【专家看特习会成果:中方视为“巨大外交成功”】 特习会落幕后,各界陆续就峰会成果及其对美中关系的影响作出评估。史汀生中心中国项目主任孙韵认为,中方无疑将习近平此次访美视为一次“巨大的成功”,她指出,随着美中高层对双边关系作出较为积极的定调,中方在芬太尼以及两军沟通等长期受美方关注的问题上,已经展现出更多行动与合作意愿。 更多:voachinese.com
❤1

Channel
@voachinese
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,696subscribers
+163 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001639726765 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @voachinese |
| Description | 美国之音中文网 您可靠的信息来源 - 通晓美中大事 锁定美国之音 美国之音中文网 VOAChinese.com X.com/voachinese YouTube.com/voachinese Facebook.com/voachinese Instagram.com/voachinese |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/voachinese |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 34,696 | +14 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 34,682 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 34,684 | +25 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 34,659 | +15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 34,644 | +10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 34,634 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 34,644 | +8 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 34,636 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 34,629 | +12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:34 | 34,617 | +15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 34,602 | +10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 34,592 | +11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 34,581 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 34,576 | +35 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 34,541 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 34,534 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 34,527 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 34,537 | -19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 34,556 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 34,559 | first reading |
632 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 124 of 320 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 632 (6 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 196,872 |
| Reactions total | 204 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 06:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 300 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
448 reactions across 211 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 192 | 42.9% | |
| 👍 | 158 | 35.3% | |
| 🤣 | 50 | 11.2% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 2.90% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 2.23% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.893% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.893% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.446% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.446% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.446% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.223% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.223% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 251 of the 632 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 632 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【专家看特习会成果:中方视为“巨大外交成功”】 特习会落幕后,各界陆续就峰会成果及其对美中关系的影响作出评估。史汀生中心中国项目主任孙韵认为,中方无疑将习近平此次访美视为一次“巨大的成功”,她指出,随着美中高层对双边关系作出较为积极的定调,中方在芬太尼以及两军沟通等长期受美方关注的问题上,已经展现出更多行动与合作意愿。 更多:voachinese.com
