Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FREE 中文

Channel

FREE 中文

@freechinese

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,572subscribers

+209 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001570215033
TypeChannel
Username@freechinese
Description世界与你同步
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/freechinese

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

27,29827,57227,4357 August 2026 — 27,363 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,365 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,349 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,305 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,300 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,313 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,304 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,298 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,320 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,313 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,322 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,341 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,346 subscribers21 August 2026 — 27,356 subscribers23 August 2026 — 27,374 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,381 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,390 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,389 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,404 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,431 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,437 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,440 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,454 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,457 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,458 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,474 subscribers6 September 2026 — 27,512 subscribers9 September 2026 — 27,522 subscribers11 September 2026 — 27,509 subscribers13 September 2026 — 27,522 subscribers15 September 2026 — 27,546 subscribers17 September 2026 — 27,572 subscribers19 September 2026 — 27,568 subscribers26 September 2026 — 27,572 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +209. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,257–27,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 18:3727,572+4
19 Sept 2026, 17:1527,568-4
17 Sept 2026, 07:1527,572+26
15 Sept 2026, 05:5527,546+24
13 Sept 2026, 15:2027,522+13
11 Sept 2026, 19:3727,509-13
9 Sept 2026, 11:3527,522+10
6 Sept 2026, 07:1627,512+38
4 Sept 2026, 01:2227,474+16
2 Sept 2026, 13:4727,458+1
1 Sept 2026, 15:4327,457+3
31 Aug 2026, 19:1627,454+14
30 Aug 2026, 20:3427,440+3
29 Aug 2026, 23:3527,437+6
29 Aug 2026, 02:4927,431+27
28 Aug 2026, 00:4727,404+15
26 Aug 2026, 21:2427,389-1
25 Aug 2026, 22:2427,390+9
24 Aug 2026, 20:2727,381+7
23 Aug 2026, 05:2727,374first reading

Engagement

816 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.24%
avg views ÷ 27,572 subscribers
Avg views / post
617
251 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
251
of 816 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 198 of 251 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held816 (6 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total154,971
Reactions total1,468
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 00:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈17,200
Videos
≈8,610
Links
≈1,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 39m
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 308 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,661 reactions across 653 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍84014.8%
💩82914.6%
😁72012.7%
🤣67511.9%
❤3936.94%
🤡3285.79%
🤮2594.58%
🥰2464.35%
🙏2424.27%
👎1632.88%
👏1592.81%
😭1252.21%
🤪1091.93%
🍌1051.85%
😱941.66%
🍾831.47%
🫡500.883%
😨250.442%
🤬250.442%
🖕210.371%
26 further kinds1703.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 671 of the 816 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,661 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 816 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 16:11 UTC976 views17 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

四卡三待手机诞生 网传华为 Mate 90 Pro Max 支持双实体 SIM + 双 eSIM,可同时在线三张卡,即四卡三待。

😱7💩5👍2🆒2🤮1

29 Sept 2026, 14:28 UTC882 views2 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

日本留学生非常喜欢小米手机

👍1💩1

29 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC856 views16 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

一名中国女孩去阿姆斯特丹旅行时,乘坐电车途中忘了拿自己的包,包里有钱包、手机和护照。眼看电车渐渐远去,她顿时惊慌失措。 她和朋友在车站等候,每来一辆电车,就向司机和乘客打听包的下落。后来,她们遇到一位热心人,对方帮她找回了包里的所有物品。 这时,女孩像孩子一样哭了起来,那位男士则像安慰女儿般安慰她。

❤9👍4🍌2👏1

29 Sept 2026, 14:13 UTC870 views20 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

日本士兵小野田宽郎在菲律宾丛林中坚持作战 29 年,因为他不相信第二次世界大战已经结束。 直到 1974 年,他昔日的上级亲自飞到当地,正式解除他的任务,他才投降。 BBC:https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/world-61257566 维基百科:https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/小野田寬郎

😁8🕊5🤡4👍2🫡1

29 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC822 viewsread 30 September 2026
Video

美国移民执法突击行动在塔拉哈西一家热门墨西哥卷饼店外展开时,餐车工作人员纷纷躲避美国移民与海关执法局(ICE)人员。 监控录像显示,几名员工在三名员工被拘留并带走前,曾试图逃离执法人员。据当地媒体报道,这些员工来自危地马拉。 这场行动的后续影响正波及这家餐馆。Chile & Chili’s Taqueria 已永久关闭其位于田纳西街的店面。店主表示,突击行动后还有其他员工辞职。

29 Sept 2026, 13:21 UTC928 views27 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

袁腾飞当上美帝的爹了

👍13🤣6😁6🥰2

29 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC898 views5 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

突发:俄罗斯空天军又损失一架重要的图波列夫 Tu-95MS 核能力战略轰炸机。飞机在阿穆尔州坠毁,机上 7 名机组人员中有 6 人丧生。事故发生时,飞机正处于着陆最后进近阶段。

👍5

29 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,020 views14 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

重大新闻:美军将在明天前撤出伊拉克,结束长达 20 多年的驻军。期间共有 4,500 名美国人丧生。 伊朗支持的组织称此举是“历史性胜利”,也是“美国计划遭受的惨败”。 伊拉克安全官员警告称,此次撤军为时过早。 最后一名在伊拉克阵亡的美军士兵于 7 月在埃尔比勒附近的一起无人机爆炸事件中身亡。 今年伊朗战争中阵亡的 18 名美军人员里,有 7 人死在伊拉克。

