Channel
@CE_Observe
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
77,552subscribers
+5,206 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001117953321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CE_Observe |
| Description | 不公正 不客观 不理性 投稿 / 反馈 / 闲聊 / 发傻 / 和动物成为朋友 / USB Type-C 不收快科技的稿源 子频道 @Hearse_Drifting 除上述讨论群及子频道外，本频道与其他频道 / 讨论群无任何关联 头像 shorturl.at/XQE9r |
| Created | 5 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CE_Observe |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @acgdaily | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 5 minutes | this entry (11–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 273 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:31 | 77,552 | +50 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:45 | 77,502 | +94 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:19 | 77,408 | +97 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:15 | 77,311 | +100 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:59 | 77,211 | +88 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:35 | 77,123 | +43 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:21 | 77,080 | +34 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:01 | 77,046 | +52 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 76,994 | +75 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:48 | 76,919 | +105 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:47 | 76,814 | +51 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 76,763 | +85 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 76,678 | +75 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 76,603 | +41 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:01 | 76,562 | +46 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 76,516 | +41 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:17 | 76,475 | +35 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 76,440 | +26 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:54 | 76,414 | +18 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 76,396 | first reading |
825 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 825 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,572,030 |
| Reactions total | 26,295 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 07:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
78,078 reactions across 812 posts, in 64 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 22,141 | 28.4% | |
| 🤡 | 9,217 | 11.8% | |
| 💩 | 8,310 | 10.6% | |
| 🤣 | 8,062 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 5,344 | 6.84% | |
| 🖕 | 2,320 | 2.97% | |
| 🤯 | 1,811 | 2.32% | |
| 🤮 | 1,475 | 1.89% | |
| 🤔 | 1,383 | 1.77% | |
| 👏 | 1,356 | 1.74% | |
| 🥰 | 1,351 | 1.73% | |
| 👎 | 1,246 | 1.60% | |
| 🔥 | 1,092 | 1.40% | |
| ❤ | 905 | 1.16% | |
| 😱 | 899 | 1.15% | |
| 🤬 | 795 | 1.02% | |
| 🍾 | 794 | 1.02% | |
| 🥴 | 692 | 0.886% | |
| 💊 | 650 | 0.833% | |
| 🎉 | 629 | 0.806% | |
| 44 further kinds | 7,606 | 9.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 825 of the 825 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79,071 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 825 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CE_Observe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 825 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 73 of 287 posts held from the last 30 days (25.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
手机涨价冲击波：主流厂商不再推千元新机 超500万用户首次购买二手机？ NIQ研报显示，今年上半年购买二手机的用户中，约三分之一为首购用户。这意味着二手消费成为大量普通消费者在涨价周期里做出的主动选择。江瀚称，消费者对二手高性价比机型的接受度，已经从“省钱妥协”变成主流消费选择，高位运行至少延续到2027年，不会快速回落。 https://finance.eastmoney.com/~
😭23😁7💊2🥰2
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
微软游说美政府叫停中国光模块拟议禁令，称或拖慢AI数据中心建设 https://original.ifeng.com/c/8xxOjnpzW2j
😁64🖕4
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
AMD 推出嵌入式 EPYC 9006 处理器，最高256核心和 1GB L3 缓存 https://benchlife.info/amd-epyc-embedded-9006-series-sp7-cpu/ 这还叫嵌入式吗？？
🤯62🥰6🍾1👍1
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
泰国出台数据中心环境新规，噪音限 70 分贝，温升不超 2 摄氏度 https://www.thaiheadlines.com/194785/
👍32😁14🎉1👎1👏1🤔1
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
微软 XBOX One 主机将支持《GTA6》云游戏，但 PC 玩家无缘 https://www.ithome.com/~
😁43🤣6🤡3🍾2
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
漫步者 PW108“广场级音效”蓝牙音响发售：20W 额定功率，到手 699 元 https://www.ithome.com/~
😁44🤮26💩7🖕4🤯3
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
工信部批复10家企业开展号码保护服务业务试点 在外卖、网约车等高频场景中，用户可自主选择启用号码保护服务。试点企业的业务开通后，骑手、司机等可通过700开头15位的中间号与用户进行双向通话，通话过程中相互隐藏真实号码。同时，依托来电显示、接通前语音播报等方式，用户可进一步获悉来电的使用场景、平台主体等信息，实现“放心接、明白接”。 https://www.news.cn/~
🤡43👍9🖕3🤮1
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
印度塔塔电子3名工人疑吸入有毒气体死亡 https://original.ifeng.com/c/8xwBwwQ0m5g 你可真会给苹果来事
😁63😱18💩3🤯3🙏3
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
微软新专利想租用大家闲置GPU训练AI https://www.4gamers.com.tw/news/detail/83195/ 可问题是训练 AI 讲究连续性难以分割成小型任务
🤡83😁7👍5👎2🍾1🤮1
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
小二打字学汉语拼音，香港教育局：粤语标音系统欠一致，师生不易掌握 https://www.hk01.com/article/60408797
👍50🤡26🖕10🗿3
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
日本Rapidus 尚未生产出可用的 SRAM，2027 财年内量产目标面临挑战 https://www.ithome.com/~
🤡39😁8👍3🤔1😴1
Signed 无羽の翼 (｢ • ̀ω•́ )｢
全球最强 AI 模型：Claude Fable 5.2 登场，编程超 GPT-6 Astra、登顶多项基准 https://m.ithome.com/html/1024796.htm
🤡50👍10🍾2
Signed horo
Showing the 12 most recent of 825 posts we hold for @CE_Observe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@CE_Observe edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
甲骨文发布通知 免费VPS必须在8月18日前主动降配 否则删鸡
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 825 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 79 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“每日消费电子观察” (@CE_Observe), 77,552 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CE_Observe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.