Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 电报时报

Channel

电报时报

@times001

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

84,547subscribers

-623 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001295722188
TypeChannel
Username@times001
Description投稿点频道左下角对话图标
Created4 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/times001

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi/5242430 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC@times001/821874 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC1.0013 hours
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi/527302 Sept 2026, 04:03 UTC@times001/822131 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC1.005.0 hours
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi/5396612 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC@times001/823203 · this entry12 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC1.001.5 hours
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi/5474118 Sept 2026, 23:30 UTC@times001/823882 · this entry19 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC1.0012 hours
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi/561533 Oct 2026, 02:00 UTC@times001/824991 · this entry3 Oct 2026, 10:39 UTC1.008.7 hours
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi/561983 Oct 2026, 15:31 UTC@times001/825039 · this entry3 Oct 2026, 15:50 UTC1.0020 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi67 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005.5 hours@lilaoshibushinilaoshi (67–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 67 of the 67 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 573 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

84,38185,17084,775.584,5476 August 202612 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 98 days, net -623. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84,263–85,288 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 12:5084,547+50
10 Nov 2026, 09:3684,497+116
8 Nov 2026, 20:4184,381-27
7 Nov 2026, 09:5684,408-4
5 Nov 2026, 04:0984,412+10
4 Nov 2026, 03:5584,402-10
3 Nov 2026, 05:3184,412-5
2 Nov 2026, 07:5084,417-2
1 Nov 2026, 06:3984,419-4
31 Oct 2026, 08:1984,423-12
30 Oct 2026, 09:4084,435-21
29 Oct 2026, 09:3784,456+12
28 Oct 2026, 05:5884,444+20
27 Oct 2026, 03:3584,424-15
26 Oct 2026, 02:4784,439-13
25 Oct 2026, 03:1084,452-9
24 Oct 2026, 00:2784,461-5
23 Oct 2026, 00:1984,466+16
21 Oct 2026, 21:4984,450-28
20 Oct 2026, 14:0084,478first reading

Engagement

2,119 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 200 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.747%
avg views ÷ 84,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
632
616 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.275%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
616
of 2,119 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 356 of 616 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held2,119 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total389,012
Reactions total697
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈20,700
Videos
≈10,500
Links
≈25,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 12m
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 123 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,132 reactions across 504 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍49944.1%
❤22920.2%
💩1109.72%
🤣877.69%
😁837.33%
😈494.33%
🤡242.12%
😱161.41%
👎100.883%
🤬70.618%
🤔50.442%
🥱50.442%
😢40.353%
😍30.265%
💔10.088%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 538 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 September 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 50 of 616 posts held from the last 30 days (8.12%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC303 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

1.卢思位在11.12日13:20向朋友发出求救信息:“我被控制在西安碑林区太白路派出所,发出去。我没法给外界联系。” 电话陕西西安碑林区太白路派出所 029-88466500,对方称是值班人员,我坚持要知道卢思位和王宇律师的情况,后值班人员叫来警察,警察承认卢思位律师在这里,称在做问讯,但声称不知道王宇律师的情况。 网上查到的太白路派出所电话:029-88466500、029-88403951(或029-88466550) 2.昨天与思位最后一次联系是洛杉矶时间下午5点,我刚准备下班,他发信息来说女儿生日的事,又说要去法院,晚点联系。 晚上休息时我给他留言,没回。早上起来就看到他又被非法拘禁。

13 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC293 views0 reactionsread 13 November 2026

大学生免费领养小猫背上九千多元分期债务,逾期年化利率131.4%,「猫贷」可能有哪些坑?法律上合理吗? ▎Source

13 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC250 viewsread 13 November 2026

中方对美关税调整,两月内继续暂停实施 24% 的加征关税税率,保留 10% 的加征关税税率,如何解读? ▎Source

13 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC245 viewsread 13 November 2026

大学要求 4 年必须完成跑步 570 多公里,否则不能评优,这一要求是否合理? ▎Source

13 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC269 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026

马斯克X平台放宽发帖限制:单帖最多上传20个图片和视频文件 社交平台X移动工程负责人Jonah Katz在平台发文称,X已将单条帖子可添加的图片和视频文件总数上限从4个提高至20个。新功能已在网页版上线,iOS和Android用户将应用升级至最新版本后也可使用。 Katz表示,Twitter及更名后的X在过去约十年间,一直将单帖图片和视频数量限制在四个。此次调整将媒体文件数量上限扩大至原来的五倍,用户发布较多图片或视频时,不再需要拆分为多条帖子。Katz为演示这项功能,在原帖中一次上传了20张风景照片。多张媒体文件将以横向滑动的形式展示,用户可以在同一条帖子中连续浏览。 —— 凤凰网科技

