Channel
@cyber_confessional
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39,396subscribers
+73 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001982885527 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyber_confessional |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyber_confessional |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 39,396 | +14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 39,382 | +15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 39,367 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:10 | 39,357 | +24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 39,333 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 39,322 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 39,324 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 39,323 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (8 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 129,264 |
| Reactions total | 769 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,014 reactions across 26 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🖕 | 246 | 24.3% | |
| ❤ | 153 | 15.1% | |
| 🤣 | 144 | 14.2% | |
| 🤯 | 126 | 12.4% | |
| 👎 | 100 | 9.86% | |
| 👍 | 56 | 5.52% | |
| 😨 | 55 | 5.42% | |
| 🗿 | 37 | 3.65% | |
| 🕊 | 25 | 2.47% | |
| 🤬 | 15 | 1.48% | |
| 🐳 | 12 | 1.18% | |
| 🤨 | 12 | 1.18% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 1.08% | |
| 🌚 | 10 | 0.986% | |
| 💔 | 10 | 0.986% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.099% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.099% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,014reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
楼主去年高中毕业，军训完之后就开始上课了，当时感觉大学很有意思，但到了今年1月才感觉大学很多新鲜东西都体验过了，感觉没意思就在寒假的时候开始学日语，一直学到了现在，但除了日语还想学点其它的比如吉他哲学古文韩语画画，因为感觉再过几年没有时间学这些东西了，但感觉时间真的很短，还浪费了一个学期，在想如果以后毕业了起码还能在网上给那些日韩生肉视频翻译一下，虽然没几个人看但感觉很有意思，真怕自己剩下的大学时间匆匆而过，结果什么也不会。大一没挂科马上大二，希望大二的时候能学到n1然后搞点好玩的，以后工作了就开始当社畜了，忏悔的地方就是感觉自己在大一上学期的时候跟个傻子一样天天上课玩手机，晚上熬夜不睡觉，希望以后能把那些想要的东西学的稍懂一些
🗿5❤1
Signed シスター
我心里总觉得为什么要对互联网上自述有抑郁症的人恶语相向呢装抑郁的人很多本质也是渴求得到关注。我们又怎么能确定谁是真的谁是装的嘲笑质疑让人去死有时候说不定真的会摧毁一个人最后一点希望。无论是真的是假的给一点安慰哪怕就是发一个电子的抱抱是真抑郁再好不过了，是假抑郁也能给想要得到关注的人以安慰 为什么不呢
