两名以色列官员和消息人士称,以色列当局怀疑迪拜航空事件可能是一起恐怖袭击未遂事件。 一名以色列官员表示,收集到的信息表明,副驾驶试图刺伤机长,有乘客协助制服了副驾驶。副驾驶据称是阿曼公民。 阿曼和以色列没有建交。目前尚不清楚该阿曼籍副驾驶是如何获得飞往以色列的许可的。 以色列交通部长米里·雷杰夫要求民航局调查阿联酋是否违反了与以色列的航空协议。该协议规定,只有持与以色列有外交关系的国家护照的飞行员才可在以色列降落。 飞机在不到两分钟的时间内骤降17400英尺(约5304米)。图片显示,客机尾部的方向舵似乎受损。 以色列国家安全总局(辛贝特)前飞安负责人阿里克·泽尔表示,机体损伤并非外物撞击所致,可能是快速俯冲造成的。 (CNN,以色列时报 1,2,3)

Channel
竹新社
@tnews365
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
164,549subscribers
+8,499 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001353105961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tnews365 |
| Description | 7×24不定时编译国内外媒体的即时新闻报道。 查阅新闻资料,前往竹新资料室: t.me/kt_database 如有任何问题,联系竹新社小编: t.me/ktnews_editor_bot 注:本频道原创新闻按照CC BY 4.0协议发布。 |
| Created | 20 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tnews365 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 164,549 | +282 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 164,267 | +95 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 164,172 | +164 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 164,008 | +619 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 163,389 | +3,937 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 159,452 | +1,827 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 157,625 | +33 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 157,592 | +71 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:33 | 157,521 | +40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 157,481 | +47 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 157,434 | +89 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 157,345 | +74 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 157,271 | +106 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 157,165 | +39 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 157,126 | +63 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 157,063 | +66 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 156,997 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 156,984 | +54 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 156,930 | +39 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 156,891 | first reading |
Engagement
181 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.1%
- avg views ÷ 164,549 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 24,800
- 77 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 77
- of 181 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 181 (31 July 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,910,800 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 09:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,800
- Videos
- ≈848
- Links
- ≈21,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 03s
- Average length
- 1m 21s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
因机上飞行员发生“激烈”争执,导致一架从阿联酋迪拜飞往以色列特拉维夫的客机发出7500遇险代码后改道飞往沙特阿拉伯。 航班跟踪数据显示,该客机最初发出7700遇险代码,不久又改发代表“遭遇劫机或非法干扰”的7500。 事件发生后,以色列总理和国防部长举行了安全磋商,以军战斗机也一度紧急升空。 以色列总理办公室发言人表示,目前不认为这是一起劫机事件。 该客机已降落在沙特阿拉伯。 (CNN,路透社,以色列时报 1,2)
