Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 河鱼的话

Channel

河鱼的话

@gibberish0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001397293992
TypeChannel
Username@gibberish0
Description我需要一个说废话的地方
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/gibberish0

Growth

177 August 2026 — 17 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 20:4617no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:1317first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 17 subscribers
Avg views / post
5.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held20 (16 May 202523 July 2026)
Views total5
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
237
Videos
11
Links
190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 16:10 UTC5 viewsread 11 August 2026

“一切都会过去。忧患,痛苦,血,饥饿,瘟疫。当我们的身体和事业在大地上影踪全无的时候,剑将消失,而这些星星将留下来。没有一个人不知道这一点。那么为什么我们不愿意把自己的目光投向星星?为什么?”

5 Jun 2026, 07:54 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026

劳动力、原材料、商品市场都不是免费的,不以转移支付的形式给,就要以关税和军费的形式给。

25 May 2026, 09:13 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

“例如,有一篇材料原题是《天津市东郊区詹庄子乡民生、民强农业生产合作社如何发动妇女参加田间生产》,共33个字,毛泽东改为《妇女走上了劳动战线》。”

14 Mar 2026, 18:43 UTC36 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @tnews365

哲学家哈贝马斯3月14日在德国斯塔恩贝格去世,享年96岁。 哈贝马斯1929年生,是西方马克思主义法兰克福学派代表人物,著有《公共领域的结构转型》《交往行为理论》《认识与关切》《现代性的哲学话语》《晚期资本主义的合法化危机》《在事实与规范之间:关于法律和民主法治国的商谈理论》等。 (美联社,路透社)

25 Feb 2026, 12:21 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @russia_literature

期盼了很久的节日过去了。明天又是平常的日子,又要出去干活了…… Давно ожидаемый праздник прошел. Завтра опять будни, опять на работу... 陀思妥耶夫斯基《死屋手记》 娄自良丨译 source

4 Feb 2026, 09:09 UTC38 viewsread 11 August 2026

“二元对立和粗暴归因这两个论证方法可以随意论证出任何你想要的结论,比如说我们把世界上的国家分为是否用原子弹轰炸日本,那么没有用原子弹轰炸日本的国家成为发达国家的概率是19.7%,而用原子弹轰炸日本成为发达国家的概率是100%,所以一个国家想成为发达国家最好的办法不是投资科技/教育/基建,而是用原子弹轰炸日本。”

16 Dec 2025, 15:31 UTC39 viewsread 11 August 2026

(从托洛茨基对十月革命的回忆中理解的)解散立宪会议的逻辑是:世界上是有正确和错误的,但是宏大的、模糊的、不可执行的;可执行的代议制形式需要反映这种正误,这种正误为任何代议制形式赋予最终的合法性——而不是由代议制形式来判定什么是正确和错误。 人们预期某种代议制形式能反映现实,所以展开实践,发现实践结果不能反映现实世界的正误,于是放弃这种代议制形式。对特定形式的预期和实践间隔越久、或实施后保持停滞的时间越久,这些委员会、议会和代表会议越不能反映现实,在社会激烈动荡的时代尤其如此。 因此,民主——在现代已几乎成为代议制的同义词——只是一个工具,好用就用,不好用就不用。

3 Nov 2025, 14:02 UTC35 viewsread 11 August 2026

“我们说的封建主义,是指什么呢?严格地说,用这个名词并不正确。某些中国和外国的学者,煞费苦心地想说明中国不存在封建主义,因为没有农奴制,也就是说,人们可以自由出卖劳动力。不错,中国多年前就在形式上废除了这种封建制度,而且,西方势力的侵入也破坏了中央集权封建社会自给自足的自然经济,使社会生活的很大一部分受贷币经济的支配,不过,正如我们所了解的,这并没有多少进步的效果。如果用这种观点看待中国问题,未免过于迂腐,这是全然不顾封建残余在中国人的生活、思想、风俗、习惯、情感中还有极大影响。中国废除农奴制的时候,并没有废除地主摊派劳役、监禁债户以及决定佃农生死的种种权力,也没有完全废除蓄奴、买卖少女、纳妾、包办婚姻等等陋俗。这一切都是地主豪绅统治的必然产物。 在中国,地主的权力并不处处相同。沿海和长江流域的省份是外国资本渗入的地方,市镇工商业比较发达,乡绅的权力往往为城市商人所分享。而在西部和北部的省份里,由于资本主义前的特色很浓,地主的

17 Sept 2025, 06:50 UTC36 viewsread 11 August 2026

“在爱尔兰,如果对农民说他的农庄有20英亩,这个数字对他们毫无意义。因为他们不知道这20英亩是好地还是差地。在讲自己的农庄时,他们说我这个农庄是‘两头牛的农庄’,就是说我这个农庄能够养两头奶牛。如果地很好,草长得很旺盛,两头牛的农庄就会比较小;如果地不好,草长得不旺盛,两头牛的农庄就会比较大。 所以你说一个10英亩的农庄,对农夫来说毫无意义。就像说一个学者写了10公斤的书,对学者来说也毫无意义,不知道是好书还是坏书。”

4 Sept 2025, 16:48 UTC36 viewsread 11 August 2026

两个老头见面 甲:你这个年龄气色不错啊 乙:以前人到七十古来稀,现在有人说70岁还只是个孩子 甲:生物技术发展,人类的器官可以不断移植,越活越年轻,甚至长生不老 乙:可能本世纪人就可以活到150岁 路透社:Hot mic picks up Putin and Xi discussing organ transplants and immortality

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gibberish0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“河鱼的话” (@gibberish0), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gibberish0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.