Channel
@Financial_Express
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,169subscribers
+214 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001375475051 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Financial_Express |
| Description | 附属群组 @Financial_Express_Chat 财经慢报是 TG 简中最大的泛财经类资讯新闻频道，实时覆盖大宗外汇全球股票区块链等市场，内容真实中立客观。 部分内容按原文摘自墙内财经媒体并附来源，不代表本频道立场，请客观谨慎看待相关内容，谨防钓鱼误导。部分刷屏内容为现场零延迟文字转录，推送频繁敬请谅解。 |
| Created | 2 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Financial_Express |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 37,169 | +30 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 37,139 | +36 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 37,103 | +43 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 37,060 | +67 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 36,993 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 36,990 | +24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 36,966 | +11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 36,955 | first reading |
340 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 340 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 340 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,539 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 340 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 340 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Cerebras 第二季财报喜忧参半，股价盘后跌 17% 金十数据 8 月 13 日讯，AI 芯片制造商 Cerebras 第二季度营收录得 2.1 亿美元，同比增长 103%；其中云业务收入达到 1.26 亿美元，同比增长近 4 倍，但硬件销售额同比下滑 23%，至 5410 万美元；本季录得净亏损 4.505 亿美元，而上年同期实现净利润 3.095 亿美元。公司上调了全年业绩指引，目前预计核心营收将在 8.80 亿至 8.90 亿美元之间，高于此前 8.55 亿至 8.65 亿美元的预期区间。这份报告给投资者带来了喜忧参半的局面，自 5 月份 IPO 以来，Cerebras 的股价已上涨了 42%。该公司最初定位为人工智能芯片领域英伟达的挑战者，但如今其最大的收入来源却是云计算。Cerebras 表示，本季度核心毛利率将扩大至 38%至 40%，以回应投资者的担忧。财报公布后，Cerebras 股价盘后一度跌逾 17%。
思科首席执行官在电话会议上表示，未来六个月，公司有望拿下多项 AI 设计订单，覆盖 G300、G200、P200 Silicon One 芯片及光模块产品。
美国国务院批评以色列国防部长卡茨，表示以色列在黎巴嫩南部的军事部署违背相关协议；而卡茨称以色列国防军将在安全区保持长期驻军。
伊朗方面称，有报告显示格什姆岛附近出现石油污染，将此事归咎于一艘外籍油轮，要求就波斯湾的环境破坏追究责任。
标普全球扩大与微软(MSFT.O)合作，将丰富的关键智能数据引入微软 365 Copilot。
据 Axios：美国国务院高级官员表示，美国敦促各方遵守框架协议。以色列已明确无意占领黎巴嫩领土，长期驻军黎南不符合协议承诺，也不利于两国长期和平与安全。
据 Axios：特朗普政府批评以色列国防部长卡茨有关继续占领黎巴嫩南部的言论，并表示相关表态违背了以色列政府与美国及黎巴嫩签署协议中的承诺。
美国经济顾问委员会主席：CPI 报告削弱了加息的理由。
美国最高法院目前暂停苹果应用商店费率相关诉讼程序。
特朗普的总统直升机海军陆战队一号与商业航班近距离接近事件发生后，美国联邦航空管理局计划修复里根国家机场的通信系统。
伊朗官方驳斥特朗普有关美国完全掌控霍尔木兹海峡的说法。
美国能源部：将不再推进此前于 2024 年 12 月选定进入审查程序的三个拟议“国家利益电力输电走廊”的指定工作。
Showing the 12 most recent of 340 posts we hold for @Financial_Express. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 82,623 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“财经慢报” (@Financial_Express), 37,169 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Financial_Express.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.