Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Leslie和朋友们

@justgoidea

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

325subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001515089840
TypeChannel
Username@justgoidea
Description因一念有无数生灭而仿佛无处可逃。由是,心无放逸,不失众善。
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/justgoidea

Growth

3257 Aug 2026, 16:48 — 325 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:19 — 325 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:488 Aug 2026, 07:19
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 324–326 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:19325no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:48325first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 325 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,018
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
486
Videos
51
Links
1,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏323.1%
🤮323.1%
215.4%
👍215.4%
😢215.4%
🥰17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC36 viewsread 8 August 2026

📝 只是忘了 从药山惟俨「我有一句子,未曾向人说」与陶渊明「欲辨已忘言」写起,思考参禅中对答案、境界与所得的追逐,以及「亡」与「忘」之间的细微差别。 https://justgoidea.com/zhi-shi-wang-le/

Signed RSSbot

7 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SteamVents

亡母二十周年祭 今年三月,我带家人回国了两个月,先飞回天津,然后从北到南去了保定、大连、杭州、安吉、广州、深圳、珠海。在大连见了一个高中老友,老友和她母亲曾有很长一段时间居住在我母亲家中,她们非常亲近,在最后的两年中,老友和我母亲的相处时间甚至比我这个儿子都长得多。 饭桌上,偶尔谈起我母亲,老友也潸然泪下,还说了一些我并不知道的事情。例如我母亲买衣服经常是在一家店里一次性买很多等等。这些琐事我完全不知道,初听诧异,但是想了想,确实符合她的性格。 (这次回家后,我收拾了老照片,全部带回加拿大。图上的那只大狗,曾在我家住过三天,她的儿子——一只可爱的小黑狗——也在我家和我生活过一个月。) 高中毕业到现在20年来,我一直不太敢联系这个老朋友,就是因为只要想起她,我就想起母亲,就会让太多记忆碎片在心中激荡,像一股妖风卷起了玻璃碎片,像开车撞向一堵墙,像一个武林高手死于冒蓝火的加特林。在我的记忆和情感里,老友和我母亲几乎是不可分割

7 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC41 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

关心也好,不关心也好,有一个时间点需要牢记,明年秋天。 去年、今年、接下来的所有的图穷匕见、冷灶闲棋也都是为了那时。 历史是个循环,可以想一想、查一查2016年前后、2021年前后,或者再早一些。 说起来极其操蛋,神仙打架,遭殃的到底是凡人。

😢2

2 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC86 viewsread 8 August 2026

# 202617:在一念成为标准答案之前 从标准答案塑造的计分法,谈善恶、因果与空性如何落在当下一念,并以「专注、清明、绵密」整理与 AI Agent 协作的具体方法。 👉 https://letter.justgoidea.com/p/202617?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=newsletter

Signed RSSbot

31 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC78 viewsread 8 August 2026

哦吼,社交媒体上那么多吃这碗饭的人危险了。不过好多人这些年昧良心的钱也赚了不少,例如欧盟多国的D类签证敢报价几万人民币。

31 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC68 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tnews365

《国务院关于出境入境管理的规定》自9月15日起施行,对出入境中介服务机构实施备案管理。 禁止境外机构在境内提供出入境中介服务。 对准备前往“风险等级为最高级别”或“严重危及人身安全案件突发高发”的国家地区者,边检可劝阻其前往。 违反出口管制、技术进出口管理等规定,可能危害国家产业安全、技术安全的,可以决定不准其出境。 骗取出境入境证件、非法出境入境受到行政拘留处罚的,在境外违法犯罪、危害国家安全利益的,可以不准出境6个月~3年。 不准出境的决定,若有可能影响国家安全、刑事案件侦查等情形的,可以不告知当事人。 为他人申请出境、入境停留居留出具虚假邀请函等材料的,个人罚款5000~1万元,单位罚款1~5万元,并没收违法所得。 个人从事出入境中介服务的,没收违法所得,可以并处5000元以下罚款。 (中国政府网)

30 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC85 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

第一次做韩式年糕,味道不错。就是水放得多了点,收完汁还是很多,不过可以拿来拌饭。 做法超级简单:锅里放入韩式辣酱、辣椒粉,一小勺酱油、半勺老抽,一勺糖,然后加适量的水煮开。煮的过程中要把辣酱搅拌开。然后放入年糕煮。煮的差不多了,放入想要的辅菜,比如玉米、包菜丝啊什么的。收汁前放一些奶酪即可。

1

24 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC128 viewsread 8 August 2026

这种肉末酱的做法并不健康,只适合偶尔吃一下。

24 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC119 viewsread 8 August 2026

午饭就是用的这个肉末酱拌的米粉。 这次没买到江西米粉,用的是温州粉干。要么是我泡水的时间不够,要么是它就不适合用来做拌粉。总之没有江西米粉的感觉对。

24 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC118 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

做肉末酱,步骤超级简单。肉末放锅里,加冷油,然后先用大火快速炒变色,之后转小火加入蒜末、姜末,炒匀后再加老抽、生抽、郫县豆瓣酱、黄豆酱,翻炒,然后放入香菇丁,加水,没过肉末即可。闷一下后再加蚝油和糖,快速大火收汁。

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @justgoidea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 415,202 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Leslie和朋友们” (@justgoidea), 325 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justgoidea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.