Channel
@PingAnLuoJiaShan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
513subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001487684635 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PingAnLuoJiaShan |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PingAnLuoJiaShan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 513 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 516 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 516 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
126 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 60 | 47.6% | |
| 🕊 | 20 | 15.9% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 11.1% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 6.35% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 5.56% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.97% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 3.97% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.794% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2025 to 14 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
武汉大学取消公众进校预约制度 5 月 13 日，武汉大学正式取消社会公众进校预约制度。公众凭本人身份证即可从珞珈门、弘毅门步行入校，工作日和节假日均开放，2023 年 7 月以来的预约入校模式结束。校方表示，希望借此进一步服务社会、促进校园资源共享。在保障教学秩序不受影响的前提下，有序开放校园也被视为公立高校的责任，并有助于减少高校与社会之间的隔阂。 澎湃新闻 🌸 在花频道 · 茶馆讨论 · 投稿通道
👎7💩5👍3
社论 | 风暴中心的武大人，该如何自持？ 近来，常有同学问我：“为什么网上总有人攻击武大，甚至连大一新生也不放过？”我不知如何安慰，只能实话实说：你并不孤单，我同样也愤懑不平，我们的背后是千千万万感同身受的武大人。眼下的这份压力，我们共担。 很不幸，我们被卷入了一场无差别的网络风暴；不幸中的万幸，吾道不孤。我们还有彼此，还有珞珈山上的一草一木，可以抚平心绪；还有东湖的阵阵柔波，能轻轻卷走忧愁。当你被那些虫蝇般的声音搅扰时，不妨回望这片土地本身——奥操、老图、行政楼乃至东湖、珞珈山。它们所见证的，远比一时一地的议论更悠长，也更坚硬。 我无意歌颂苦难。当讨论不再基于事实、不再尊重理性，甚至不再保留底线，沦为对一所大学及其师生的无差别抹黑时，它就不只是舆情这么简单，而早已堕化为一场流量的狂欢，一场无意识的集体暴力。太多声音被情绪裹挟，太多判断让位于发泄——很遗憾，在喧嚣之中，坚持理性的声音显得如此微弱。 有些事，外界或许可以不…
乐山时期，毫无疑问是武大校史上物质生活最艰苦的时期。“八宝饭”里掺杂砂石、稗谷和虫鼠屎，“大统舱”宿舍中阴暗、潮湿又拥挤，死亡渐成常态。因日寇轰炸、物价飞涨、贫病交加、积劳成疾而逝去的师生，竟达百人以上。德胜门外的武大公墓，被生者心酸地称为“第八宿舍”。 乐山时期，同时也是武大师生不畏苦难、弦歌不辍、克难奋进谋发展的时期。哲学系乐山籍学生萧萐父曾言，“物质生活条件的艰苦，好像并未影响当时师生的教学情绪和学习钻研精神；相反的，似乎国事的蜩螗、民族的苦难，反而激发起师生们内心深处的屈原式的忧患意识和费希特式的哲学热忱”。 1943年，英国科学史家李约瑟博士在访问乐山后，感叹“在四川嘉定，有人在可以遥望西藏山峰的一座宗祠里讨论原子核物理”，并向全世界昭示“武汉大学科研水平非常之高，甚至可与昆明西南联合大学媲美，这是毫无疑问的。”次年，美国地理学家葛德石博士考察了20多所中国内迁大学的办学情况，评估武汉大学为“A等大学”“中国最好的…
❤13💯3😁3
武汉大学原校长刘道玉逝世 中国共产党优秀党员，著名教育家、有机化学家，武汉大学原校长刘道玉同志，因病医治无效，于2025年11月7日15时33分在武汉逝世，享年92岁。 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/5wVfncG7J5As08e9Y3yByA
🕊20
https://www.threads.com/@czyczy918/post/DQeY712AAjh
😁4🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁5
武汉中院二审判决：驳回杨某媛上诉，维持原判 通 报 湖北省武汉经济技术开发区人民法院对杨某媛诉肖某瑫性骚扰损害责任纠纷一案，于2025年7月25日作出一审判决：驳回杨某媛的全部诉讼请求。杨某媛不服该判决，向本院提起上诉。 本院经不公开开庭审理后认为，一审判决认定事实清楚，适用法律正确，应予维持。本院于2025年9月17日作出二审判决：驳回上诉，维持原判。 特此通报。 湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 二〇二五年九月二十日 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XSXQNJndT7XHEBfGncRjIQ
🤡6😁5👍1
武大通报图书馆事件调查复核情况 省流： 1. 本着充分尊重司法判决的原则，结合调查复核情况，决定撤销肖某瑫记过处分。 2. 杨某媛硕士学位论文未发现学术不端行为，决定维持授予其硕士学位。 3. 给予多名管理人员党内警告等处分，暂停杨某媛导师招生资格两年。 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/ezLV4DO_Kkpcnf59Z3Poyg via 匿名
😁8
中山大学党委书记朱孔军上任不足一年，调任武汉大学党委书记，黄泰岩（1963年4月生）不再担任。中组部9月19日在武大宣布中央任命。 （微言教育）
😁2
朱孔军同志任武汉大学党委书记 日前，中央批准：朱孔军同志任武汉大学党委书记，不再担任中山大学党委书记职务；黄泰岩同志不再担任武汉大学党委书记职务。 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/QenmrODtYNdJY17dXOy9ag
😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁7🤡2
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PingAnLuoJiaShan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 536,994 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PingAnLuoJiaShan named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“平安珞珈山” (@PingAnLuoJiaShan), 513 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PingAnLuoJiaShan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.