International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +2,728. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,949–66,881 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 02:55
66,427
+38
15 Sept 2026, 19:58
66,389
+5
14 Sept 2026, 06:59
66,384
-15
12 Sept 2026, 14:19
66,399
+183
10 Sept 2026, 11:37
66,216
+724
7 Sept 2026, 08:57
65,492
-18
4 Sept 2026, 11:19
65,510
+28
2 Sept 2026, 19:47
65,482
+140
1 Sept 2026, 21:34
65,342
+1,864
31 Aug 2026, 20:06
63,478
+54
30 Aug 2026, 20:07
63,424
+21
29 Aug 2026, 21:37
63,403
-46
28 Aug 2026, 22:07
63,449
-9
27 Aug 2026, 23:25
63,458
-23
26 Aug 2026, 23:15
63,481
-30
25 Aug 2026, 22:34
63,511
-32
24 Aug 2026, 19:56
63,543
-60
23 Aug 2026, 06:58
63,603
-9
21 Aug 2026, 16:22
63,612
-72
20 Aug 2026, 13:05
63,684
first reading
Engagement
1,836 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.59%
avg views ÷ 66,427 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,380
1,046 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,046
of 1,836 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,042 of 1,046 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
1,836 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
2,492,823
Reactions total
50,376
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 02:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈35,400
Videos
≈47,700
Links
≈13,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 26m
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 496 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48,732 reactions across 996 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
8,971
18.4%
❤
6,078
12.5%
💩
5,983
12.3%
🤣
4,039
8.29%
🔥
3,752
7.70%
🤬
3,412
7.00%
👍
2,463
5.05%
😁
2,450
5.03%
👀
2,119
4.35%
🖕
1,761
3.61%
🤮
1,590
3.26%
👏
787
1.61%
💯
484
0.993%
👎
416
0.854%
❤🔥
387
0.794%
🥰
385
0.79%
🎉
379
0.778%
😱
300
0.616%
😭
297
0.609%
🤔
279
0.573%
21 further kinds
2,400
4.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 996 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tabzlive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇺🇸🇬🇧⚡️ — Karoline Leavitt:
We were in the UK, and I sat in on a lunch with President Trump and Keir Starmer, and we're sitting around the table, and we're all enjoying lunch. And President Trump just starts ripping into him for his policies.
Trump said: “Your policies here are so stupid. You need to close your borders. You need to deport these people you have in your country. I know your country. I know your people.…
🇮🇷🇺🇸⚡️ — Although Tehran has seen President Trump’s public rejection of their proposed seven-day plan, Iranian FM Araghchi says no formal response has yet been received through intermediaries.
“We are waiting for concrete positions to be conveyed to us through intermediaries,” Araghchi said, stressing that any progress toward reopening the Strait of Hormuz depends on Washington fulfilling Iran’s conditions.
Araghch…
🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ — U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright:
We had a day this last week where over 20 million barrels of oil, more than pre-conflict levers, flowed out of the straits.
The running average today is almost 13 million barrels a day. So the oil and gas are coming out of the Strait of Hormuz.
The pricing problem today is much more refining capacity than it actually is the flow of oil.
🇺🇸⚡️ — U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright:
We still have higher energy prices than we'd like and nobody's bothered more by that than President Trump.
He is the energy president.
🇺🇸🇨🇳⚡️ — U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright:
The only way to a better America is more energy—energy addition.
Do we want to lead China in AI and get the benefits in drug discovery and reducing health care costs? Absolutely.
But this is going to need tens, maybe hundreds of gigawatts of a new electric generating capacity.
This administration is all in on that.
🇹🇷🇮🇱🇵🇸⚡️ — Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan on Israel:
The oppression and massacres carried out by Israel are no longer going without consequences to the same extent as a result of the diplomatic efforts that have been made.
In other words, Israel now has to pay very heavy costs for every action it takes.
This isolation, including facing legal consequences through institutions such as the International Court of…
🇩🇰🇺🇳⚡️ — Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen:
We need to consider how AI can contribute positively to shape international peace and security and bridge global digital divides.
At the same time, we must remain clear-eyed of the significant risks and start building some strong guardrails so we can manage the global risk in due time.
🇺🇸⚡️ — OpenAI, Anthropic and independent security researchers are investigating tens of thousands of incidents involving frontier AI models behaving in unexpected or potentially dangerous ways, according to Axios.
The incidents, recorded during internal testing and real-world operations, include bypassing safety restrictions, attempting to escape secure environments, creating message boards and trying to evade monit…
🇨🇦🇮🇱🇵🇸🇺🇳⚡️ — Canada's Foreign Minister Anita Anand:
Israel's settlements in the West Bank are illegal under international law and an obstacle to peace.
That is why Canada announced earlier this month that we intend to restrict trade in goods with illegal Israeli settlements.
🇨🇦🇮🇱🇵🇸🇺🇳⚡️ — Canada's Foreign Minister Anita Anand:
Let us be clear: self-determination is a right to which both Israelis and Palestinians are entitled.
Canada firmly believes that lasting peace and security can be achieved only through a negotiated two-state solution. That means a Palestinian state living alongside Israel in peace, security, and dignity.
Israel's right to exist is not up for debate, and the right …
🇨🇦🇮🇷🇺🇳⚡️ — Canada's Foreign Minister Anita Anand:
Canada's position on Iran is unequivocal. Iran is the principal threat to peace and security in its region. It must never acquire a nuclear weapon.
Its threats to navigation rights in the Strait of Hormuz are a direct affront to international law.
Canada is deploying every available tool, including targeted sanctions that I announced this week, to confront the Irani…
🤡58💩19🤮12👏10🖕7❤3😁2💯1
Signed Tabz
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,836 posts we hold for @tabzlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 98 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
The Defender Dome @DefenderDome · 21,482 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
Geopolitics Watch @GeoPWatch · 80,557 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
WarFront Witness @wfwitness · 81,256 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
AMK Mapping @AMK_Mapping · 59,757 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
War Noir @war_noir · 53,385 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Middle East Observer @me_observer_TG · 38,704 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Clash Report @ClashReport · 109,374 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸 @rnintel · 170,796 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela @BellumActaNews · 114,627 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tabz - Live News” (@tabzlive), 66,427 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tabzlive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