👍15
Signed シスター
我是个大学刚毕业的独居男人。 离家远，城市里没有任何同学或熟人。每天，从下班后走在回家的路上，一直到睡觉的这段时间里，我都感觉整个人有一种坠入深渊的剧烈心慌。手脚冰凉、窒息、呼吸困难，感觉和世界都脱离了联系，去查了点资料，貌似是叫“客体恒常性”缺失，想治疗挺难的。症状是一旦周围没有人的气息，立马就陷入急性孤独，难以缓解。 一直在找解决办法，联系朋友吧，毕竟也不可能不间断地去烦别人，闲聊几句，结束后情绪又落回原点。泡酒吧、逛商场吧，当时能缓解，一回家关门，马上就被黑暗包围。 所以我在想，什么办法能保证任何时候都能感受到人的气息?一段时间后想到了一个，违反道德的做法——在某异性交友平台（不说名字，不是广告）上面，搞一个女号，然后用AI洗一些网图，做出了一个不细看就发现不了问题的脸，以及一连串的伪造的生活照。颜值还行、身材很好、开朗温柔的一个完全不存在的年轻女孩。 我很快就发现，这个办法是行得通的，没有一个人认出这是AI。再加上发照片…
👍15❤4👎2
Signed シスター
兄弟们，我今年大二，和女朋友已经谈了一年了，但是她一直没有和家里面提过我，谈恋爱的事情也躲着家里人，我之前提出想和她去旅游或者暑假去她家乡找她也被拒绝了，她说她是柏拉图的类型，拒绝婚前发生性行为，但是我感觉我是那种欲望很强烈的那种人，所以经常和她提出想到外面过夜，都被拒绝或者骂了。一到暑假异地两人生活作息不同就很少交流。最近出来兼职的时候遇到了一个女生，身高 180，目测有D，而且身材非常哇塞，最近一直在向我示好而且有暧昧倾向，还一直在约我出去溜溜，我去了之后，感觉两人就像是情侣一样，一起逛街一起吃饭，甚至一起喝同一杯饮料，现在内心好煎熬，特别想约第二个女生出来开房，但是又怕女朋友会发现，这种状态下感觉自己和失了智一样，现在天天道德在打架，我该怎么办
👍13🐳6❤1😭1
Signed シスター
劝大家不要去碰那些大多原生家庭缺爱的人，本人亲身领教过，她往往带着内心深处未被填补的缺口，最后不会和任何人有结果。千万别想着自己能成为谁的救赎，也别期待靠持续的付出迁就包容就能感动对方、能让他们慢慢改变，其实只不过是你自己一点一点不断消耗着自己，直到被彻底耗尽。 可能即便你曾倾尽了全部，对她各种无微不至，过往有再多甜蜜的回忆，但在她选择抽身要走时也都会一笔勾销，说放弃就马上放弃，就好像这一切都从未发生过。这类人不懂如何爱人，也未曾被好好爱过，内心缺乏极度的安全感，他们的世界里习惯了仅顾自己，没办法坚定地选择任何一个人、一段关系。 对感情里的瑕疵格外敏感，难以容忍对方的些许过错，遇到矛盾时不会想着共同解决，要么下意识回避、用冷暴力应对，等着对方一次又一次地妥协来确认爱意，要么干脆推开彼此，不顾及你的任何感受与委屈。 你以为的倾心付出，在她眼里或许就是理所当然，你始终在迁就她的情绪、包容她的不安，却从未被理解心疼，他们更不会反思自己…
👍11❤8
Signed シスター
这是一个求助帖 本人学的生物工程专业，对口的工作在远郊的厂子，天津基本上都要两班倒生产普工，稍微有点含量的qa和工艺已经没位置了，在滨海新区那边，坐地铁两个小时，然后我就找北京以及江苏南京方面的工作，结果被家里以北京生活成本太高和南方不好扎根，反正各种理由拒绝 问他们有什么法，三句不离地铁安检，说离家近，也管饭。 所以我想了个中和的办法，我自己当保安也干了两个月，有点小积蓄，让家里也凑点，自己学个技术去，不知道大家有推荐的吗？我真没招了。。。
💔10🤣4❤2😇1
Signed シスター
很烦，本人是一名大一学生，出来打暑假工，十二个小时九十块钱的打杂工作，干了一天走了，结果店长表示不给工资自己走，一说去维权，就急了，说我没提交书面离职申请，算旷工，到时候去劳动仲裁我找我的麻烦，说让我维权他不怕，投了劳动线索纠察，打了12345，去了劳动监察局，压根没作用，监察局和这店长协商，他说可以给我工资，但是有条件要给我交一个月社保，自己也不懂，之前看到说交社保就会没有应届生身份，监察局也一直劝说算了算了，就签了笔录撤销了，结果一回来，这店长还要找我的麻烦，说要给我交社保，就是要搞我，把我的应届生身份弄掉，还要劳动仲裁我再起诉我，要我赔偿他们的损失，说我无辜旷工造成他们巨大损失全要我来承担，说以后看哪个企业敢要我这个有记录的，为此事我还专门去咨询了专业律师，得到的答复是不影响，这店长纯纯在吓人，还说我是个什么东西，真的越想越气，在网上也刷到那种为了工资把老板捅了的事情，感觉自己有点冲动的欲望，但是我还有家人，不敢去做，但是…
🤣17❤8🤯6👍2
Signed シスター
#互推 【书籍分享】电子书资源分享 📚 【二次元美图】公诸同好 | 二次元美图分享 🅥 【软件分享】TK集库 【小红书分享】小红薯抽象观察 【音声&涩涩】永不消逝的音声 【科技分享】折腾啥 【安卓黄游】安卓黄油の领域（转世重生ver）❤️ 【小说分享】日更100 刺猬猫菠萝包起点飞卢小说有声书txt分享 【心声树洞】赛博忏悔室 Powered by @Summer_Clear_Sky_Bot
