居然没有一个「包子」的 emoji,这让我给「豆包推广」相关的 tab 添加 icon 时感到苦恼,在 👩🏻💼 和 🫘 之间拿不定主义 😂 by @Louiscard #大产品小细节
🙈8💊2🥱1

Channel
@jike_collection
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,634subscribers
+47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001325205364 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jike_collection |
| Description | 把即刻上最值得看的内容,搬到这里 ✨ X:x.com/jike_collection Created by @i5tar 🚫 不接广告 |
| Created | 9 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jike_collection |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 35,634 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 35,630 | +15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 35,615 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 35,605 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 35,603 | +16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 35,587 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 92,940 |
| Reactions total | 281 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
267 reactions across 25 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 65 | 24.3% | |
| 🤡 | 40 | 15.0% | |
| 🤣 | 34 | 12.7% | |
| 👎 | 28 | 10.5% | |
| 😨 | 25 | 9.36% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 8.24% | |
| 💩 | 11 | 4.12% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 3.75% | |
| 🙈 | 8 | 3.00% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 1.50% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.375% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.375% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.375% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jike_collection. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
居然没有一个「包子」的 emoji,这让我给「豆包推广」相关的 tab 添加 icon 时感到苦恼,在 👩🏻💼 和 🫘 之间拿不定主义 😂 by @Louiscard #大产品小细节
🙈8💊2🥱1
在旧金山有一家咖啡馆,科技创业公司可以付费为饮料打上品牌......但你仍然需要付费,有点意思 by @JohnTian #大产品小细节
2026年8月12日 🌍资讯快读 1、国产大飞机C919将于明日首次执行国际商业航班 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14902981.html 2、豆包刘星:“豆包推荐酒店要收费”说法不准确,还处在早期探索 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14902715.html 3、山西省文物局回应“明城墙遭拆旧建新” https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33758609 4、武汉市民政局通报“男子遗体滞留太平间十二年” https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33759939 👬即刻镇小报 1、来到了电脑壁纸的地方📍 https://m.okjike.com/originalPosts/6a7ab63268e132d72dea20e5 2、平台从未消失过 https://m.o…
推荐瑞·达利欧最新一期深度访谈,信息量巨大。 这期节目刚上线不到两周,播放量已经破400万。 当然,这期访谈能火,很大一部分原因还是瑞·达利欧本人。 他是全球最大的对冲基金之一的桥水基金创始人,累计给投资者赚了大约530亿美元。 但真正让达利欧出名的,是2008年那场全球金融危机。 当时标普500暴跌将近40%的时候,大量投资机构损失惨重,他的基金反而赚了9.5%。更早之前,他就警告过度借贷可能引发系统性危机。 也正因为这样,当他在这次访谈里说,AI已经出现了经典的泡沫特征,很多人的第一反应不是反驳,是想知道他究竟看到了什么。 但整场访谈听下来,我觉得最重要的,是他全程反复提到的一条线索: AI正在改变财富的流向。 1 访谈一开始,主持人问达利欧,我们是不是正处在一个AI泡沫里? 达利欧没有急着给出一个涨跌判断,而是先讲了20世纪20年代的故事。 那是一个技术爆发的年代,汽车开始普及,普通家庭第一次用上电灯和冰…
👍5❤1
历代存诗总量TOP5 乾隆(清):43630 首,历史总量第一 陆游(南宋):9393 首 刘克庄(南宋):4823 首 杨万里(南宋):4244 首 白居易(唐):3840 首 by @帝都钢铁美少女 #无用但有趣的冷知识
💩3🔥1