👍1

13 Nov 2026, 06:09 UTC263 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026

【黄乐旗下公司投资了DeepSeek,并承诺提供英伟达芯片】

👍1

13 Nov 2026, 06:09 UTC262 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026

彭博社披露黄仁勋辞职前的最后时光:把自己骂成“一坨屎”。全文如下:

👍1

13 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Iggie🚁: 中国“超级孤独”的一代人:情感风险算计背后是经验匮乏 有些室友共用厨房和卫生间,却刻意不认识彼此——理由是“建立关系太累”、“有风险”。人类学家项飙发现,他们怕的并非人身风险,而是情感风险。 “双十一”刚落幕,据称今年销售额近2670亿美元。次日,对项飙的法文专访《中国正经历一场“超级孤独”危机》(La Chine traverse une crise de l’hypersolitude)开篇写道:中国历史上连接最紧密、流动性最强的一代,成了最孤独的一代人。 项飙以“附近消失”(the disappearance of the nearby)来描述这种处境:高楼林立而邻里疏离,农村学校撤并让一些孩子过早进入机构化生活,手机包办一切。便利背后是飘忽不安。 年轻人常被说“一不顺心就辞职”。项飙认为,他们有逃离的自由,却未必有改变人生的自由。上世纪90年代,他在东莞调查外来务工者时发现,有人一与同事或上司起冲…

👍1

13 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC253 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

大漂亮| C Labs: 国内开始严打加密了😅 有粉丝暴料说因为出入金,被罚了八千块😂 不仅被关了15小时,而且所有银行卡都被封了😭 https://twitter.com/giantcutie666/status/2121068978235752726

❤1

13 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC253 viewsread 13 November 2026

𝓕𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓰: 【还是西药灵】受欧盟相关劳动法的影响,为避免制裁; 中国海康威视从下周开始取消大小周,改为每周双休,上班时间更改为早9晚6(中间休息1小时),加班全部需要申请,申请通过后有加班工资。 https://twitter.com/Finding8964/status/2121061737512218824

13 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC250 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026

大厂白洁: 朝鲜正式公布新宪法全文,停止免费医疗。 11月11日,朝鲜对外宣传网站"我的国家"把《朝鲜民主主义人民共和国宪法》全文挂回网上。 有分析注意到,旧版朝鲜宪法"公民有免费接受治疗的权利",新版的表述则是"公民有接受治疗的权利"。"免费"两个字被删掉了。 https://twitter.com/santoulang/status/2121049227791114713

👍1

13 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC246 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

魔都老猿: 谁给了“速成车”通关的底气? 严惩姜春生! 中汽研武汉检测公司副总姜春生被查,通报只有一句话,没金额也没细节。 审查归中汽中心纪委,调查却交给了千里之外的云南普洱监委。 异地指定管辖,多半是为了绕开本地关系网。 这已经是四年里第四个出事的人。前三个是工信部装备工业发展中心的姚勇、郑贺悦、胡葳,也都曾在中汽中心工作过。四起案子,全由普洱方面调查,只是官方没说有没有关联。 他们守的正是新车上市前的准入和检测关。现在车企开发周期从燃油车时代的约60个月压到24个月,个别甚至12个月。有新能源车企测车门把手,1万次里只有2000次是实物测试,剩下8000次全靠仿真跑出来。 车上市快,验证被压缩,问题只能等用户买回家才暴露。今年上半年国内召回约165万辆,自主品牌比去年同期涨了681.2%。 更扎心的是,检测这道门本就难监督。中汽中心既参与定标准,又做强制检测,还通过下属机构发布评价。定规则、执行规则、解释规则…

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,119 posts we hold for @times001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Nov 2026, 06:49 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

你认为黄仁勋应该辞职吗?

  1. 应该辞职26%
  2. 不应该辞职68%
  3. 其他6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTCAnonymous Poll82 voters

美国中期选举你希望谁胜利,民主党还是共和党?

  1. 希望民主党胜利52%
  2. 希望共和党胜利27%
  3. 其他21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 September 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