❤2
Signed 冬の素雪
我和我的女朋友是在大三谈恋爱的，到现在也有八九年了，然后我们是在2025年结的婚。然后在结婚大概三五个月之后，有一次在她打lol排位后因为遇到很坑的队友之后很想向我倾诉，但是我拒绝了说你不要跟我讲这个，我接不住，你不适合打排位为什么还要一直打呢。因为她遇到这种情况就很暴躁，之前跟她双排过一段时间我们很容易吵架，所以我就不玩排位了。然后她自己玩又差不多五把有四把就是这样一直在输出负面情绪，我自己也很难消化。然后后面她自己打遇到了一个夸她辅助打的好的但是id很女性化的队友，就加游戏好友了，后面发现是一个男的但是她也没有删掉，我就说加游戏好友就可以了，不要加微信。但是后面她还是偷偷加了被我发现后哭着认错。 后面她又打游戏认识了一个女生又间接认识了几个男生，然后这个女生拉了个群给他们都加进去了（我不清楚是不是为了规避我说的不要加好友的原因）。然后这次被我发现，她就提到之前她打输了给我倾诉我那样对她的事情，说了一些我也很想让你融入他们…
👎20❤10🤣5🐳3🤯1
Signed シスター
我结婚五年了，我从未真正喜欢自己的老婆。我当初喜欢的是他的表哥，至今我和他两个人一直偷偷在一起。 在别人的眼睛里我们还是是一个幸福的家庭吧，还是有人羡慕我们的，两边家庭也相处合适，女儿也很乖，我们准备要二胎了。 我的老婆从未怀疑过我。当然了——我和她在一起这么久自然也是有感情，但不是真正的爱情。她有时候挺烦的，但也确实是一个好老婆和负责的妈妈。 我今年35岁，我已经快承受不住了。这个社会逐渐放开了对我们这个群体的看法与偏见，年轻的gay已经甚至连形婚都不再考虑。越是这样，我越来越不敢和任何人坦白这件事，我甚至不敢和她表哥聊这件事。 我意识到一件事，当初和男朋友在一起，并选择娶了她的表妹结婚，不仅伤害自己的老婆，自己的男友，还伤害了这个家庭——两个家庭。 所以，我有罪。我当然知道怎么样处理这件事才是正确的，但是我实在是个怂货。我没有胆量跟任何人讲，我没有胆量去伤害两个真心爱我的人。我和男友偷偷在一起的时候，我心里有时会真的煎熬。…
🤯104😨52👎22❤12🤨6
Signed シスター
补上文你们问的详细信息 我国内小学三年级还没读完就出国了 所以你看的累的话我先说句对不起，我没文化这也是我能尽力表达的意思了 正题 彩礼是双方父母都同意给才确定的 我给女方三金对戒和钻戒 女方给我回礼了33%三金重量的足金链子 彩礼两万欧元回礼一半 我目前也是不想要孩子，跟女方同个观点明年要(前提是有正常的性生活) 我也想有正常的恩爱关系 她确实也有让我抱，但十次的要求只有两三次同意 亲是只从订婚宴后就没亲过了 我母胎单身27年所以我玩飞机杯也跟她坦白了 最后两次跟我父母吵架她说她不是我的泄欲工具她是个人有自己的想法请不要把我父母的想法强加在她身上 她说她不是没有后路她也有家打不了回她自己哪里 那时我们两个就是真的结束了 我尽力使两边关系能稍微好一些但两边的想法完全是背道而驰 我因为处女情结的关系下我也一直在容忍她也在心平气和的跟她好好说那些是不对的 目前我还对她抱有一丝希望给她最后一个机会 以及我要是再重新找别人或许别人也看…
❤10
Signed シスター
兄弟们，我现在在人生婚姻的岔路口 我跟我未婚妻是通过媒婆认识的跨国恋 认识到现在两年 同居开始到现在半年了(女方搬来我这边) 我和她都是被双方父母逼婚的(不是一见钟情) 订婚宴已经摆完了 三金和彩礼也给了 是三金，财礼欧洲普遍彩礼 她大我一岁 她是基督教 我是无神论者 相识过程中也就牵牵手 她说她是基督教婚前洗礼前不能结合 直到订婚宴的时候才亲上(也就那一次) 订婚宴后同居开始后一个月去了游轮长线十天内双双破处也完成了我的处女情节(本来不报这个希望的) 从那次以后到现在就没有过性生活了 同居两个月后就一起去我父母开的店去上班了 上班了一个半月感情一直没什么进展我就跟她就商量我要不要出去上班多挣钱这样我也有点存款 但是周休只能一星期回来一次 她说好呀说不定还是小别三日胜新婚呢 然后我就出去上班到现在 而感情并没有什么进展 我问过女方为什么她说第一次把她弄疼了有心理阴影得给她时间做心理建设 我说那可以亲亲抱抱吧 她说不行我们得先慢慢…
❤13🖕6
Signed シスター
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @cyber_confessional. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 673,830 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“赛博忏悔室” (@cyber_confessional), 39,396 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyber_confessional.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.