Channel
@UnchainFX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,165subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001742456023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UnchainFX |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UnchainFX |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 1,165 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 1,167 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 1,169 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 1,169 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 2 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 48.6% | |
| 🙏 | 21 | 30.0% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 11.4% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 7.14% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2023 to 18 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
原丰县县委书记娄海被控受贿、滥用职权罪，12月18日在淮安市中院被判12年，并处罚金100万元。 法院认定他：2012年5月至撤职前在邳州和丰县任上，为他人工程承揽、居间介绍项目、违章建筑处罚、变更查封保全的财产、提高安置房回购价格提供帮助，受贿1429万元、其中1029万元未实际取得，判10.5年；2016年底至2018年，滥用职权造成国有资产损失1.47亿元，判4年。部分受贿事实是主动交代、办案机关尚未掌握，且赃款已全部追缴，故从轻判决。 2022年2月23日，江苏省委“丰县铁链女”调查组认为他管理救助和计生失职失责，还批准发布信息不实的情况通报，决定将他撤职。之后当局未向社会通报对他审查调查的情况。 （央视新闻）
❤10👍7
包青天就算复活，哭拜他的人也一定不会喜欢 via chinadigitaltimes.net
https://yibaochina.com/?p=252705
❤2
公告：“关注‘铁链女’行动者群体”荣获2024年第十届“曹顺利人权捍卫者纪念奖” 发表： 03月14日13:29:00 查看原文
❤5
https://open.spotify.com/episode/6CyrUZMvuYBoiQojFjLE9j
👍1
https://m.dw.com/zh/何为强奸欧盟统一定义的努力未获成功/a-68207558
羁押三年，中国人权和女权行动者李翘楚获刑3年8个月 via theinitium.com
“铁链女”事件二周年：她真的被遗忘了吗？
😢2🤮1
https://twitter.com/whyyoutouzhele/status/1742506305502298593
有消息称，因驾车前往徐州丰县为铁链女事件发声而两次被徐州警方抓捕的乌衣目前已经慢慢重归生活。 via 李老师不是你老师 / @whyyoutouzhele
❤17🙏9👏1
在不确定性中呐喊 | 2023性别事件盘点
https://www.voachinese.com/a/women-in-chinas-leadership/7411353.html
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @UnchainFX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,010,459 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“丰县女子关注组” (@UnchainFX), 1,165 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnchainFX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.