🍾9🙏3🤣2

29 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,040 views33 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

北理工取消裴轶研究生导师资格 依据相关规定,经研究决定,取消裴轶研究生指导教师资格,撤销其北京理工大学教师岗位任职资格,解除聘用关系。

👏21😁5🤣4🤷‍♂2❤1

29 Sept 2026, 10:38 UTC932 views16 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

中国高层罕见连续两天会见日方人士 要求纠正涉台言论 中国外交部长王毅28日在北京与访华的日本前外相岩屋毅会谈,国务院副总理何立峰29日也与岩屋举行了会谈。自日本首相高市早苗去年11月的涉台国会答辩导致双边关系恶化以来,这是中国高层首次与日本国会议员会谈,连续两天安排会见实属罕见。王毅强调,“紧迫的是(日方)尽快纠正本国领导人在台湾问题上的错误言行”。 据分析,习近平领导层礼遇重视日中关系的日本政界人士及经济界领袖,意在促使高市政府改变对华态度。 岩屋作为致力于推动对华经贸交流的日本国际贸易促进协会(国贸促)会长率团访华。会谈时国贸促的成员也在座。王毅和何立峰均为中共中央政治局委员,目前政治局共有21人。 据中国外交部称,王毅在会谈中就日中关系指出“有待再次实现正常化”。 国贸促前会长是今年6月去世的前众院议长河野洋平。王毅高度评价河野“敢于直面日本过去的黑暗历史,勇于反省军国主义的侵略罪责”。王毅还指出,今年是远东国际…

🤡7👍3👎3❤1🤣1🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 816 posts we hold for @freechinese. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@freechinese edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

在花🎗️科技圈
@zaihuapd · 283,183
#1
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 163,238
#2
竹新社
@tnews365 · 164,549
#3
Yummy 😋
@GodlyNews1 · 69,298
#4
LoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 72,064
#5
每日消费电子观察
@CE_Observe · 75,036
#6
Newlearnerの自留地
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,563
#7
cnBeta.COM中文业界资讯站 - 总频道(精选新闻)
@cnbeta_com · 27,529
#8
小声逼逼
@me888888888888 · 50,818
#9
即刻精选
@jike_collection · 35,824
#10
Solidot
@solidot · 47,568
#11
IT之家 (全文)
@ithome_full · 2,724
#12
敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 71,125
#13
科技&趣闻&杂记
@kejiqu · 36,473
#14
APPDO的互联网记忆
@appdopic · 16,346
#15
简中互联网废物大赏
@fucku_idiot · 40,459
#16
VPS信号旗播报
@vps_xhq · 49,725
#17
不存在的世界
@illusory_world · 10,974
#18
【华尔街见闻】- 财经时讯 | AI 实时互动
@FinanceNewsDaily · 57,803
#19
看鉴中国 OutsightChina
@OutsightChina · 41,309
#20
APPDO 数字生活指南
@AppDoDo · 40,725
#21
2.5次元日常 🍉
@acgdaily · 16,665
#22
少数派sspai
@sspai · 38,286
#23
心灵魔法站
@personal_hub · 11,556
#24
Alan的小纸箱
@alansbox · 4,569
#25
极客分享
@geekshare · 64,804
#26
大河马中文财经新闻分享
@chinesecaixin · 7,263
#27
 Apple Nuts
@AppleNuts · 37,006
#28
电报时报
@times001 · 84,754
#29
学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 87,102
#30
某科学的一个频道
@titan_pain · 20,773
#31
中国数字时代
@cdtchinesefeed · 44,158
#32
天眼
@yelloworblueHK · 17,057
#33
Readhub
@readhub_cn · 8,475
#34
知乎暴论
@mightyflame · 26,081
#35
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585
#36
Global Macro View
@Marcoview666 · 5,372
#37
蓝点网订阅频道
@landiansub · 45,199
#38
v2ex
@v2ex_notice · 861
#39
不周的生活观察
@buzhouxiansheng · 6,916
#40
层叠 - The Cascading
@outvivid · 9,060
#41
zrj766的频道
@zrj96 · 17,202
#42
如何与沙雕相处
@ruheyushadiaoxiangchu · 28,742
#43
平壤卫视
@pingrangTV · 29,208
#44
Karen医生の日常
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,385
#45
AI Copilot
@AI_Copilot_Channel · 10,770
#46
NodeSeek官方频道
@nodeseekc · 36,870
#47
ahhhhfs|A姐分享
@abskoop · 306,126
#48
〄FW
@JISFW · 12,770
#49
Surge & Loon & QX 脚本收集
@NobyDa · 63,570
#50
PlayStation 新闻转发
@PlayStationNewssss · 3,161
#51
iBeta 尝鲜派|公告栏
@ibeta_channel · 13,573
#52
Appinn Feed|小众软件
@appinnfeed · 33,556
#53
折腾啥
@zhetengsha · 49,675
#54
Project X Channel
@projectXtls · 29,942
#55

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 71,125
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
轻口味时间
@lightrekt · 49,090
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 25 August 2026
影音中国(中国被禁的视频)
@TwtVideoOfChina · 75,397
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
俄罗斯资讯参考频道
@JShangrong · 24,735
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FREE 中文” (@freechinese), 27,572 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freechinese.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.