韩国联合参谋本部30日公布立场文件,敦促朝鲜停止“边境加固工程”,并就非军事区发生的地雷爆炸事故道歉。 联参指朝鲜在军事分界线附近埋设地雷公然违反《停战协定》,也与韩朝既有共识相抵触,朝鲜有必要立刻停止相关行为。韩军指出,对于今后发生的任何情况,责任完全在于朝方。 朝鲜劳动党中央委员会部长金与正29日发表题为《挑衅的肇事者必须为自导自演的闹剧付出代价做好思想准备》的谈话。 其在谈话中全面否认韩方爆炸事故调查结论,称事故“显然是韩方自导自演的闹剧”,并表示若“韩国军方流氓”以此为借口向进行“边境加固工程”的朝方军人实弹射击,朝方将会立即实施毫不留情的报复。 21日,韩国陆军第25师麾下前沿部队在韩朝非军事区韩方一侧执行搜索任务时发生地雷爆炸事故,造成3人受伤,其中2名军人重伤。 韩军和联合国军司令部29日在事发地点附近发现一枚朝鲜塑料制褐色反步兵地雷,其形状与朝军木盒地雷相似。但韩军研判当天发现的地雷与木盒地雷不相同。 (韩联社 …
北京理工大学9月29日宣布,解除法学院助理教授裴轶(民盟籍)聘用关系,取消她的教师和研究生指导资格。 她在《数字时代的女性权益保护》课程中问学生“7常委应有几名女性”,以引出介绍美国最高法院大法官金斯伯格生前“有人问最高法有几名女性足够?我说9名,人很震惊,以前9名男性大法官没见人们震惊”名言。 (北京理工大学)
财政部发《关于实施居民购房贷款贴息政策的通知》自10月1日起,向总价150万元以下且面积120平米以下的首套房贷,按照贷款本金(上限为100万元)给予年化1个百分点、期限不超过5年的贴息支持。政策施行1年。资金中央财政承担90%,省及以下承担10%。 (中国财政部)
位于韩国首尔盆唐区的一家名叫“习近平”(시진핑)的中餐厅24日遭人闯入破坏,餐厅招牌被涂漆。 韩国警方称确认的4名嫌疑人均为中国籍,年龄介于20多岁到40多岁之间。4人在案发前一个月持旅游签证赴韩,并在事发当日乘飞机逃回中国,其中3人赴烟台、1人赴上海。警方已针对该4人申请拘留证,并启动国际司法合作机制。 受害餐厅店主29日表示,之所以使用这个店名,是想效仿中国最高领导人习近平,希望借”最高“的寓意在中餐领域成为顶尖。 但由于担心再次受害,且继续使用原名可能会引发争议,店主决定将店名改为普通名称,新招牌将于下周安装。 店主重新购置了受损的椅子和餐具,并计划将疑似被喷洒农药或杀虫剂的食材全部废弃,价值约100万韩元(约合人民币4945元)。 自去年夏天以来,该中餐厅接连接到抗议电话,餐厅招牌也被涂漆。警方也正就两事件是否有关展开调查。 (韩联社 1,2,MBC,NHK)
泽连斯基9月23日在联合国大会上表示,乌方日前将两名朝军俘虏送往韩国。对此,韩国总统李在明指责乌方违反双方此前达成的保密约定,令人遗憾。但乌克兰总统办公室否认双方达成保密约定。 韩国外交部28日召见乌克兰驻韩使馆临时代办,就此表达严重关切,强调乌方虚假通报严重损害两国政府之间的互信,也有损于双边友好关系,并敦促乌克兰政府就此作出澄清并正式道歉。 一些专家认为,泽连斯基可能试图通过披露此事来揭露朝鲜卷入战争的危险,从而吸引西方援助。但韩国政府担心此事可能引发朝鲜的强烈反应,从而阻碍朝韩恢复合作。 此外,泽连斯基28日表示,有超过8千名朝鲜军队驻扎在俄罗斯境内,并且正在准备部署另外1万名士兵。据乌克兰和韩国估计,自2024年以来,朝鲜已向俄罗斯派遣约1.4至1.5万名士兵,其中大部分部署在库尔斯克地区。根据乌克兰和独立机构的评估,朝鲜还向俄罗斯提供了数百万发炮弹以及弹道导弹等武器。 (韩联社,美联社,路透社)
调解方仍继续致力于在伊朗和美国间斡旋,美伊两国官员9月28日分别与调解方会谈。 美国官员称,虽然特朗普口头拒绝了伊朗的提议,但他愿意寻求非军事手段解决美伊冲突。特朗普希望在伊朗核问题取得实质性进展的条件下,解除对伊朗的部分制裁措施。而双方仍在时间安排和行动先后的问题上存在巨大分歧。地区官员表示,美国正寻求伊朗在核问题上做出让步,包括允许核查人员入境。 对于也门胡塞武装与沙特阿拉伯的冲突,伊朗方面认为这是胡塞武装自身诉求,与美伊冲突无关。但伊朗愿意帮助双方达成和解。 (美联社,路透社)
英国5名男子因涉嫌违反《爆炸物法》,9月27日在空军费尔福德基地附近被捕。他们被怀疑策划恐怖袭击。嫌疑人均为来自伦敦的英国公民。 由于费尔福德基地被美国空军用于对伊朗的军事行动。当局正在调查未遂袭击是否与伊朗有关。伊朗已坚决否认与此相关。 5名嫌疑人已于28日下午保释。调查工作仍在进行中。 (Sky)
SpaceX重型运载火箭“星舰”9月28日首次成功进入地球轨道。此次飞行的目标是绕地球飞行六圈,以证明其为NASA的“阿耳忒弥斯”登月计划做好准备。 (美联社)
美国驻华大使庞德伟9月27日上福克斯电视台访问。就对台军售问题,他表示,美国的一个中国政策没有变化,即坚持台湾关系法、三个联合公报和六项保证,不支持独立也不支持胁迫,特朗普已反复向习近平阐明这一立场;在本轮军售之前,特朗普已批准多轮对台军售,比1979年后所有总统都多50%;特朗普和习近平每次会面都会讨论对台军售,他强调美国向世界上其他人都出售武器,甚至一度问习近平你想不想也买点。 美国国务院随后表示,美国法律禁止向中国出售武器,特朗普政府没有作出向北京出售武器的计划或邀约。 (纽约时报)
巴基斯坦开伯尔-普什图省德拉伊斯梅尔汗地区9月26日发生爆炸,造成至少11人死亡、30人受伤。巴基斯坦塔利班宣称对袭击负责。 (路透社)
Showing the 12 most recent of 181 posts we hold for @tnews365. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tnews365 edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 29 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 69 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@lymbo_chatting · 54715 posts东方媒体与科技综合频道
@emtgcorp · 8010 posts卖报社
@MaiTungNews · 6314 posts💙💛 Quantumalgorithm SIGSLEEP Collection 💙💛
@Genius_Lab_Collection · 1343 posts鸥 Billchan 鸥 🍟 大薯 | 去码头整点薯条
@billchenla · 3,1633 posts河伯特高
@HerbertGaoChannel · 4782 posts发言频道
@Speaker_cn · 142 posts👋jun😎士🌲坦🌲ding🏯堡💊
@cshs_edu_pill · 2,9932 posts阡陌之中 向阳生长 🏳️⚧️🇺🇳
@field_sunflower_Aoino · 1452 posts今天高蜀黍吃药了吗
