Channel
@alreadyfamous
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,906subscribers
-87 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001755803524 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alreadyfamous |
| Description | Новые идеи для гардероба и жизни. Здесь мы разбираемся в стиле, моде и создаем тренды. Для сотрудничества писать @Irisa_tg. Страница включена в перечень РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673229a46b493b723ca2d8ad®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | 30 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alreadyfamous |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 26,906 | -18 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 26,924 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 26,934 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 26,942 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 26,952 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 26,967 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 26,981 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 26,990 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 26,993 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:09 | 26,993 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
173 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 109 | 63.0% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 30.6% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 5.78% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.578% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Извините, что я пропадала 🤍 На самом деле у меня была какая-то очень важная пауза. Время просто остановиться, посидеть и подумать: а чего вообще хочется от жизни? Как вы знаете, мы переехали в Европу год назад. И за этот год я поняла одну важную вещь — иногда нужно оказаться не совсем в «своём» месте, чтобы наконец услышать себя. Мне очень не хватало темпа жизни, энергии, ощущения движения вокруг. Но знаете, я оче…
❤56🔥24😢1
В последнее время постоянно смотрю на свадебные приглашения и понимаю, какие же они сейчас красивые. Девочки, там столько идей…. тиснение, ручная роспись, кружево, необычные формы, свои логотипы. И, кстати, самые дерзкие идеи сейчас можно подсматривать у приглашений на фэшн-показы. Там всегда самые интересные материалы, нестандартные форматы и очень продуманная подача.
🔥29❤12👍1
У кого скоро свадьба, намечается юбилей или девичник? 💫 Я собрала просто нереальное количество идей для пригласительных 💕✨ Поделиться?
❤17
Dior вообще находится в своей prime era✨ Посмотрите на делали из показа Autumn Winter 2026-2027
❤24👍9
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @alreadyfamous. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 527,620 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Already Famous” (@alreadyfamous), 26,906 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alreadyfamous.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.