在花🎗️科技圈
@zaihuapd · 290,142
#1
竹新社
@tnews365 · 167,192
#2
学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 86,381
#3
中国悲剧档案官方频道
@newszg_official · 156,309
#4
LoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 73,288
#5
每日消费电子观察
@CE_Observe · 77,679
#6
每日沙雕墙
@woshadiao · 114,505
#7
Solidot
@solidot · 48,811
#8
梁家河邮报
@liangjiahepost · 18,457
#9
简中互联网废物大赏
@fucku_idiot · 41,850
#10
小红书一瞥
@xhsyp · 31,007
#11
某科学的一个频道
@titan_pain · 20,849
#12
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 49,209
#13
2.5次元日常 🍉
@acgdaily · 17,329
#14
🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代
@shixun160 · 22,704
#15
知乎暴论
@mightyflame · 25,381
#16
中国数字时代
@cdtchinesefeed · 51,932
#17
☠️三战快报☠️一级战备
@endofxi · 22,085
#18
Iyouport
@iyouport · 27,602
#19
微信搬运工
@wxbyg · 19,218
#20
警察這裡有大麻🌿
@dododolidadada · 9,814
#21
心灵魔法站
@personal_hub · 11,582
#22
敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 72,526
#23
方舟子
@fangshimin · 15,831
#24
【华尔街见闻】- 财经时讯 | AI 实时互动
@FinanceNewsDaily · 59,368
#25
觉醒攻略
@juexinggonglue · 15,806
#26
新天地 🌏 网海宝藏※家园群系
@xintiandi9 · 10,060
#27
沙雕日常图鉴
@moyu2023 · 8,895
#28
Newlearnerの自留地
@NewlearnerChannel · 68,297
#29
豆瓣精选
@douban_read · 35,213
#30
微博精选
@weibo_read · 18,839
#31
Mandark個人倉庫
@Mandark_5678 · 4,665
#32
「VoP」維尼之聲 - Voice of Pooh🔊
@VoiceofPooh · 22,167
#33
华夏画报
@luojisw001 · 3,688
#34
隐私中国 Dark Web Inform
@CN_Privacy · 17,115
#35
APPDO的互联网记忆
@appdopic · 16,962
#36
信息安全技术频道🔎
@tg_InternetSecurity · 10,531
#37
HimalayaNews
@NFSCHimalayaNews · 9,234
#38
中年人生存报告
@dogdairy · 14,261
#39
TG吃瓜黑料八卦
@baguabox · 33,146
#40
龙潭誌异
@dragonsden2k · 2,544
#41
Ruters乳透社🐻
@Ruters0615 · 25,110
#42
即刻精选
@jike_collection · 35,913
#43
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 200,273
#44
MJJ出征
@wearemjj · 9,735
#45
Yummy 😋
@GodlyNews1 · 71,235
#46
cnBeta.COM中文业界资讯站 - 总频道(精选新闻)
@cnbeta_com · 27,396
#47
财经慢报
@Financial_Express · 36,957
#48
不存在的世界
@illusory_world · 11,118
#49
荔枝木
@lychee_wood · 17,830
#50
404通訊|The CCP-China Watch #资讯 #新闻 #时政 #反賊 #覺醒
@chinaupdate · 6,194
#51
Telo News 简体中文 - 加密货币|DeFi |Web3
@telonews_cn · 79,720
#52
蓝点网订阅频道
@landiansub · 47,142
#53
主机百科资讯分享
@zhujiwiki_info · 10,676
#54
平壤卫视
@pingrangTV · 29,366
#55
VPS信号旗播报
@vps_xhq · 50,835
#56
LetITFly News
@LetITFlyW · 9,732
#57
Karen医生の日常
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,352
#58
树洞🌳群友问❓有点意思🗳
@qunyouwen · 89,030
#59
美国之音
@voachinese · 42,209
#60
品测
@SIM_CN · 9,993
#61
〄FW
@JISFW · 12,885
#62
灵车漂移
@Hearse_Drifting · 10,901
#63
煎蛋无聊图
@jandan_pic · 25,561
#64
ahhhhfs|A姐分享
@abskoop · 303,754
#65
副业赚钱探索指南
@text1024 · 20,334
#66

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代
@shixun160 · 22,704
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
☠️三战快报☠️一级战备
@endofxi · 22,085
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
影音中国(中国被禁的视频)
@TwtVideoOfChina · 78,507
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
「VoP」維尼之聲 - Voice of Pooh🔊
@VoiceofPooh · 22,167
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
Ruters乳透社🐻
@Ruters0615 · 25,110
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
全网吃瓜
@DBHR8 · 18,479
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 5 October 2026
中国悲剧档案官方频道
@newszg_official · 156,309
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
文明观球理性吃瓜
@aimeinv88 · 23,989
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 18 September 2026
知乎暴论
@mightyflame · 25,381
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 13 September 2026
中国数字时代
@cdtchinesefeed · 51,932
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 72,526
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 86,381
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 49,209
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
777文宣傳播稿件大合集
@hkposter777 · 22,588
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
俄罗斯资讯参考频道
@JShangrong · 24,112
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
zaobao.sg 早报
@zaobaosg · 46,565
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
TG吃瓜黑料八卦
@baguabox · 33,146
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 4 September 2026
FREE 中文
@freechinese · 27,773
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
Iyouport
@iyouport · 27,602
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
RTHK即時新聞
@rthk_new_c · 48,925
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
看鉴中国 OutsightChina
@OutsightChina · 41,905
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
外滩读书会-最新报纸、杂志、财经报告及流行电子书分享
@readingclubus · 28,761
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 8 September 2026
NOW 新聞
@nowtv_news · 42,370
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
【华尔街见闻】- 财经时讯 | AI 实时互动
@FinanceNewsDaily · 59,368
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“电报时报” (@times001), 84,547 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/times001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.