@gaichiyaole · 292 postsGinvera 的中国游戏见闻
@gamelollipop · 3672 posts话里画外
@hualihuawai · 602 postsOKHK 👀
@iokhk · 2,0532 posts天天向上
@kn007_channel · 5732 posts敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 71,1252 posts数字踪迹
@vwebarchive · 402 posts中国航天🇨🇳
@CASC1956 · 541 post每日消费电子观察
@CE_Observe · 75,0361 postCl 杂记
@ClSlaid · 391 postDuffy的朋友圈-海外羊毛&esim开卡聚合分享
@Duffybears · 5921 postEternal_安全内参
@Eternalanquan · 1,8101 post🎗️🏆🔥榮光香港歷史文化真相搶救戰線🔥🏆🎗️
@GlorytoHongKongFreeHongKong · 691 postКанал HafniЯ
@KanalHafnia · 961 postKaren医生の日常
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,3851 postKrebs::OutputStream
@KbsEcho · 971 postLetITFly News
@LetITFlyW · 9,5961 post卖动的摸鱼日常
@MaiTungTM_Notes · 2,6131 post今天abc看了啥🤔
@abcthoughts · 6,9761 postAcunico nichijou
@acunico · 461 post青祢的垃圾堆
@adproqwq · 2521 postAPPDO的互联网记忆
@appdopic · 16,3461 postBai Talk | 百说
@baipinsay · 61 post🦒🌿🤝
@bbacollection · 401 post樱花互联交换中心公告/TG代理发布
@channel_sakura · 2,9271 postTripleY Eats @Hangzhou
@cubicyyy · 2841 post🍀 乔乔的文娱数码避风港 🍀
@culturenlife · 1,8431 postEduBug
@edubug · 41 post🖨️废话制造bot
@feihuazhizaobot · 471 post趣事
@funny_fyj · 51 post河鱼的话
@gibberish0 · 181 post白玉楼前 | 幽明結界
@hakugyokurou · 31 post糊锅
@huguo · 801 postyihong0618 和朋友们的频道
@hyi0618 · 9,4001 postemit Light();
@idawnlightc · 5811 post螺莉莉的黑板报
@im_RORIRI · 3,8381 post墨水瓶
@ink_dyeing · 131 postLinux 穷比快乐屋
@its_safe_house · 2181 postLeslie和朋友们
@justgoidea · 3241 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CN_DH · 6,5907 posts电报搜索记录 | 消息搜索 | 大家都在搜什么
@soso_search · 4364 postsJon's Observation Station
@jonshowing · 443 postsLymbo@碎碎念
@lymbo_chatting · 5473 posts今天abc看了啥🤔
@abcthoughts · 6,9762 postsAPPDO的互联网记忆
@appdopic · 16,3462 posts超级索引🔍
@hao123hub · 1,0312 posts鸥 Billchan 鸥 🍟 大薯 | 去码头整点薯条
@billchenla · 3,1631 post每日消费电子观察
@CE_Observe · 75,0361 post频道推荐
@channelrecommendation · 501 postLoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 72,0641 post真空中的球形猫。
@fermi_cat · 5761 post简中互联网废物大赏
@fucku_idiot · 40,4591 postLeslie和朋友们
@justgoidea · 3241 post卖报社
@MaiTungNews · 6311 post老菊MEAN箴言
@meanmodemedian · 1,5011 post精選新聞
@NWTnews · 901 post平安珞珈山
@PingAnLuoJiaShan · 5111 post发言数据馆
@Speaker_figure_cn · 41 postTG 中文索引频道
@suoyin02 · 2361 post丰县女子关注组
@UnchainFX · 1,1311 post中华民国电报联盟
@unionofchina · 8081 post[资源数据库]
@xinxishujuku · 21 post学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 87,1021 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@xhqcankao · 164,187#1
@zaihuapd · 283,183#2
@CE_Observe · 75,036#3
@DNSPODT · 72,064#4
@solidot · 47,568#5
@vps_xhq · 49,990#6
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,563#7
@kt_database · 9,044#8
@Financial_Express · 36,931#9
@zhihu_bazaar · 22,186#10
@acgdaily · 16,665#11
@personal_hub · 11,556#12
@xhsyp · 31,479#13
@FinanceNewsDaily · 57,803#14
@appdopic · 16,346#15
@NewsFW · 6,809#16
@titan_pain · 20,762#17
@iBreaking · 3,264#18
@wxbyg · 19,469#19
@NewWorldObservationLog · 6,969#20
@douban_read · 35,976#21
@LifeJapan · 7,431#22
@theinitium_rss · 13,033#23
