身在局中不知局。 倘若SuperMicro当初跟老黄一起把AI的生意做大,赚的钱怕是十倍于走私显卡给中国。 而政策创造出来的价差一定会有人搬砖,哪怕不是SuperMicro也会有更统治阶级的人搬。 倘若不是当初愚蠢的芯片封禁政策,恐怕中国的产业链也不会发展得如此迅速且不计代价。 台湾要重启核二核三了,从三里岛后就停止的美国新增核电又要开始出栏了,欧洲的绿党和反核运动迎来了他的式微和终局。 AI的浪潮越来越真,世界又有增量了,那些公平式内耗又被嫌弃了,人类又走向追求效率做大蛋糕的一边了。 世界一定走向越来越好,自我们这代人成年起,地球online从没有如此好,而且越来越好。 当初玩着 GAN 生成二次元头像又有几人预见此刻?总是风起于青萍之末,也总是当局者迷,《如果早知道》。

Channel
真空中的球形猫。
@fermi_cat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
578subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001255929421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fermi_cat |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fermi_cat |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 578 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 579 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 579 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 22 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://t.me/tnews365/34572
到了玻利维亚旅游一趟之后: 我原本以为就是手机没网络几天,it turns out that 感谢妈妈把我生在一个有床有被子的国家。 景色好看是好看的,羊驼有四种,满街社会主义核心价值观或者MAGA旗/巴勒斯坦旗大约也好过到处都是耶稣和圣母玛利亚,生在这里的人应该义无反顾地搭上中美洲大篷车非移去美国打工
W-2 job is a paid training. https://fixupx.com/hazenlee_/status/1979833502716875064?s=46
版本答案 https://x.com/myhongkongdoll/status/1978332242230325301?s=52
I’m turning 41, but I don’t feel like celebrating. Our generation is running out of time to save the free Internet built for us by our fathers. What was once the promise of the free exchange of information is being turned into the ultimate tool of control. Once-free countries are introducing dystopian measures such as digital IDs (UK), online age checks (Australia), and mass scanning of private messages (EU). Ger…
币圈对中国90后最是温情的。 哪怕没在币圈赚到钱,入圈的90后也大都躲避了2016-2024年中国房地产这一人类历史上最大的镰刀。 想来也对,币圈的骗局再肮脏,能有比烂尾楼脏吗😂
减少乃至取消 OPT 甚至关闭 super excessive 大学都是一定会发生的,跟总统是否反移民关系不大。 无非是反移民的总统吃相差一点,民粹的总统行事作风嘲讽度高一点。 大的题目在于: 1. 1980年代以来的信息技术革命带来的全要素生产率是否走到了尽头? 1.1 AI 是否开启新的全要素生产率增长曲线?AI 应用端的利润能兑现吗? 2. 1980年代以来的 中国制造/离岸公司/非法移民/俄罗斯油所带来的低通胀环境进而产生的低利率、低实际税率环境,看起来已经彻底消失了。再通胀 is not a question about whether, but when. 于无声处有替代品吗?有什么全新的要素出现吗?
亚细亚的孤儿,真的掌握不了一点点自己的命运。 下跪都得是最彻底的那个。
很多大家以为长久如此的东西其实并不然。 比如上世纪末本世纪初,黄金承载的经济价值严重变弱,全球化下人们普遍收入快速上涨,黄金价格只能跌,甚至,一度黄金克价比铂金还低。 其结果是,各种航司酒店的常旅客计划里,往往Platinum的级别甚至高于Gold。 现在铂金克价不到黄金的1/3,我们来猜猜、这些看似“长久存在”的商业会员计划,什么时候要改?
I can see #China2035 from my house https://fixupx.com/theeconomist/status/1907756145185361981?s=46
任何人都需要非对称的博弈优势机会才能翻身。 时刻更新自己为潜在的机会做准备,抓住机遇后以绝对强的执行力去执行他。 聪明又强大。
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fermi_cat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“真空中的球形猫。” (@fermi_cat), 578 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fermi_cat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.