Codex赠送一张新重置卡
👨💻3

Channel
@landiansub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,199subscribers
+2,224 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001125882855 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @landiansub |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/landiansub |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 45,199 | +349 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 44,850 | +121 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 44,729 | +107 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 44,622 | +61 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 44,561 | +108 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 44,453 | +66 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 44,387 | +120 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 44,267 | +46 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 44,221 | +62 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:03 | 44,159 | +18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:24 | 44,141 | +28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 44,113 | +28 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 44,085 | +33 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 44,052 | +29 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 44,023 | +39 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 43,984 | +37 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 43,947 | +42 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 43,905 | +46 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 43,859 | +44 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 43,815 | first reading |
529 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 529 (4 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,165,770 |
| Reactions total | 19,352 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 22:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36,155 reactions across 511 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 8,220 | 22.7% | |
| 😁 | 8,167 | 22.6% | |
| 👍 | 4,104 | 11.4% | |
| 👎 | 2,883 | 7.97% | |
| 🖕 | 1,279 | 3.54% | |
| ❤ | 1,156 | 3.20% | |
| 🤬 | 1,059 | 2.93% | |
| 🤔 | 799 | 2.21% | |
| 🫡 | 622 | 1.72% | |
| 🤯 | 590 | 1.63% | |
| 🥱 | 581 | 1.61% | |
| 👌 | 532 | 1.47% | |
| 🤪 | 501 | 1.39% | |
| 🤗 | 482 | 1.33% | |
| 😭 | 463 | 1.28% | |
| 😱 | 435 | 1.20% | |
| 🕊 | 378 | 1.05% | |
| 💊 | 377 | 1.04% | |
| 👏 | 333 | 0.921% | |
| 🌚 | 299 | 0.827% | |
| 31 further kinds | 2,895 | 8.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 524 of the 529 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,862 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 529 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @landiansub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 529 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Codex赠送一张新重置卡
👨💻3
Claude 多项服务出现大面积异常,大量用户报告无法正常使用。
🍾71😭11😁3🤡1
#Codex重大调整 200 美元的 ChatGPT Pro 20x 版订阅将在明天恢复,但按照 API 消费金额计算额度将缩水 50%。 蒂博称虽然消费金额缩水但实际可以完成更多工作,也就是按照工作量计算的话新版更好。 OpenAI 希望快速降低 API 价格并提高模型能力,最终就是 200 美元订阅和 200 美元充值 API 效果相同。 另外蒂博还强调不希望人为抬高 API 定价让用户看起来订阅额度更高,然后通过变相方式悄悄缩减额度。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127158?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
👎157🤬10🤡7👍3😁2❤1
#软件资讯 123 云盘就 9 月 24 日调整空间规则致歉,不过不会撤回规则,而是老用户如果不爽的话可以申请部分退款。 9 月 24 日 123 云盘调整空间规则,分成标准空间和专业空间,其中海量标准空间只能用来存储与他人共享的重复文件,真正能存储独属文件的只有专业空间。 123 云盘希望通过这种方式压低服务器存储量,但这也会影响部分专业用户的使用,例如备份 PC 上的文件都是独属性质的,这些都会占用本来配额就很少的专业空间。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127101?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
🤡117💊7❤1😁1
#系统资讯 苹果发布 iOS 26.7.1 版修复图形组件高危漏洞,该漏洞已经被黑客用于展开攻击,但是否与近期币圈发生的攻击有关还无法确认。 CVE-2026-86950 位于 CoreGraphics 组件中,涉及图像、界面和其他视觉内容渲染。 近期有恶意应用针对币圈用户发起攻击,因此有人将该漏洞与币圈攻击联系起来,不过从已知情况来看币圈发生的攻击主要应该还是 DarkSword 攻击链,可能与最新修复的漏洞无关。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127100?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
😁4
#人工智能 AMD 以 82 亿美元收购空间智能 & 世界模型公司 World Labs,李飞飞教授将加盟 AMD 担任首席科学家兼执行副总裁。 World Labs 主要研究能够理解、生成和模拟三维环境的世界模型,其模型可以根据文字、图片或视频生成具有空间连贯性的交互式 3D 世界。 AMD 希望通过这次收购帮助 AMD 判断未来模型对芯片、软件和系统架构提出的新需求,这会影响 AMD 的未来设计方向。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127099?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
🥱8😁1
#人工智能 因潜在安全和不诚实问题,OpenAI 已决定暂缓发布 GPT-6.1 Astra 模型,原本该模型计划在近期发布。 在内部评估中,团队发现模型有时候未能诚实准确地向用户说明自己在做什么,即表现出较高的欺骗性。 另外模型在任务受阻后可能会在未经充分授权的情况下就继续操作,例如调用外部工具和服务等。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127098?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
🤡75😁14💊1
#网站应用 重磅消息:GitHub 已禁止使用 Outlook 和 Hotmail 邮箱注册新账号,原因是持续遭到黑灰产团伙利用以上邮箱注册账号和滥用。 以前黑灰产团伙都喜欢使用 Outlook 和 Hotmail 注册 GitHub 账号,这些邮箱用户量大且信誉较好因此通常不会被平台拦截。 现在 GitHub 都下定决心封禁 Outlook 和 Hotmail,只能说也是受不了了。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127097?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
😁122🤡25🥴6👍5❤4🍾2🎉2🫡2
#软件资讯 微软为 Excel 带来重磅新功能:可以在一个单元格里存储多个值,并支持后续的函数计算。 以上功能名为列表,即通过英文半角分号或逗号将结构化值隔开,Excel 可以识别值而不是将其作为文本字符串处理。 配套提供的还包括单元格数组和嵌套数组以及四个配套的新函数。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127096?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
🤡32👏1😁1
#技术教程 有用户发现禁用 Windows 11 8.3 短文件名机制后资源管理器性能明显提升,如果是开发者的话建议禁用试试看。 8.3 别名机制是为兼容 MS-DOS 时代的 8 字符文件名 + 3 字符扩展名而存在,即便是 Windows 11 也还保留这种机制。 有用户禁用该机制后发现资源管理器平铺、滚动、与安卓互传文件的性能有明显提升。 不过前提是目录里含有海量文件,如果文件较少那禁用后也不会明显改善。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127095?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
🥱43💊8🤡5😁2
#系统资讯 Windows 11 测试版新增自定义鼠标指针颜色功能,还可以按 Ctrl 显示鼠标位置等。 这些功能被放在辅助功能里,其中自定义颜色主要用户群是色盲症用户,当然普通用户也可以使用。 而指示器功能对高分屏和带鱼屏用户来说可能比较实用,启用功能后只需要按 Ctrl 即可显示向内收缩的黑色大圆环标记鼠标位置。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127094?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
😴32👍3🥱2😁1
#软件资讯 Office 出现小面积掉激活问题:微软最新推送的可选更新意外删除 Office 许可证,用户可能会看到未授权产品和文档无法编辑的问题。 问题更新是 KB5002907,该更新原本是用来修复 Microsoft 365 组件无法更新的问题,但存在意外删除 Office 2016/2019 许可证甚至卸载软件包的情况。 微软目前已经停止推送问题更新,遇到这个问题的用户需要使用原始许可证重新激活或重新安装。 查看全文:https://ourl.co/127093?t 😁订阅 🤔解封 🥰推特 🎉CN2VPS
🤡79😁6❤3🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 529 posts we hold for @landiansub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@landiansub edited 14 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 80 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“蓝点网订阅频道” (@landiansub), 45,199 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/landiansub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.