2026年8月11日 🌍资讯快读 1、第38届大众电影百花奖揭晓 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14902262.html 2、特朗普称正在“低调处理”伊朗问题 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14896486.html 3、武汉警方通报城管协管员与摊主发生冲突:3名协管员被刑拘 https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33750449 4、演员秦焰因病去世,曾出演《狂飙》《我爱我家》等 https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33752223 👬即刻镇小报 1、石板路与雕塑,整座城市都是露天博物馆 https://m.okjike.com/originalPosts/6a79adbbbd0563695b704191 2、漫步在阿尔卑斯山脚下 https://m.okji…
去养老院看奶奶,一堆爷爷奶奶白天都会聚在客厅沙发上看电视,放的基本都是抗日神剧之类的。 我头一次发现,养老院的电视是特殊配置过的,中间会植入超长广告,基本都是请脸熟的过气明星站台推销保健品,现在也有针对老年人的ai知识付费什么的。 由于养老院的电视是独立不联网的,不会受到平台监管,在这里可以大肆虚假宣传,想想真的可怕,目标受众是一堆极其容易受骗的老年人,天天在他们唯一接触的屏幕上轮番话术洗脑,有关部门真的应该介入管一管…… by @臀总 #你不知道的行业内幕
😨25🥱2❤1🙊1
2026年8月10日 🌍资讯快读 1、“白海豚”已减弱为强热带风暴 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14896401.html 2、战时日本多所大学进行输血人体实验,向患者注射动物血 https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33748107 3、浙江省甬江发生2026年第1号洪水 https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33749537 4、伊朗最高领袖与总统会谈 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14896125.html 👬即刻镇小报 1、30+人士让自己身体延缓衰老的几个做法 https://m.okjike.com/originalPosts/6a788d0f141b85b292dde2c6 2、罗马的每一块石头都在讲述活着的故事 https://m.okjike.c…
❤1
2026年8月9日 🌍资讯快读 1、国家网信办就《大型个人信息处理者个人信息保护规定(征求意见稿)》公开征求意见 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14891315.html 2、河南回应带薪错峰休假通知引争议:程序审签不规范,待修改后予以印发 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14890917.html泸溪河发布“桃酥出现金属牙冠” 3、事件调查结论:相关视频情况不属实 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14889615.html 4、受台风“白海豚”影响上海两大机场近六成航班调减取消 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14895241.html 👬即刻镇小报 1、第一次来成都办活动,谢谢各位创作者 https://m.okjike.com/originalPosts/6a775887756bbb6658f…
❤1
“大陆一般拿六月第三个星期日作为父亲节,是源自美国的西洋父亲节。台湾过的八月八日父亲节,则取「八八」近「爸爸」的谐音,并以「八八」的汉字形象结合起来,正好就是「父」字的寓意。 因为「八八」父亲节最早设立的目的,是由1945年上海各界的爱国人士发起,缅怀在对日抗战中牺牲的中国父亲。台湾继承这样一个节日,是饱含近现代历史意涵的「中国父亲节」。” by @听小骨 #无用但有趣的冷知识
🤡10❤4🤔4
The Information发了一篇万字长文,深扒了Anthropic创始人达里奥·阿莫代伊是怎么以强烈的个人意志——甚至可以说是被神格化了——凌驾于所有AI大厂以上的,爆料密度很高,过于抽象的也不少。 我来总结一些重点内容: - 因为担心自己工作被抢、数据中心推高电价等种种原因,美国人对于AI的厌恶再创新高,而作为最强AI公司领导者的阿莫代伊,却坚持继续推动他所相信的「AI威胁论」,哪怕这会损害Anthropic的融资前景; - 董事会里有人建议Anthropic多宣传AI在攻克癌症方面的帮助,这是很常见的公关做法,但阿莫代伊拒绝了这一提议,认为不应该掩饰AI给人类造成的生存威胁,然后他转头就安排发布了一则意义不明的品牌广告,以墓碑、乞丐和奴工为开场元素,极其黑暗悲观,毫不意外的被骂翻了; - 因为Anthropic正在运作上市,投资者都在设法给阿莫代伊施加压力,希望他停止宣扬AI有害论,比较委婉的会恳求他「别再吓唬…
❤9🤣8💩1🥱1
2026年8月8日 🌍资讯快读 1、河南公安机关查实“三支一扶”招募笔试存在组织作弊犯罪行为 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14891559.html 2、东航发布新规: 提前14天可免费退改签 https://www.jiemian.com/article/14891321.html 3、泸溪河发布“桃酥现金属牙冠”调查结论,称消费者已澄清所发视频不属实 https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33736078 4、利用未成年人喊网友“爸爸”博流量,多个主播账号被封禁 https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33737072 👬即刻镇小报 1、你似乎要跟妈妈和解了 https://m.okjike.com/originalPosts/6a75985cbd0563695b06a765 2、如何才能真正具…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @jike_collection. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 617,558 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jike_collection named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“即刻精选” (@jike_collection), 35,634 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jike_collection.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.