Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

💥 Pulse Z

@explosive_pulse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

924subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001433081163
TypeChannel
Username@explosive_pulse
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/explosive_pulse

Growth

9249269256 Aug 2026, 12:22 — 926 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:03 — 926 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:51 — 924 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 12:227 Aug 2026, 02:51
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 924–926 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:51924-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:03926no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:22926first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.0%
avg views ÷ 924 subscribers
Avg views / post
304
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,958
Reactions total132
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣5843.9%
💯2922.0%
🤬2015.2%
😁118.33%
🔥75.30%
🫡64.55%
😡10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC42 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @EurasianChoicePhoto

Cognitive dissonance. Why jailing the leakers if the missile stockpiles are full lol? @eurasianchoice

🤣7

5 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC119 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

NHS England has issued an apology after admitting that employees from Palantir and other suppliers can access identifiable information related to individual patients via the Federated Data Platform. "And OTHER suppliers"?! Who exactly?? “We recognise that the DPIA contained an error in how it described supplier access to data so we are correcting that error, and we apologise for any confusion this has caused,” the

🤬7

5 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC312 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Yes, the NHS handed identifiable patient data to Palantir, so now Israel and zionist governments will be able to target pro-Palestinians by adjusting their medication with lethal doses or switching off their pacemakers remotely.

💯8🤬1

4 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC117 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

—❗️🇺🇸/🇮🇷 BREAKING: President Trump has presented Iran with an ultimatum; reach a deal to fully open the Strait of Hormuz by Tuesday (today), or face ‘devastating strikes’ – Bloomberg @Middle_East_Spectator

🤣13

4 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC121 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Israel spent $46.5 MILLION to influence ChatGPT, Claude and other AI chatbots — Drop Site Former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale reportedly built a network of pro-Israel websites designed to shape ‘GPT conversations’ @MTodayNews This is exactly why most AI chatbots can't be trusted.

💯8

4 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC114 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @MTodayNewsPhoto

Israel spent $46.5 MILLION to influence ChatGPT, Claude and other AI chatbots — Drop Site Former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale reportedly built a network of pro-Israel websites designed to shape ‘GPT conversations’ @MTodayNews

🔥6

4 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC≈2,540 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Remember Jake Lang? The fake Christian crusader who wears Amazon-bought military cosplay uniform and is actually a wall-kissing zionist? Let's see what he's been up to... Oh.

🤬8

3 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC113 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🇺🇸President Trump: ‘Iran is begging for a deal, we’re talking to them now. But this is their last chance.’ 😅 Save this.

😁7🤣1🤬1

3 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC86 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @middle_east_spectator

— 🇺🇸/🇮🇷 President Trump: ‘Iran is begging for a deal, we’re talking to them now. But this is their last chance.’ @Middle_East_Spectator

🤣8🤬3

3 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC118 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

In the last few days, a bomb went off in a restaurant in Moscow. Now a drone has crashed into a beach, with nothing more than sunbathers and children playing there. Ukraine has gone into total ISIS-terrorist mode. This level of deliberate targeted attacks on civilians is typical of zionism. Russia needs to directly target Kiev leadership. Zelensky has lived long enough. I'd hoped he would have committed suicide by

💯13😡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @explosive_pulse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 292,379 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💥 Pulse Z” (@explosive_pulse), 924 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/explosive_pulse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.