中行万事达卡疑似遭大规模盗刷:Apple Pay用户紧急锁卡,原因待查 https://finance.sina.com.cn/jryx/2026-09-26/doc-initcyza0450311.shtml
😇36😱12🎉6🍾2😁2
Signed 无羽の翼 (「 • ̀ω•́ )「

Channel
@CE_Observe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
75,036subscribers
+2,690 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001117953321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CE_Observe |
| Description | 因广告机器人出没,评论区禁止使用频道身份发言,发送垃圾信息可能会被bot封禁。如果你想匿名、被误封或是在海外生活,欢迎PM @MizuhashiZ 添加白名单 不公正 不客观 不理性 投稿 / 反馈 / 闲聊 / 发傻 / 和动物成为朋友 / USB Type-C 不收快科技的稿源 子频道 @Hearse_Drifting 除上述讨论群及子频道外,本频道与其他频道 / 讨论群无任何关联 头像 shorturl.at/XQE9r |
| Created | 5 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CE_Observe |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 75,036 | +242 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 74,794 | +110 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 74,684 | +54 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 74,630 | +114 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 74,516 | +189 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 74,327 | +209 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 74,118 | +66 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 74,052 | +50 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 74,002 | +40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 73,962 | +17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 73,945 | +41 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 73,904 | +80 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 73,824 | +49 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 73,775 | +70 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 73,705 | +44 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 73,661 | +51 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 73,610 | +61 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 73,549 | +28 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 73,521 | +56 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 73,465 | first reading |
419 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 419 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,518,570 |
| Reactions total | 25,736 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 01:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
39,990 reactions across 406 posts, in 58 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 12,684 | 31.7% | |
| 🤡 | 5,241 | 13.1% | |
| 💩 | 4,913 | 12.3% | |
| 🤣 | 3,574 | 8.94% | |
| 👍 | 2,635 | 6.59% | |
| 🖕 | 1,339 | 3.35% | |
| 🤮 | 814 | 2.04% | |
| 🥰 | 754 | 1.89% | |
| 🤯 | 666 | 1.67% | |
| 🤔 | 562 | 1.41% | |
| 🔥 | 493 | 1.23% | |
| 🤬 | 417 | 1.04% | |
| 👎 | 413 | 1.03% | |
| 😨 | 383 | 0.958% | |
| 😱 | 378 | 0.945% | |
| 👏 | 365 | 0.913% | |
| ❤ | 349 | 0.873% | |
| 🍾 | 340 | 0.85% | |
| 😢 | 306 | 0.765% | |
| 💊 | 237 | 0.593% | |
| 38 further kinds | 3,127 | 7.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 419 of the 419 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,983 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 419 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CE_Observe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 419 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
中行万事达卡疑似遭大规模盗刷:Apple Pay用户紧急锁卡,原因待查 https://finance.sina.com.cn/jryx/2026-09-26/doc-initcyza0450311.shtml
😇36😱12🎉6🍾2😁2
Signed 无羽の翼 (「 • ̀ω•́ )「
加拿大餐厅为省钱用AI生成美食照,食客反感称像塑胶 https://ccue.singtao.ca/~ 日本餐饮店大量使用AI 生成图片引发争议,网友质疑「连自家料理都不愿意好好拍?」 https://www.toy-people.com/~
😁44🤮7
Signed 无羽の翼 (「 • ̀ω•́ )「
外交部发言人就人工智能问题答记者问 问:我们注意到,美方在介绍此次访问成果时,使用“超级智能”代替“人工智能”。请问中方有何评论? 答:中美元首会晤时,就人工智能问题进行了深入讨论。关于人工智能表述问题,中方重视美方的立场,也尊重美方的提法。人工智能技术正在持续发展,各方可以结合最新形势,加强交流、深入探讨、寻求共识。 ========== 我将用最直白,最不绕弯子的方式告诉你,我没绷住 https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/fyrbt_673021/202609/t20260926_12031638.shtml
🤣79😁5❤2🤡2🖕1
Signed horo
微软提醒 Win11 禁用 8.3 文件名:可提升文件操作速度,但影响应用兼容性 https://www.ithome.com/1/007/365.htm 尽管性能收益明确,微软警告直接剥离既有 8.3 名称而不处理依赖项,或引发应用意外故障,包括软件卸载失败。
😁44🤡11👍2💩1🔥1
Signed septs
安卓 / Linux / macOS / Windows 四大主流系统曝隐私风险:靠文件变化侧推监控用户 https://www.ithome.com/1/007/378.htm 研究人员表示某些应用即使看不到文件内容,也可能通过文件名和文件变化时间,推测你的操作、浏览行为和通信活动。研究显示通过这种“行为侧写”方式,攻击者能监测用户何时敲击了键盘、何时接收 / 删除了文件,以及网站访问及应用活动。 在 Linux 上,通过监听可读的 /dev/input 目录,即可精确捕捉每次按键的时刻。在七名测试用户中,该攻击的按键检测准确率介于 93.1% 至 100% 之间。Linux 内核针对 CVE-2025-68788 进行了部分加固,防止 inotify 对特殊文件生成某些访问和修改事件。 ———— 某非主流系统:?
