Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

 Apple Nuts

@AppleNuts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,678subscribers

+58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001079757039
TypeChannel
Username@AppleNuts
Created13 January 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AppleNuts

Growth

36,61836,67836,6486 August 2026 — 36,620 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,620 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,623 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,621 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,618 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,624 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,618 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,668 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,673 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,678 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net +58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,609–36,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:4736,678+5
12 Aug 2026, 03:2336,673+5
11 Aug 2026, 03:4836,668+50
10 Aug 2026, 00:5436,618-6
8 Aug 2026, 23:5136,624+6
8 Aug 2026, 02:0136,618-3
7 Aug 2026, 04:2336,621-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:0136,623+3
6 Aug 2026, 01:5036,620no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4436,620first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 36,678 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,500
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.369%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held23 (8 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total87,170
Reactions total322
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,489 reactions across 23 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
54436.5%
😱27218.3%
🔥15410.3%
👎1097.32%
🤣1036.92%
👍513.43%
😴432.89%
💯392.62%
😭312.08%
😁261.75%
💩221.48%
🦄211.41%
🆒161.07%
🍌140.94%
🥴80.537%
🤔60.403%
🌭50.336%
👏50.336%
🎉40.269%
🐳30.201%
6 further kinds130.873%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,489reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AppleNuts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈5,890 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📲 Apple 发布 [正式版] 软件更新 * iOS 26.6.1 (23G82) * iPadOS 26.6.1 (23G82) * macOS 26.6.2 (25G82) * iOS 18.7.10 (22H373) * iPadOS 18.7.10 (22H373)

👎2917

10 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈5,910 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🧪 Apple 发布 [测试版] 软件更新 * iOS 27.0 beta 5 (24A5408d) * iPadOS 27.0 beta 5 (24A5408d) * macOS 27.0 beta 5 (26A5406e) * tvOS 27.0 beta 5 (24J5346a) * visionOS 27.0 beta 5 (24M5348b) * watchOS 27.0 beta 5 (24R5347a)

21🎉3

10 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC≈8,170 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Apple 在刚刚发布的 AppleOS 27 测试版中,命名为 beta 6; 但是 OTA 到设备上版本名字是 beta 5; 而目前 Release Notes ,只更新到 beta 4 因此,取三个版本号的平均数,推测本次版本还是 beta 5. https://developer.apple.com/download/os/#ios-restore-images-ipad-new

🤣103😁134🥴2

27 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC≈13,200 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📲 Apple 发布 [正式版] 软件更新 * iOS 26.6 (23G71) * iPadOS 26.6 (23G71) * macOS 26.6 (25G72) * tvOS 26.6 (23L773) * visionOS 26.6 (23O770) * watchOS 26.6 (23U67)

💯3912🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC≈18,600 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

AppleOS 27 Public Beta 2 现已发布,build 与 Developer Beta 4 相同。

29

20 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC≈19,100 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🧪 Apple 发布 [测试版] 软件更新 * visionOS 27.0 beta 4 (24M5326g) * watchOS 27.0 beta 4 (24R5325h)

3

20 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC≈16,300 views46 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

🧪 Apple 发布 [测试版] 软件更新 * iOS 27.0 beta 4 (24A5390f) * iPadOS 27.0 beta 4 (24A5390f) * macOS 27.0 beta 4 (26A5388g) * tvOS 27.0 beta 4 (24J5325d) * iOS 26.6 RC (23G71) * iPadOS 26.6 RC (23G71) * macOS 26.6 RC (25G70) * tvOS 26.6 RC (23L772) * visionOS 26.6 RC (23O770) * watchOS 26.6 RC (23U67)

🔥368👎2

14 Jul 2026, 01:03 UTC≈20,400 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

AppleOS 27 Public Beta 首个公测版已经发布,是基于 Developer Beta 3 的修正版本 (beta 3 v.2),DB3 也已经重新发布。 建议之前升级到 Developer Beta 的用户切换到 Public Beta 频道上以获得可能更稳定的体验。 ⚠️ 如果你看不到 Public Beta 更新频道,可能是因为你没有在 beta.apple.com 注册报名测试公测版。 ‼️iPadOS 27 和 macOS 27 的 PB1 ≠ DB3,在 DB3 的用户建议切换至公测频道并更新 以后只要二者编译版本号相同,你依然可以通过 Developer Beta 固件线刷升级。

40

13 Jul 2026, 20:50 UTC≈14,900 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🧪 Apple 发布 [测试版] 软件更新 * iPadOS 27.0 beta 3 v.2 (24A5380l) * macOS 27.0 beta 3 v.2 (26A5378n) * iOS 26.6 beta 5 (23G5065a) * iPadOS 26.6 beta 5 (23G5065a) * macOS 26.6 beta 5 (25G5065a) * tvOS 26.6 beta 5 (23L5766a) * visionOS 26.6 beta 5 (23O5765a) * watchOS 26.6 beta 5 (23U5062b)

20🍌1

6 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈18,500 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🧪 Apple 发布 [测试版] 软件更新 * iOS 27.0 beta 3 (24A5380h) * iPadOS 27.0 beta 3 (24A5380h) * macOS 27.0 beta 3 (26A5378j) * tvOS 27.0 beta 3 (24J5315i) * visionOS 27.0 beta 3 (24M5316k) * watchOS 27.0 beta 3 (24R5315i) * iOS 26.6 beta 4 (23G5057c) * iPadOS 26.6 beta 4 (23G5057c) * macOS 26.6 beta 4 (25G5057c) * tvOS 26.6 beta 4 (23L5758b) * visionOS 26.6 beta 4 (23O5757c) * watchOS 26.6 beta 4 (23U5054b)

44😱12🍌5👎4👍3

29 Jun 2026, 17:40 UTC≈21,400 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📲 Apple 发布 [正式版] 软件更新 * iOS 26.5.2 (23F84) * iPadOS 26.5.2 (23F84) * macOS 26.5.2 (25F84)

😴367👎3🎃1

29 Jun 2026, 17:40 UTC≈18,200 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🧪 Apple 发布 [测试版] 软件更新 * iOS 26.6 beta 3 (23G5052d) * iPadOS 26.6 beta 3 (23G5052d) * macOS 26.6 beta 3 (25G5052e) * tvOS 26.6 beta 3 (23L5753c) * visionOS 26.6 beta 3 (23O5752d) * watchOS 26.6 beta 3 (23U5049c)

👎14😴74👌1👍1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @AppleNuts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 52,215 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

科技圈🎗在花频道📮
@zaihuapd · 274,310
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 12 August 2026
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 157,320
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
竹新社
@tnews365 · 156,398
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ Apple Nuts” (@AppleNuts), 36,678 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AppleNuts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.