后续:工作人员联系说系统风控,只能升级企业版或者退款 博主说已经投诉至市场监管局。
👍54

Channel
@appdopic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,538subscribers
+179 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001728616195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @appdopic |
| Description | 本频道由多人编辑发布,不代表任何个人观点; 📨欢迎投稿/商务合作:@appdo_bot 购买ADs:telega.io/c/appdopic 关于APPDO:about.appdo.xyz |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/appdopic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 15,538 | +227 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 15,311 | +13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 15,298 | +14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 15,284 | -35 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 15,319 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 15,330 | -18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 15,348 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 15,359 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 131,970 |
| Reactions total | 1,623 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,488 reactions across 47 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 495 | 33.3% | |
| 🤣 | 438 | 29.4% | |
| 👍 | 187 | 12.6% | |
| 😱 | 75 | 5.04% | |
| 🍾 | 39 | 2.62% | |
| 🤬 | 38 | 2.55% | |
| 👀 | 37 | 2.49% | |
| 💯 | 37 | 2.49% | |
| 🎉 | 33 | 2.22% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 1.68% | |
| 🥴 | 22 | 1.48% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 1.01% | |
| 🤷♂ | 11 | 0.739% | |
| 😨 | 9 | 0.605% | |
| 👻 | 6 | 0.403% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 0.336% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 0.269% | |
| 🎃 | 3 | 0.202% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.202% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.134% | |
| 3 further kinds | 4 | 0.269% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,623reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @appdopic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
后续:工作人员联系说系统风控,只能升级企业版或者退款 博主说已经投诉至市场监管局。
👍54
alo 天猫官方旗舰店正式开业 仅1分钟成交破1000万 最大的竞争对手为lululemon 📢 频道 @appdopic
👍1
123 网盘:让你买,也没想到你能用这么多啊😁 📢 频道 @appdopic
😁43🥴3
你们怎么凌晨四点还在看奥德赛😭
🤣26😁4
有用户发现:AI 中转站除了掺水,还能投毒 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/ZTURnsPiUeOUEGHJDic68g 📢 频道 @appdopic
😁16👍4
离岸人民币/在岸人民币对美元汇率创2023年2月以来新高 📢 频道 @appdopic
❤3
大家都知道,现在国行安卓手机都有个「海外流量」的功能,通常在系统设置里,对吧? 以eSIM的方式下发一张海外电话卡,让你在出国时候使用。很方便,对吧? 大家也知道,三星这个ZFold8是一个实体卡:卡槽+一个eSIM卡槽的配置,对吧? 所以,你一定会想,那我的实体卡槽就插着国内的实体SIM卡,然后「海外流量」的虚拟卡就发到那个eSIM卡槽里,都是最好的安排,对吧? 不对!最后这条不对! 你用三星手机的海外流量套餐,那个eSIM卡不是下发到闲置的eSIM卡槽里的!是要禁用你的实体SIM卡,然后写入一张eSIM卡的! 挖打发?令人耳目一新的设计。越想越精彩。 还是那句老话,活到老,学到老啊。 Via flypig
🤬20🤣13👀2❤1😨1
iOS 27 Beta 5 发现国行 Apple Intelligence 过挖掘 iOS 27 Beta 5 更新代码,发现了苹果正在为国行 Apple Intelligence 做准备。 📢 频道 @appdopic
😁9❤1
阿里巴巴千问 App 推出专业会员服务, 阿里巴巴千问 App 昨晚面向专业用户推出付费方案,包括办公助理订阅会员与 AI 视频生成单独额度两套收费模式。即便没有开通付费会员,普通用户也可正常使用。 办公助理订阅会员最高价月付价 128 元 / 月; AI视频生成额度500 个额度售价 968 元,有效期三个月。 📢 频道 @appdopic
🤬6❤1
Claude Sonnet 5永久保留首发价 Anthropic 已经决定不再上涨 Claude Sonnet 5 的 API 价格,首发价就是目前长期价。 每百万输入 token 继续收 2 美元,输出 token 收 10 美元。原定 9 月 1 日涨到 3 美元和 15 美元的计划已经取消。 频道 @appdopic
😁25
APPDO的互联网记忆 pinned a photo
慢讯:国乒男单横滨团灭,日本张本兄妹双双夺冠 8月9日,WTT横滨冠军赛收官,张本智和、张本美和兄妹分别击败韩国选手吴晙诚和中国选手陈幸同,首次携手拿下男女单打冠军。 频道 @appdopic
👍47🎉23❤2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @appdopic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@appdopic edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 27,778 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“APPDO的互联网记忆” (@appdopic), 15,538 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/appdopic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.