Channel
@woshadiao
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
115,315subscribers
+314 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001341930464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @woshadiao |
| Created | 2 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/woshadiao |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 115,315 | +54 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 115,261 | +61 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 115,200 | +9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 115,191 | +53 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 115,138 | +40 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 115,098 | +54 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 115,044 | +44 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 115,000 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 115,007 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 115,001 | first reading |
243 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 210 of 243 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 243 (6 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 361,410 |
| Reactions total | 5,944 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,928 reactions across 201 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 972 | 16.4% | |
| 🥰 | 953 | 16.1% | |
| 😁 | 786 | 13.3% | |
| 💩 | 435 | 7.34% | |
| ❤ | 320 | 5.40% | |
| 😭 | 286 | 4.82% | |
| 😡 | 219 | 3.69% | |
| ✍ | 192 | 3.24% | |
| 🤔 | 191 | 3.22% | |
| 🌭 | 176 | 2.97% | |
| 👍 | 133 | 2.24% | |
| 😨 | 130 | 2.19% | |
| 🤯 | 120 | 2.02% | |
| 😢 | 98 | 1.65% | |
| ☃ | 96 | 1.62% | |
| 🤡 | 93 | 1.57% | |
| 🥴 | 90 | 1.52% | |
| 🤪 | 57 | 0.962% | |
| 😇 | 54 | 0.911% | |
| 😱 | 53 | 0.894% | |
| 26 further kinds | 474 | 8.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 210 of the 243 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,944reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 243 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
投稿机器人 Beta 更新： 1. 更新了 bot 底层，便于以后增加更多功能。 2. 引入了实验性的自动检查重复投稿流程，在投稿时可以第一时间知道自己投的内容是否有别人投过一模一样的内容。 3. 引入了实验性的投稿追踪功能，以后有人投💩还被审核通过时可以找到是谁投稿或通过的，便于清算审核。 当前这些功能将会在 @woshadiao_newbot 进行测试，待功能稳定后会进入到主要审核流程。有兴趣的可以使用试试。
🌭10💯1🤔1
Signed 🕓☝️🦌
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9🤣6😁2
Signed 投稿机器人 2.1 公测版
善观人穷者姿
✍18🤣3❤1🤬1
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
Photo, posted without a caption
🤯10❤2
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
⚠️ #NSFW 提前预警
❤1
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
via EZNER
🥰48💩5❤3😁1
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
Photo, posted without a caption
🥴32🐳10🥰6❤1
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
via my nbkls
🥰27✍4❤1🤩1
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
via my nbkls
🤔24😱13👏2❤1
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
via my nbkls
🥰30🤔10❤1
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
via my nbkls
👍19😭9🥰3❤1
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
via my nbkls
😭53✍6❤2🥴1
Signed 投稿机器人 2.0
Showing the 12 most recent of 243 posts we hold for @woshadiao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 17,962 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“每日沙雕墙” (@woshadiao), 115,315 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/woshadiao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.