Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for APPDO的互联网记忆

Channel

APPDO的互联网记忆

@appdopic

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,962subscribers

+1,603 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728616195
TypeChannel
Username@appdopic
Description本频道由多人编辑发布,不代表任何个人观点; 📨欢迎投稿/商务合作:@appdo_bot 购买ADs:telega.io/c/appdopic 关于APPDO:about.appdo.xyz
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/appdopic

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@QukanMovie/105398 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC@appdopic/3768 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@QukanMovie/1062813 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC@appdopic/3800 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@appdopic/3834 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC@QukanMovie/1074320 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@QukanMovie/124233 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC@appdopic/4298 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@QukanMovie/124816 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC@appdopic/4332 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@QukanMovie5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@QukanMovie (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 161 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,28416,96216,1236 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1,603. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,032–17,214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 10:1116,962+24
9 Nov 2026, 17:4416,938+23
8 Nov 2026, 10:1116,915+4
7 Nov 2026, 08:1616,911+18
6 Nov 2026, 08:2716,893+18
5 Nov 2026, 10:1916,875+5
4 Nov 2026, 10:0516,870+11
3 Nov 2026, 06:4716,859+13
2 Nov 2026, 08:2116,846+3
1 Nov 2026, 09:1816,843+6
31 Oct 2026, 11:1616,837+6
30 Oct 2026, 07:5516,831+12
29 Oct 2026, 10:1516,819+15
28 Oct 2026, 06:2116,804+8
27 Oct 2026, 04:3016,796+15
26 Oct 2026, 03:1016,781+9
25 Oct 2026, 02:2516,772+11
24 Oct 2026, 00:1616,761+26
22 Oct 2026, 22:0516,735+5
21 Oct 2026, 17:0816,730first reading

Engagement

296 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.00%
avg views ÷ 16,962 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.779%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
116
of 296 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 97 of 114 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held296 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total173,981
Reactions total1,164
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,260
Videos
≈180
Links
≈1,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 53s
Average length
3m 11s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,176 reactions across 246 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,70527.6%
🤣1,66026.9%
👍77312.5%
😱4236.85%
❤2654.29%
🤬2363.82%
🍾1181.91%
🥴921.49%
🙏901.46%
👀861.39%
🎉721.17%
😭711.15%
👻661.07%
😨661.07%
💯600.972%
🤩500.81%
👏480.777%
💔460.745%
🍌420.68%
🤷‍♂410.664%
7 further kinds1662.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 260 of the 296 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 296 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 291 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @appdopic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 296 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.676%
2 of 296 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,070
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,950
over 289 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 296 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 21 of 116 posts held from the last 30 days (18.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC529 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026

SpaceX 发布 Starlink Mini 2:可换电池最长用 4.5 小时,邀请预订 999 美元 11 月 10 日,据 The Verge 与 Interesting Engineering 报道,SpaceX 发布新一代便携卫星终端 Starlink Mini 2,最大变化是内置可拆卸电池,官方称单次充电最长可联网 4.5 小时。 新机搭载 71Wh 电池(约 490 克),可免工具拆装、支持热换备用电池,60W USB-C 充电;另升级 Wi-Fi 6 与 IP67 防尘防水,机身厚 23.1 毫米。预订仅面向受邀美国用户,999 美元套餐含硬件与一年 Roam Unlimited 服务(SpaceX 标价 2,100 美元),100 美元可退订金,预计 12 月中旬起发货;SpaceX 尚未公布单机售价与海外上市时间。 频道 @appdopic

11 Nov 2026, 11:10 UTC805 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026

AMD 第六代 EPYC 处理器上市,最高 256 核、微软 Azure 与甲骨文 OCI 率先采用 11 月 10 日,据 AMD 官方公告,第六代 AMD EPYC 服务器处理器(代号 Venice)正式全面上市,采用全新 Zen 6 架构,共 10 款,面向 AI 智能体与数据中心工作负载。 主要服务器厂商已开始出货搭载新处理器的系统,微软 Azure 与甲骨文云基础设施(OCI)将提供相关云实例,Meta 也在验证平台、准备大规模部署。 频道 @appdopic

