中国的税收抓捕让富裕精英比以往更受压迫 交流讨论加电报人群: @three001

Channel
电报时报
@times001
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
84,754subscribers
-416 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001295722188 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @times001 |
| Description | 投稿点频道左下角对话图标 |
| Created | 4 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/times001 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 84,754 | -160 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 84,914 | -42 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 84,956 | +33 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 84,923 | +13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 84,910 | -19 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 84,929 | -27 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:54 | 84,956 | -65 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 85,021 | -33 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 85,054 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 85,045 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 85,034 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 85,045 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 85,044 | +7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 85,037 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 85,039 | +53 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 84,986 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 84,978 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 84,983 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 85,000 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 85,022 | first reading |
Engagement
1,139 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.21%
- avg views ÷ 84,754 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,030
- 587 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.247%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 587
- of 1,139 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 286 of 587 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,139 (5 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 602,491 |
| Reactions total | 823 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 00:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈20,200
- Videos
- ≈10,900
- Links
- ≈24,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 19m
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 135 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,280 reactions across 429 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 364 | 28.4% | |
| ❤ | 255 | 19.9% | |
| 💩 | 212 | 16.6% | |
| 😈 | 127 | 9.92% | |
| 🤡 | 95 | 7.42% | |
| 😁 | 80 | 6.25% | |
| 🤣 | 64 | 5.00% | |
| 👎 | 17 | 1.33% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 1.09% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 1.09% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 0.703% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 0.703% | |
| 🤬 | 9 | 0.703% | |
| 🥱 | 7 | 0.547% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.313% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 487 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,280 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
“贷款中介集体删除朋友圈”冲上热搜,重磅新规马上实施,“低风险”“秒到账”“高收益”“无成本”这些话,不能再用了
韩国“习近平”中餐厅遭闯入破坏 警方拟申请逮捕令追逃回国的中国4嫌
中国据报扩大出境限制范围 涵盖部分AI及芯片行业高管直系亲属
潘石屹旧视频突现网络 回国与政治立场引热议
9月27日,广州草莓音乐节演出期间,因有观众参与“开圈/转圈跑”等互动行为,现场舞台随后播放公安机关警告通告,称该行为“严重扰乱音乐节现场秩序”,已违反《治安管理处罚法》。通告还称,警方已通过无人机航拍取证,并有“3名顽固分子已被警方带离调查”。 事件引发大量观众不满,现场人群集体齐声大喊“退票”。事件引发网友热议“没见过哪个音乐节不让转圈的”,“办个儒学节一人拿本弟子规在台下边念边摇头” 查看原文
🤣1
习近平访美,中美进入“竞争性稳定”关系!|王局拍案20260928
方舟子回忆录:我是怎么成为无业游民的(十五) →
💩1
AB Kuai.Dong: 见证人类历史。今晚马斯克的 SpaceX 正式将星舰送入地球轨道,开始绕地球转圈,同时将更大体积的 Starlink V3 星链卫星,部署到太空。 根据官方设计,一台星舰,能携带最多 60 颗该卫星,其星链网络容量,相当于 20 次现有猎鹰 9 号发射,没有任何对手。 x.com/SawyerMerritt/… https://twitter.com/_FORAB/status/2104596530800074893
👍4💩1
琢磨先生: 哎呦卧槽!!! 今天有警官普法称,使用VPN要注意用正规的,不然有黄色小广告!!! 警察没说不让用VPN,历史第一次!!! 评论区网友纷纷留言,求推荐合法的VPN!😄 https://twitter.com/Cuichenghao777/status/2104567879400317124
🤡1
潘石屹谈为何留在美国 一段几十秒的视频炸网 交流讨论加电报人群: @three001
#今日焦点 2026.9.28-1 ● 媒体人追问20年前车祸,忻州市长上任88天辞职 ● 中国的留美博士生枪杀华人导师本周竟然被判无罪 ● 一个开新款奔驰S的车主跳河 ● 潘石屹透露不能回中国原因,以及任志强被抓的内幕
