Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Seyed Mohammad Marandi

@s_m_marandi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,399subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001826677318
TypeChannel
Username@s_m_marandi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/s_m_marandi

Growth

21,39921,44621,422.55 August 2026 — 21,446 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,446 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,440 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,431 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,423 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,417 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,418 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,411 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,412 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,399 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,392–21,453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:2521,399-13
13 Aug 2026, 14:3521,412+1
12 Aug 2026, 13:0821,411-7
11 Aug 2026, 13:0521,418+1
10 Aug 2026, 15:2121,417-6
9 Aug 2026, 18:4121,423-8
8 Aug 2026, 20:5821,431-9
6 Aug 2026, 17:3221,440-6
6 Aug 2026, 02:0521,446no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:3021,446first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 21,399 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,210
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held54 (31 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total173,260
Reactions total8,137
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
27
Videos
88
Links
828

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

7,404 reactions across 50 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,39359.3%
👍1,98526.8%
💯2673.61%
🙏2293.09%
👏1942.62%
🔥911.23%
🏆560.756%
👌390.527%
😁330.446%
🥰280.378%
❤‍🔥170.23%
🎉130.176%
🤣130.176%
🍾90.122%
🤔70.095%
40.054%
🫡40.054%
😭30.041%
🥴30.041%
20.027%
9 further kinds140.189%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC≈1,250 views92 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/ec47eRRdDqA?is=VDDRjCgtvQY9b2sU

63👍14🙏8💯6🥰1

14 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈1,340 views86 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/37G42-ISVLk?is=KhSEZzYsYxHmtjrG

47👍20🙏8💯6😭3👏1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,470 views95 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/u3joju6P62Q?is=zAuDUKMTOFDXi7Fw

68👍19💯6👏1🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,810 views109 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtu.be/nvQNaLUddtc?is=PfItIlZ7MWfjD-Qo

69👍24💯11🏆3🙏2

13 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈2,290 views152 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtu.be/BzEoOlv8no4?is=WKBnA76RyBVcFeDX

82👍52🤣12😁3🏆2🙏1

13 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC≈2,340 views130 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/jUyVFQ3mVbU?si=HwM5NF8nN5i0Tkka

81👍34🙏64🥰3🤝2

13 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈3,090 views121 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtu.be/WQSq_jSTvDo?is=qoNY9HZC0XwT-WBH

83👍27🏆4🙏4😍2😁1

13 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈2,310 views117 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/bfqiv3tdTGg?is=KplJZSAL5PHwp1O5

71👍27💯11🏆4🙏2👏1😁1

12 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈2,640 views165 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtu.be/KPmjYrAKi8c?si=cbceKybT-O3SLHLY

👍7965👏12❤‍🔥3🎉3🙏2🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,610 views91 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/nNEfDNbL7TI?si=vTR4X72ceNI3bKWU

60👍16🙏7💯5🕊2🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC≈3,600 views179 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtu.be/PbJZsmtkKOE?si=fH88sEEeynznE-xW

104👍46👏11🏆8🙏4🔥3🥰3

11 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC≈2,710 views135 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/Cks-ie6J-Co?is=I0E90MMl9FkVpPhU

79👍47🔥5🙏3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @s_m_marandi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 400,071 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Seyed Mohammad Marandi” (@s_m_marandi), 21,399 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s_m_marandi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.