@XueXi_China · 87,102#24
@GodlyNews1 · 69,298#25
@woshadiao · 115,194#26
@landiansub · 45,199#27
@outvivid · 9,060#28
@cnbeta_com · 27,582#29
@jike_collection · 35,824#30
@zhujiwiki_info · 10,674#31
@bupt_moe · 5,110#32
@gledos_microblogging · 6,615#33
@JISFW · 12,770#34
@projectXtls · 29,942#35
@abcthoughts · 6,976#36
@inside1024 · 107,720#37
@AppDoDo · 40,725#38
@jandan_pic · 25,280#39
@gebaopiCloud · 101,252#40
@CN_Privacy · 16,727#41
@pingrangTV · 29,208#42
@liyuans · 14,292#43
@milkice_portal · 3,248#44
@FoolishTraceWind · 16,632#45
@iyouport · 27,814#46
@blindgamer · 10,744#47
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,385#48
@update4weekly · 5,313#49
@bluebird_channel · 7,930#50
@boomtechreviews · 6,007#51
@alansbox · 4,448#52
@Laoself · 3,027#53
@chinesecaixin · 7,263#54
@kejiqu · 36,473#55
@cdtchinesefeed · 44,158#56
@AppleNuts · 37,006#57
@LetITFlyW · 9,596#58
@archlinuxcn · 11,175#59
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MothLib · 34,658
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026
@OutsightChina · 41,383
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
@voachinese · 34,696
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
@zaobaosg · 36,506
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
@pelosi3 · 71,125
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
@times001 · 84,754
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
@XueXi_China · 87,102
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
@zaihuapd · 283,183
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 12 August 2026
@freechinese · 27,572
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@baguabox · 33,372
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 4 September 2026
@fucku_idiot · 40,459
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
@solidot · 47,568
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,725
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
@FinanceNewsDaily · 57,803
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@DNSPODT · 72,064
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
@CE_Observe · 75,036
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 August 2026
@xhqcankao · 164,187
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
@vps_xhq · 49,990
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
@VoiceofPooh · 22,536
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@cyber_confessional · 40,149
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 30 August 2026
@rthk_new_c · 49,497
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,563
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
@JShangrong · 24,735
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
@ruheyushadiaoxiangchu · 28,613
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 101 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“竹新社” (@tnews365), 164,549 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tnews365.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.