🔥9👍1

11 Nov 2026, 08:13 UTC997 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Adobe MAX 2026 发布 AI 智能体,Photoshop 等应用可接 ChatGPT 与 Gemini 11 月 10 日,据 Adobe 在迈阿密 Adobe MAX 2026 大会上的官方发布,Adobe Creative Agent 将扩展至 Photoshop、Premiere、Illustrator、InDesign、After Effects 与 Frame.io 等 Creative Cloud 应用,可用一句话指令完成多步骤编辑任务;Firefly 则升级为 AI 创意工作室,接入 OpenAI、谷歌、字节跳动、Kling 等第三方模型。 Adobe 同时预览了本地 MCP 集成,Photoshop、Illustrator、Premiere 与 After Effects 将可被 ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini 等外部智能体直接调用、修改原生工程文件,预计 2027 年初进入私人测试;…

👍7

11 Nov 2026, 05:48 UTC≈1,450 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

兄弟们我也安装上GTA6了😁 频道 @appdopic

👍13😁7🥰3

11 Nov 2026, 05:13 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 11 November 2026

Anthropic 一次推出 4 款 Claude 办公功能,会议、白板与表格齐上线 11 月 10 日,据 TechCrunch、Engadget 等报道,Anthropic 在旧金山活动上推出 Claude 办公套件:Claude Meetings、Claude Whiteboards 与 Claude Sheets 进入测试版,原名 Dashboards 的 Claude Data 同日正式上线,另有可直接在 Claude 内运行第三方应用的互动连接器。 Meetings 可作为可见参与者加入 Google Meet 会议,边开会边起草计划、画时间线并回答会中提问,首批面向 Team 与 Enterprise 套餐;Whiteboards 为共享实时白板,可与 Claude 共同梳理计划并生成行动项;Sheets 可用一句话生成带多标签页、公式与下拉菜单的表格并导出 Excel,上线首日即带 Google Worksp…

11 Nov 2026, 02:12 UTC≈1,240 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026

DeepMind 用 AI 智能体 4 周完成 Signal 协议形式化验证,生成 600 万行以上证明代码 11 月 10 日,据 Google DeepMind 官方博客报道,DeepMind 发布多智能体形式化验证框架 AlphaProof Code,并用它对 Signal 加密协议的已编译代码完成了关键安全属性的机器核查证明。 验证对象为 Signal 参考实现 libsignal v0.105.4(含后量子 SPQR v1.6.0),覆盖一对一会话的 PQXDH 握手与 Triple Ratchet 密钥轮换。5 人团队用 4 周完成,由 Gemini Carbon 驱动的智能体生成 600 万行以上 Lean 证明代码;验证针对的是未经修改的 Rust 代码编译成的 AArch64 机器码,而非协议的抽象设计。DeepMind 称,这是首次用 AI 在这一深度形式化验证广泛部署的加密协议实现,相关验证材料已开源。…

👍9

11 Nov 2026, 02:07 UTC≈1,160 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

国行 iPhone eSIM 限制解锁 https://github.com/huamidev/GestaltX 频道 @appdopic

👍7

11 Nov 2026, 02:03 UTC≈1,120 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

APEC 段子一则 频道 @appdopic

🤣34🤬5😁3❤1

11 Nov 2026, 00:49 UTC≈1,210 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Anthropic 收紧 Claude 使用限制:中国控股的海外企业同样受限 Anthropic 新版《支持地区政策》将于 2026 年 11 月 12 日正式生效,进一步明确针对中国大陆等未受支持地区的服务限制。 根据官方政策,限制范围包括: ① 地理位置限制:身处中国大陆等未受支持地区的个人及企业人员,均不得使用 Claude 服务。 ② 企业注册地限制:在中国大陆注册或设有总部的企业,即使员工身处美国、日本等支持地区,同样受到限制。 ③ 股权与控制权限制:由未受支持地区的个人或实体直接、间接多数持股或控制的海外企业,也被纳入限制范围。 相关政策覆盖 Claude、Claude Code、Anthropic API 等服务。 Anthropic 早在 2025 年 9 月就已宣布针对未受支持地区控股企业的限制,此次新版政策进一步明确了适用范围。 值得关注的是,即使一家企业注册在美国、员工也全部位于美国,只要其…

