Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

蓝点网订阅频道

@landiansub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

43,366subscribers

+391 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001125882855
TypeChannel
Username@landiansub
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/landiansub

Growth

42,97543,36643,170.56 August 2026 — 42,975 subscribers6 August 2026 — 42,976 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,001 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,038 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43,087 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43,131 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,196 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,252 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,297 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,366 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +391. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,916–43,425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:3843,366+69
13 Aug 2026, 03:0443,297+45
12 Aug 2026, 05:3343,252+56
11 Aug 2026, 03:1243,196+65
10 Aug 2026, 04:1443,131+44
9 Aug 2026, 03:5243,087+49
8 Aug 2026, 04:2043,038+37
7 Aug 2026, 05:5243,001+25
6 Aug 2026, 06:3042,976+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:3542,975first reading

Engagement

97 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.78%
avg views ÷ 43,366 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,810
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
97
of 97 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held97 (4 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total361,860
Reactions total6,567
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 00:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
15,100
Videos
48
Links
13,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

5,860 reactions across 82 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡1,28521.9%
😁1,25521.4%
👎64311.0%
👍4096.98%
🤔2584.40%
🤬2394.08%
🫡2193.74%
1943.31%
🤨1222.08%
🥱1212.06%
🖕1131.93%
🤗1121.91%
😱1101.88%
🙏911.55%
😨881.50%
😭781.33%
💔591.01%
🥴570.973%
🌚560.956%
👏510.87%
22 further kinds3005.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,567reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 95 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @landiansub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 97 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈4,020 views235 reactions5 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#真大佬 来自加拿大的大佬,根据CA法律且不介意法律诉讼🫡🫡🫡 Source:X

🫡219👍11😁4🎉1

14 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈3,440 views52 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

#音频已删请放心观看 ChatGPT 实现微软在 Windows 11 中重点推荐的 Recall 回顾功能,ChatGPT for Mac 推出名为计算机历史的新功能。 该功能会记录用户的点击、输入、应用程序打开 / 切换等,信标事件会被记录并上传服务器生成 AI 时间线和记忆。 用户可以使用该功能快速回溯内容,例如生成当日工作总结、查找最近打开的文档、将重复工作转换为技能或自动化流程等。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/114330?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

🤔42🤨6😁4

14 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈3,450 views99 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#软件资讯 火狐浏览器再次强调,如果禁止谷歌搜索支付搜索分成,那火狐浏览器可能会被切断收入来源,最终导致火狐浏览器死亡。 目前美国监管机构正在继续寻求禁止谷歌搜索向合作伙伴支付搜索分成收益,对谷歌来说支付分成可以让更多合作伙伴将谷歌设置为默认搜索。 而对火狐这类浏览器而言,如果失去谷歌搜索分成,将是灭顶之灾。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/114329?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

😨76🙏11🤡8😁3😢1

14 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC≈3,190 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#人工智能 智谱推出 GLM-5.3,新版本在编程开发和网络安全领域能力显著提升。 据智谱公布的数据,该模型已被用于 269 个真实项目,发现 2436 个有效漏洞,包括 1097 个中高危漏洞。 智谱目前还在对模型进行安全评估和加固,完成加固后将开放权重下载。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/114328?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

💊16🥱4👍2🔥1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈3,510 views62 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#人工智能 ChatGPT 玻区大幅度涨价后目前已经没有低价区,仅菲律宾区价格稍微便宜些。 本周 OpenAI 调整 ChatGPT Plus 等订阅在玻利维亚的订阅价格,调整前约 11.94 美元,调整后约 20.3 美元,因此已经没有价格优势。 当前价格稍微便宜些的是菲律宾区,免税后每月 16.31 美元。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/114327?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

👎37😁16🤯52🍾1👌1

14 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈3,300 views118 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

深度求索已群发调价邮件通知。 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

🤡71😭28👎10🐳4😁3👍1🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC≈3,480 views87 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#软件资讯 下载次数超过 1,100 万的长截图工具 GoFullPage 被谷歌下架,开发者称谷歌过度执法。 该工具仅提供网页长截图功能,工具本身没有版权问题,开发者质疑谷歌这是在过度执法,目前已经联系谷歌进行沟通。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/114316?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

🤡66😡12🖕71😁1

14 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC≈3,430 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#手机数码 苹果将 iPhone X 和 18 款 15 英寸 MacBook Pro 列为过时产品,用户可以继续使用,但苹果不再提供官方的硬件维修服务。 后续如果出现硬件问题,用户只能寻找第三方、非苹果授权的维修商看看有没有拆机零件。 苹果官方以及苹果授权维修商会因为缺少零件因此不提供维修服务。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/114315?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

👎22🤡54😡3💔1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 04:26 UTC≈3,440 views54 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#安全资讯 苹果向全球 110 多个国家和地区的用户发出间谍软件攻击警告,提醒用户加强安全措施保护信息安全。 大多数普通用户不会成为间谍软件攻击目标,通常成为目标的都是政府官员、记者、人权相关人士。 当收到间谍软件攻击通知时,说明苹果已经有确切证据表明用户正在遭受攻击。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/114314?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

😱41👻7🤡3👍2😁1

14 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC≈3,530 views130 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#人工智能 狗听了都摇头:DeepSeek API 涨价也震惊国外开发者,原以为最多翻倍,翻倍后还是很便宜,但没想到是翻好几倍。 昨天晚间深度求索公布 DS API 即将涨价的细节,从 8 月 17 日 0 时起分闲时和高峰时段。 以 DS V4 Pro 为例,命中缓存高峰时段较原价涨幅 1100%、输出涨幅 350%。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/114313?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

🤡108😈12👎5😁31🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC≈3,540 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#网站应用 社交网站 X 宣布大幅度扩大算法开源范围,现已开源核心推荐算法和排名系统,同时提供影子屏蔽系统检测。 影子屏蔽指的是账号看起来没问题但曝光量非常低,即账号有可能被算法悄悄屏蔽推荐。 X 新增的工具可以显示账号标签,用户可以通过标签判断帖子或账号是否被屏蔽。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/114312?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

31🥱3😁3👍1

13 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC≈4,950 views145 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#人工智能 深度求索在官网首页撤回 DeepSeek V4 Pro正式发布的消息,开放平台的公告也被删除。 但API页面没有任何更改,仍然显示最新的是0813。 source:https://api-docs.deepseek.com/zh-cn/quick_start/pricing 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS

🤔96🤡43🤯32😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @landiansub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@landiansub edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 23,712 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

科技圈🎗在花频道📮
@zaihuapd · 275,374
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 12 August 2026
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 158,285
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
竹新社
@tnews365 · 156,525
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
每日沙雕墙
@woshadiao · 115,315
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“蓝点网订阅频道” (@landiansub), 43,366 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/landiansub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.