🍾45🤔12🤯6
Signed septs
三大运营商暂停金融分期业务,“0元购机”全面停办 https://finance.sina.com.cn/~
👍72😁31🖕4👏1
Signed 无羽の翼 (「 • ̀ω•́ )「
苹果曾最高收取 0.15% 支付手续费:Apple Pay 反垄断诉讼案获关键进展 https://www.ithome.com/~
😁40👍1
Signed 无羽の翼 (「 • ̀ω•́ )「
LG 电子被印度追缴约 15.4 亿卢比关税 https://www.ithome.com/1/007/169.htm 据披露,该通知由海关专员办公室(NS-V)发出,拟追缴金额为 15,357,67,711 卢比。LG 电子印度公司表示正在审查此事,并计划在规定期限内提交回复,同时主张公司已完全遵守海关法规。 印度《1962 年海关法》第 14 条及《2007 年海关估价(进口货物价值确定)规则》规定,买方直接或间接作为货物销售条件而支付的特许权使用费和许可费,应计入进口商品的交易价值。争议通常集中于特许权使用费是否构成“销售条件”,以及其与进口货物之间是否存在明确关联。 ———— 印度提款机开机
😁116🎉4❤1🤡1
Signed septs
我国科学家揭示铁电材料失效机制:提出氮空位拓扑稳定调控方案,铁电存储器循环寿命突破 100 亿次 https://www.ithome.com/1/007/148.htm https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aec7337 两种手段协同作用,维持了氮空位空间构型在长期电应力下的稳定性。测试显示,该方案制备的超晶格器件在保持完全极化翻转条件下,实现超过 100 亿次循环耐久性,与此前纪录相比提升约两个数量级;器件经历 10 亿次循环后存储信号衰减控制在 3% 以内。
👍53🆒5❤1🖕1
Signed septs
微软 Excel 告别「一格一值」限制,单一储存格支持多重数值与巢状阵列 https://www.hkepc.com/~
🆒62🤨21😱9👍2👎2
Signed 无羽の翼 (「 • ̀ω•́ )「
ChatGPT Pro Max订阅正在准备中 预计为500美元/月 提供50x额度 https://www.landian.news/archives/127092.html 不过现在 OpenAI 还未透露什么时候会推出 50x 版,从前端代码中只能确认 OpenAI 已经在积极准备中,到时候现有套餐也可以升级到 50x 版。
💩93😁5❤1
Signed septs
微软确认9月更新导致Windows 11 Always On VPN无法连接 主要影响自动切换的VPN https://www.landian.news/archives/127090.html 目前 Always On VPN 出现的问题是,相关连接由于切换异常导致始终停留在正在连接状态且不断尝试连接,随后出现指定端口已经使用的错误提示。根据微软的调查,在自动选择协议时首次失败后再次尝试连接就有可能导致连接资源无法释放,因此最终会提示端口已经被使用。
💩26🥰20
Signed septs
Showing the 12 most recent of 419 posts we hold for @CE_Observe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@CE_Observe edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
甲骨文发布通知 免费VPS必须在8月18日前主动降配 否则删鸡
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 419 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 74 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“每日消费电子观察” (@CE_Observe), 75,036 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CE_Observe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.