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,139 posts we hold for @times001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@chinabbs · 2,08719 posts2021河南洪灾资料存档
@herlanflooddoc · 379 posts中国产新冠疫苗副作用记录
@cnvac · 5156 posts不能不明白
@baoxinzhe · 235 posts>>>华人文化研究所<<<_tag支那屠支芝麻共和改良反共
@chinesebadcultual · 1524 postshistory record
@historyrecord · 14 posts我的收藏
@wodeshoucang · 1223 posts中国纪录片
@chinesedocumentary · 4,8972 posts士兵突击
@hisbs666 · 32 postschinalie
@ChinaLiesReport · 11 post中国高校新闻
@chineseuniversitynews1 · 1141 post拉清单channel
@laqingdan2021 · 5991 post情况发生变化
@status_is_changing · 2011 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@zaihuapd · 283,183#1
@tnews365 · 164,549#2
@XueXi_China · 87,102#3
@newszg_official · 161,730#4
@DNSPODT · 72,064#5
@CE_Observe · 75,036#6
@woshadiao · 115,194#7
@solidot · 47,568#8
@liangjiahepost · 18,428#9
@fucku_idiot · 40,459#10
@xhsyp · 31,479#11
@titan_pain · 20,773#12
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585#13
@acgdaily · 16,665#14
@shixun160 · 22,955#15
@mightyflame · 26,081#16
@cdtchinesefeed · 44,158#17
@endofxi · 21,592#18
@iyouport · 27,814#19
@wxbyg · 19,469#20
@dododolidadada · 9,807#21
@personal_hub · 11,556#22
@pelosi3 · 71,125#23
@fangshimin · 16,154#24
@FinanceNewsDaily · 57,803#25
@juexinggonglue · 16,151#26
@xintiandi9 · 10,382#27
@moyu2023 · 8,814#28
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,563#29
@douban_read · 35,976#30
@weibo_read · 19,367#31
@Mandark_5678 · 4,810#32
@VoiceofPooh · 22,536#33
@luojisw001 · 3,745#34
@CN_Privacy · 16,727#35
@appdopic · 16,346#36
@tg_InternetSecurity · 10,639#37
@NFSCHimalayaNews · 9,457#38
@dogdairy · 14,052#39
@baguabox · 33,433#40
@dragonsden2k · 2,486#41
@Ruters0615 · 25,532#42
@jike_collection · 35,824#43
@xhqcankao · 163,238#44
@wearemjj · 9,587#45
@GodlyNews1 · 69,298#46
@cnbeta_com · 27,529#47
@Financial_Express · 36,931#48
@illusory_world · 10,974#49
@lychee_wood · 17,730#50
@chinaupdate · 6,276#51
@telonews_cn · 83,174#52
@landiansub · 45,199#53
@zhujiwiki_info · 10,674#54
@pingrangTV · 29,208#55
@vps_xhq · 49,725#56
@LetITFlyW · 9,586#57
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,385#58
@qunyouwen · 89,267#59
@voachinese · 34,696#60
@SIM_CN · 10,075#61
@JISFW · 12,770#62
@Hearse_Drifting · 10,576#63
@jandan_pic · 25,263#64
@abskoop · 306,126#65
@text1024 · 19,743#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@shixun160 · 22,955
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
@endofxi · 21,592
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
@TwtVideoOfChina · 75,397
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
@VoiceofPooh · 22,536
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@Ruters0615 · 25,532
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
@newszg_official · 161,730
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
@aimeinv88 · 23,415
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 18 September 2026
@mightyflame · 26,081
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 13 September 2026
@cdtchinesefeed · 44,158
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
@pelosi3 · 71,125
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
@XueXi_China · 87,102
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,455
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@JShangrong · 24,735
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
@zaobaosg · 36,506
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
@baguabox · 33,433
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 4 September 2026
@freechinese · 27,572
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@iyouport · 27,814
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@rthk_new_c · 49,497
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
@OutsightChina · 41,309
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
@readingclubus · 29,128
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 8 September 2026
@nowtv_news · 42,715
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@FinanceNewsDaily · 57,803
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@voachinese · 34,696
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“电报时报” (@times001), 84,754 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/times001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.