😁17😱7👍4💯2🤣2

10 Nov 2026, 23:17 UTC≈1,160 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

OpenAI 开卖 200 美元 AI 游戏掌机,用 Codex 一句话生成 Game Boy 游戏 11 月 9 日,据 Technetbook、ForkLog 等多家媒体报道,OpenAI 与 ModRetro 推出 Chromatic: Codex Edition 掌机,售价 200 美元,通过 OpenAI 官方商店 Supply Co. 发售。 用户在 Codex 里用文字描述玩法与画面,ModRetro 插件即可在 GB Studio 中生成可编辑的游戏工程,编译后写入附带的可编程卡带游玩;机器本身也兼容原版 Game Boy 与 Game Boy Color 卡带,配 2.56 英寸 160×144 IPS 屏与透明外壳,附带 3 款预装游戏。 首批已售罄,官网显示预计 11 月 19 日补货,发售地区包括美国、加拿大、日本、英国与欧盟等地。该机 9 月 29 日在 OpenAI DevDay 上首次亮相,参…

👍10

10 Nov 2026, 18:13 UTC≈1,280 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

DEEPX 新一代 AI 芯片 DX-M2 获 CES 2027 创新奖,采用三星 2 纳米工艺 11 月 10 日,据韩联社报道,韩国神经网络处理器开发商 DEEPX 宣布,其新一代 AI 半导体 DX-M2 入选 CES 2027 创新奖人工智能类别。 DX-M2 采用三星电子 2 纳米代工工艺,面向机器人与工业设备的端侧生成式 AI 推理,可在本地运行大语言模型与视觉语言模型,无需依赖云端,功耗约 5 瓦。DEEPX 已于本月初完成流片,计划 2027 年第四季度启动初期量产,2028 年全面量产。 频道 @appdopic

❤3

10 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,450 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

微软游说特朗普政府叫停中国光模块进口禁令,在美在建 35 座数据中心 11 月 10 日,据路透社援引三名知情人士报道,微软一直在游说特朗普政府,叫停拟议中的中国光模块进口禁令。光模块是 AI 数据中心内连接服务器、路由器与交换机的关键部件,部分数据中心需要数百万个。 美国政府 8 月被曝计划禁止进口新型中国光模块,理由是担心北京借此窃取数据、植入恶意软件或中断服务。微软在美有 35 座数据中心在建、另有 134 座规划中,9 月已与白宫科技政策办公室及国家安全委员会官员会面,指出禁令将拖慢数据中心建设。 中国厂商占据全球光模块市场约三分之二,旭创科技与中际旭创主导供应,美国 Coherent 与 Lumentum 规模尚不足以替代。据摩根士丹利 10 月报告,美方正考虑仅禁 3.2Tbps 速率产品,该产品量产要到 2028 年。微软拒绝置评,白宫与 FCC 未立即回应。 频道 @appdopic

👍6🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 296 posts we hold for @appdopic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@appdopic edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

APPDO 数字生活指南
@AppDoDo · 40,980
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
Appinn Feed|小众软件
@appinnfeed · 34,958
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 4 September 2026
知乎暴论
@mightyflame · 25,397
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 13 September 2026
蓝点网订阅频道
@landiansub · 47,142
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
科技&趣闻&杂记
@kejiqu · 36,774
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 1 September 2026
观水谭 A股市日记 🅥
@Guanshuitan · 33,890
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 October 2026
FREE 中文
@freechinese · 27,756
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
竹新社
@tnews365 · 167,192
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
即刻精选
@jike_collection · 35,883
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 September 2026
Yummy 😋
@GodlyNews1 · 71,143
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 August 2026
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 200,273
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
少数派sspai
@sspai · 39,123
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
在花🎗️科技圈
@zaihuapd · 289,994
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 12 August 2026
ChatGPT / AI新闻聚合
@AI_News_CN · 23,317
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 22 September 2026
LoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 73,241
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
树洞🌳群友问❓有点意思🗳
@qunyouwen · 89,042
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 August 2026
Iyouport
@iyouport · 27,612
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
cnBeta.COM中文业界资讯站 - 总频道(精选新闻)
@cnbeta_com · 27,396
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
简中互联网废物大赏
@fucku_idiot · 41,768
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
看鉴中国 OutsightChina
@OutsightChina · 41,905
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
不靠谱的喵(>^ω^<) #CatGPT
@MlgmXyysd_bibilailai · 22,511
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 September 2026
Widget🏂软件工具资源分享
@WidgetChannel · 107,907
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 August 2026
敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 72,526
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
 Apple Nuts
@AppleNuts · 37,705
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“APPDO的互联网记忆” (@appdopic), 16,962 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/appdopic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.