一名美国官员透露,五角大楼可能很快向波斯湾增派一艘航空母舰,以及1万名海军水兵和海军陆战队员。若美国总统特朗普决定升级对伊朗的打击,此举将为美国中央司令部司令提供更多选项。 https://zb.sg/dSWB
👍3👎1🤣1

Channel
@zaobaosg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
36,506subscribers
-218 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001263050068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zaobaosg |
| Description | 以睿智亲和的内容,与你共谈天下事。 下载《联合早报》App: zaobao.com.sg/products |
| Created | 26 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zaobaosg |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 36,506 | -339 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 36,845 | -10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 36,855 | +23 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 36,832 | +9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 36,823 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 36,828 | -22 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 36,850 | -24 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 36,874 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:03 | 36,867 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:46 | 36,874 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:08 | 36,867 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 36,874 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 36,876 | +13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 36,863 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 36,853 | +17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 36,836 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 36,820 | +6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 36,814 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 36,822 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 36,828 | first reading |
869 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 869 (4 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 976,758 |
| Reactions total | 7,599 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 04:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
16,643 reactions across 848 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 4,278 | 25.7% | |
| 👍 | 2,904 | 17.4% | |
| 👎 | 1,831 | 11.0% | |
| ❤ | 1,684 | 10.1% | |
| 😢 | 1,215 | 7.30% | |
| 🤔 | 1,009 | 6.06% | |
| 😡 | 1,008 | 6.06% | |
| 😱 | 899 | 5.40% | |
| 👏 | 631 | 3.79% | |
| 🙏 | 627 | 3.77% | |
| 🎉 | 397 | 2.39% | |
| 💯 | 76 | 0.457% | |
| 🔥 | 52 | 0.312% | |
| 🆒 | 32 | 0.192% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 868 of the 869 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,038 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 869 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
一名美国官员透露,五角大楼可能很快向波斯湾增派一艘航空母舰,以及1万名海军水兵和海军陆战队员。若美国总统特朗普决定升级对伊朗的打击,此举将为美国中央司令部司令提供更多选项。 https://zb.sg/dSWB
👍3👎1🤣1
印度尼西亚警方已逮捕上个月在爪哇海倾覆的客轮船长。这起事故造成至少78人遇难,57人至今下落不明。 https://zb.sg/8wCc
😡5👍1😢1
随着11月中期选举临近,美国民众的生活负担问题持续发酵。除了飙升的燃油、食品和住房成本外,不断攀升的学生贷款账单正成为数百万美国家庭预算的重大威胁。 https://zb.sg/fBnB
👎3👍1💯1🤔1🤣1😢1
美国总统特朗普说,德黑兰方面很可能是迪拜航空机长遭袭击事件的幕后黑手。他还说,一旦查实,伊朗将遭到“猛烈重击”。 https://zb.sg/M2Xt
🤣9👍6❤1👏1
长堤海鲜餐馆在东海岸公园的原址星期三(9月30日)最后一天营业,经理受访时透露,为了能够留守在东海岸,努力竞标到公园另一处的新址。 https://zb.sg/gvN9
👍7❤3🤣3👏1
在阿联酋迪拜航空客机险些坠毁事故中,印度籍机长被副驾驶刺伤后,仍奋力打开驾驶舱门让众人制伏副机师,成功拯救全机人员,被各方誉为英雄。 https://zb.sg/C6Ls
👏27👍3🤣1🙏1
更多漫画:https://bit.ly/zbcomic
🤣16🤔2👎1
尽管东南亚民众高度关注气候变化带来的影响,并普遍支持绿色能源转型,但受中东冲突引发的能源冲击和高通货膨胀影响,失业和经济衰退已成为区域民众最迫切关注的问题。 https://zb.sg/hkW8
😢10👎1🤣1🙏1
新加坡股市今年以来表现强劲,无论是从股价还是交易量来看都录得增长。海峡时报指数年初至今扬升超过20%,跑赢多个亚太市场。 https://zb.sg/s2Wz
🎉12🤣4😡1
保诚保险前经纪经理不满同行在社交媒体刊登误导性广告,化名向金融管理局“吹哨”举报,自己后来被解约。他因此入禀高庭索赔,败诉后上诉,仍没能改变结局,还得付超过12万元的诉讼费。 https://zb.sg/LhhV
🤣7👎6🤔4😢1
一名女乘客携带大纸箱登上飞机,疑执意将纸箱放在腿上,也不愿将纸箱交由机组人员保管,更拒绝下机,导致机组人员与她沟通约45分钟,最终由警员登机劝离。 https://zb.sg/JoBKc
🤣15😡7❤3🤔2🎉1
美国田纳西州近200年来首次对女性囚犯执行死刑,但这名女子在接受两剂死刑注射后仍存活,随后被送往医院治疗。 https://zb.sg/uRD9
🤣18😱12🤔6❤1👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 869 posts we hold for @zaobaosg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@zaobaosg edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
如果只能选一个,你觉得哪一位“神仙队友”是剧集不可或缺的人物?
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
【早话题】多几天育儿假,会让你更敢生吗?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
【早话题】为新山的消费差价,这400公尺你走不走?
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
【早话题】网购时,你最看重哪个因素?
The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
【早话题】牛车水不挂中秋灯饰,你怎么看?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
【早话题】轻拍孩子惹家长不满,推倒老人又造成受伤,你怎么看双方的做法?
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 869 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Lianhe Zaobao |
|---|---|
| Description | Singapore-based Chinese-language newspaper |
| X / Twitter | @zaobaosg |
| YouTube | UCrbQxu0YkoVWu2dw5b1MzNg |
| Official site | https://www.zaobao.com.sg/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“zaobao.sg 早报” (@zaobaosg), 36,506 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaobaosg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.