Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jack Dorsey Coins 🚀

Channel

Jack Dorsey Coins 🚀

@JackDorseyCoins

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,484subscribers

-134 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001386020896
TypeChannel
Username@JackDorseyCoins
DescriptionJack Macro thoughts about Crypto by OG whale. Not a Financial Advice.
Created8 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JackDorseyCoins

Growth

22,48422,61822,5516 August 2026 — 22,618 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,617 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,607 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,592 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,583 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,567 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,561 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,553 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,544 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,531 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,516 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,498 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,484 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,464–22,638 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 17:2522,484-14
17 Aug 2026, 20:2522,498-18
16 Aug 2026, 22:3422,516-15
15 Aug 2026, 19:3822,531-13
14 Aug 2026, 08:2522,544-9
12 Aug 2026, 22:4422,553-8
11 Aug 2026, 23:5522,561-6
11 Aug 2026, 02:1122,567-16
10 Aug 2026, 01:4122,583-9
9 Aug 2026, 05:0122,592-15
8 Aug 2026, 06:0222,607-10
7 Aug 2026, 05:0122,617-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:1522,618first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 16 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.91%
avg views ÷ 22,484 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.162%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held24 (16 April 20261 August 2026)
Views total6,010
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,400
Videos
39
Links
1,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳3648.6%
🍌3243.2%
🫡68.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Saylor dumping $5B? ​If the final boss of diamond hands is genuinely getting forced to sell at a loss... could this be the ultimate capitulation? @cryptosignals

29 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈1,800 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Favoring #ETH over #BTC. Cleaner structure. 🪙 @cryptosignals

🍌2

14 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC≈4,010 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#ETH It is showing massive relative strength against BTC right now. Immediate targets are $1890 - $1950, with the ultimate peak sitting right around $2000. Invalidation is a hard cut at $1750. The structure is super clean and the execution is simple. Don't overthink it, just let it play out. @cryptosignals

4 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC≈4,500 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026

TRUMP: JUST SIGNED PARDONS FOR SIX PEOPLE SBF one of them?

🐳9

4 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC≈3,620 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @Pumps

CZ couldn’t liquidate Saylor, because Saylor posted they will sell bitcoins to buy back MSTR stocks. CZ had a problem now, if he continues to sell he will liquidate binance, therefore he decided to start buying whatever Saylor is selling. BTC is going to pump to 77k now. @Pumps

🍌6

28 May 2026, 11:23 UTC≈6,010 views13 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarketPhoto

Bitcoin is back in buy zone around 70k @Market

🍌10🫡3

20 May 2026, 18:57 UTC≈3,710 views5 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

#BTC Moving Exactly As Planned: ​Price is pushing higher toward the $78k liquidity ceiling in anticipation of Nvidia earnings. ​However, the Market still needs fuel. Expect a sweep of the naked equal lows and the massive liquidity cluster resting around $75.8k before the true structural expansion triggers. However HTF view is bullish

🍌5

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @JackDorseyCoins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 244,573 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Waves 🌊
@wavesnews · 1,135,419
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 200,898
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 178,190
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Wall Street Crypto Trading
@Wallstreetcryptotrader · 101,837
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 325,904
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Rose 🌹
@rose · 85,886
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
D Man
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 101,491
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jack Dorsey Coins 🚀” (@JackDorseyCoins), 22,484 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JackDorseyCoins.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.