❤1
【特朗普总统宣布美国史上最大钢铁厂计划】 特朗普总统9月28日在白宫宣布,梅萨比金属公司(Mesabi Metallics)计划在艾奥瓦州投资约150亿美元,建设一座预计将成为美国历史上同类规模最大的钢铁厂。特朗普总统表示,他的政府对进口钢铁加征关税,推动了这项投资,表示美国钢铁产业正“重新焕发生机”。 更多内容:www.voachinese.com
❤1🤣1
世界瞩目的特习会结束后,双方的联合声明并未提及台湾,显示重点仍放在经贸谈判。而随着特习会落幕,美国对台军售是否重启、台湾总统赖清德是否过境美国、中美未来互动温度,则是外界观察重点。 更多内容👉 https://www.voachinese.com
VOA今日焦点 (2026年9月29日) 特朗普总统否认曾问习近平 是否有意购买美国武器 2026年9月29日《#VOA今日焦点》重点新闻内容包括:特朗普总统:美伊预计本周举行更多会谈,冲突将很快结束;美中公布600亿美元降税清单,贸易休战延至明年1月;特朗普总统亲自回应“曾问习近平是否购买美国武器”一事;美国国务院与台湾官员在美中峰会结束后强调美国对台政策不变;美中峰会结束后,特朗普总统与白宫在社媒平台上发布反共影片;英国美军基地险遭恐袭,特朗普总统称嫌犯欲“造成重大破坏”;美中重启“熊猫外交” “平平”、“福双”抵亚特兰大。 点击收看👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrcxYRWDNio
❤1
英文字里行间with温乐狄: Hang over Hang over是一个很实用的说法,想象有个东西一直悬在你头上,像阴影一样笼罩着。 那么Hang over能用在哪些地方?又该怎么用? 一分钟,温乐狄带你学会一个地道的英语表达。 更多内容👉 https://voachinese.com
❤1
【赖清德主持台湾新无人机测试棚厂启用:推动台湾成为无人机民主供应链亚洲中心】 在北京当局正不断加大对台湾的外交及军事压力,台湾面临的国际安全环境也变得更加复杂之际,台湾总统赖清德说,台湾与民主伙伴深化合作,打造一个更安全、更具韧性的无人机供应链,为印太地区和平稳定提供更坚实的支撑。 赖清德星期一(9月28日)前往台湾南部嘉义地区主持国防部研究机构——中山科学研究院位于民雄的无人机新测试场启用仪式。他说,无人系统已成为现代防卫重要战力,台湾必须深化与民主伙伴合作,打造更安全、更有韧性的无人机供应链,他将致力于推动让台湾成为亚洲无人机的民主供应链中心。 ...... 点击阅读完整报道👉 https://www.voachinese.com/a/8205439.html
❤2
【在一连串黑客攻击事件后,英伟达推出工具,可在“几毫秒内”阻止恶意AI代理】 美国芯片制造商英伟达(Nvidia)星期一(9月28日)发布了一款安全平台,称该平台能够阻止人工智能代理失控。此前,多家领先的人工智能公司披露,他们的系统曾侵入其它组织。 开放代理安全平台(Open Agent Safety Platform)主要由两部分组成。OpenShell 是一款开源软件,英伟达于今年 3 月首次公布,目前已广泛开放使用。它为人工智能智能体的行为设定边界,并在运行过程中追踪其行为。Sentry 运行在英伟达的一款独立芯片(称为数据处理单元)上,独立监控代理行为。 ...... 点击阅读完整报道👉 https://www.voachinese.com/a/8205446.html
国际刑警组织(INTERPOL)11月30日将在香港召开大会,选举负责裁决“红色通报“的档案控制委员会所有成员。分析人士担心,中国可能借主办大会的机会,为自己长期以来利用国际刑警组织来追查政治目标的作法和声誉“洗白”。更多内容:https://voachinese.com/amp/8205341.html
【特朗普总统表示他并未与习近平讨论向北京出售武器的可能】 唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)总统星期一(9月28日)说,他在上星期的美中峰会期间并没有与中国领导人习近平讨论向中国出售武器的可能性。美国驻华大使庞德伟(David Perdue)星期日在接受电视台采访时曾说,特朗普总统曾询问习近平是否有兴趣购买美国武器,美国政府随后澄清美国并无向中国出售武器的计划。 星期一,特朗普总统在白宫椭圆形办公室举行的一次活动中被记者问到,庞德伟大使在接受福克斯新闻星期天(Fox News Sunday)节目的采访时说,特朗普曾示意美国将向中国出售军事装备,这种说法是否准确?他是否提出这样的建议? ...... 点击阅读完整报道👉 https://www.voachinese.com/a/8205437.html
❤1
【G20贸易部长会议将聚焦强迫劳动与产能过剩等议题】 美国贸易代表办公室(USTR)表示,二十国集团(G20)贸易部长级会议定于星期二(9月29日)至星期四(10月1日)在美国威斯康辛州的密尔沃基市举行。美国贸易代表贾米森·格里尔(Jamieson Greer)将主持会议,与G20成员经济体代表就全球贸易体系面临的多项问题展开讨论。 根据美国贸易代表办公室9月25日的声明,部长们将就一系列广泛的议题进行讨论,包括包括消除全球供应链中的强迫劳动、更新最惠国待遇(MFN)原则、谴责将粮食贸易“武器化“以及应对结构性产能过剩和生产过剩问题等。 ...... 点击阅读完整报道👉 https://www.voachinese.com/a/8205375.html
❤1
中国送往美国的两只大熊猫平平和福双在结束16小时飞行后,于9月27日抵达美国亚特兰大。此次熊猫赴美正值两国元首峰会结束之际,它们的到来也成为外界关注的焦点之一。两只熊猫目前已转运至亚特兰大动物园,将进行为期一个月的常规检疫隔离,正式与公众见面的日期将于之后公布。 更多内容👉 https://www.voachinese.com
【国际刑警组织将于香港召开大会 英国律师警告中国可能借机“洗白”声誉】 国际刑警组织(INTERPOL)第94届全体大会将于11月30日至12月3日在香港举行。中国长期以来被指利用国际刑警组织追查政治目标,分析人士担心,中国可能借主办大会的机会,为自己的形象“洗白”。 “根据我们的经验,中国是滥用国际刑警组织规则最老练的国家之一”,英国上级审裁院移民和庇护庭副法官本·基思(Ben Keith)和在伦敦及海牙执业的大律师里斯·戴维斯(Rhys Davies)对美国之音表示。 ...... 点击阅读完整报道👉 https://www.voachinese.com/a/8205341.html
Showing the 12 most recent of 632 posts we hold for @voachinese. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@voachinese edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@voachinese named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“美国之音” (@voachinese), 34,696 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voachinese.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.