✅️ It's upto 300% profit with 20x Leverage and 150% Profit in 10x leverage. #Wallstreet #Crypto
❤234🔥189👍131
#BICO Short Signal Hit 1st Target✅️ It's upto 100% profit with 20x Leverage and 50% Profit in 10x leverage. #Wallstreet #Crypto
👍233🔥134❤123
Consider Shorting some #BICO here For Short term. Looking Bearish here. Can show some Bearish move in Short term. Entry: 0.05985$ Targets: 0.05685$, 0.05382$, 0.05083$, 0.04787$, 0.04181$, Stoploss: 0.06663$ Leverage: 10x-20x Do manage your risk well as market is uncertain this days.
👍195❤172🔥88
#ZRO Long Signal Hit All Targets ✅️✅✅✅✅ It's upto 80% profit with 5x Leverage and 160% Profit in 10x leverage. #Wallstreet #Crypto
🔥196❤180👍159
$BTC upside implied volatility has hit a record low of 23%, suggesting traders are no longer paying for $BTC upside, per Glassnode.
❤177🔥155👍130
Considering Shorting some #JASMY here for the short term. Looking bearish after the breakdown. It can show some Bearish movement in the short term. Entry: Around $0.004165 - $0.004250 Targets: $0.004060, $0.003960, $0.003880, $0.003780, $0.003600, $0.003400 Stop-loss: $0.004350 Leverage: 5x-10x Do manage your risk well, as the market is uncertain these days.
🔥236❤224👍95
According to Glassnode, Bitcoin active addresses surged to 980,000 per day, the highest level since December 2024, following the Coldcard firmware exploit.
👍222❤150🔥136
Considering longing some #1000CAT here for the short term. Looking bullish after the breakout. It can show some bullish movement in the short term. Entry: Around $0.001480 - $0.001460 Targets: $0.001510, $0.001540, $0.001580, $0.001620, $0.001800 Stop-loss: $0.001440 Leverage: 5x-10x Do manage your risk well, as the market is uncertain these days.
👍198❤176🔥154
#BTC Long Signal Hit 2nd Target✅️✅ It's upto 35% profit with 5x Leverage and 70% Profit in 10x leverage. #Wallstreet #Crypto
🔥235👍170❤93
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @Wallstreetcryptotrader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,152,403 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Whalesguide · 201,484#1
@thebull_crypto · 178,571#2
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 326,775#3
@kimoncrypto · 38,373#4
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 340,461#5
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 26,333#6
@thecryptoexpress · 268,697#7
@binance_announcements · 3,627,958#8
@WatcherGuru · 626,839#9
@wiseadvicebysumit · 175,430#10
@BCUSAReal · 142,384#11
@unfolded · 118,779#12
@TCGFORYOU · 76,826#13
@whalescryptovip · 213,223#14
@next10xgem1 · 339,365#15
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 185,378#16
@cccio · 34,479#17
@rose · 85,963#18
@RosePremiumm · 149,111#19
@CryptoHeroTA · 3,675#20
@BinanceWaves · 21,682#21
@CryptoEmpire_Signal · 28,031#22
@cointelegraph · 341,276#23
@cryptobullet · 68,382#24
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 200,260#25
@CryptoCapoTG · 117,198#26
@Forex_Tradings · 19,996#27
@PAIDROSE · 146,174#28
@tradingsignalExperts · 794#29
@ggshot · 91,945#30
@icodrops · 43,374#31
@CryptoNotesbaba · 13,446#32
@binancekillers · 311,855#33
@cryptoamanclub · 107,160#34
@cryptosignals · 19,654#35
@Coin_Signals · 74,253#36
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 94,743#37
@cryptoquant_official · 55,587#38
@torsinu · 2,403#39
@freevipsignal · 3,591#40
@RoseVipSignal · 18,707#41
@crypto_news · 26,371#42
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 105,603#43
@FedRussianInsiders · 126,291#44
@VikingsAnalyst · 38,394#45
@White_Bullss · 52,079#46
@hot_free_crypto_signals · 1,685#47
@trade_bulls · 5,069#48
@CryptoCove · 29,231#49
@Crypto_Busy · 3,724#50
@signalpalace · 3,959#51
@WhaleBotRektd · 22,858#52
@cointrendz · 21,634#53
@Crypto_Swings · 10,991#54
@Cryptoz_Trader · 9,148#55
@BusinessTradingSignals · 2,342#56
@PremiumWhales · 866#57
@KingCryptoCalls · 320,993#58
@marginwhales · 11,256#59
@NitroExperts1 · 4,094#60
@BullMarketMarker · 24,383#61
@CryptoBlockchain_Signal · 2,892#62
@ytcryptovel · 10,772#63
@WhaleSniper · 60,908#64
@CryptoKlondike · 60,467#65
@whale_alert_io · 304,257#66
@BackcomGlobal · 26,096#67
@open4profit · 82,153#68
@cryptoquant_alert · 71,839#69
@whalebotalerts · 146,312#70
@BinanceLiquidations · 183,227#71
@JackDorseyCoins · 22,516#72
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 51,870#73
@OfficiaLCryptoindia · 59,200#74
@CryptoRichard · 13,603#75
@WallMonitor · 7,332#76
@RoseSignalsPremium · 98,332#77
@cmcal_bot · 31,038#78
@coach · 23,619#79
@big_daddy_signals · 2,344#80
@EarnWithSapna · 49,766#81
@rosecrypto · 16,036#82
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 101,628#83
@gorilla_crypto · 177,007#84
@cryptodiffer · 23,954#85
@EmperorbtcTA · 92,207#86
@bitcoinexpertindia · 39,280#87
@cryptotrader · 13,327#88
@TheHulkCryptoChannel · 11,368#89
@cointrendz_whalehunter · 24,469#90
@CryptoScanner100eyes · 31,823#91
@BitcoinSniper · 13,712#92
@Bitmex_Coach · 1,982#93
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,111#94
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Whalesguide · 201,484
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@thebull_crypto · 178,571
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wall Street Crypto Trading” (@Wallstreetcryptotrader), 102,236 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wallstreetcryptotrader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.