Channel

time vs. vogue

@time_vs_vogue

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

33,630subscribers

+164 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001381297031
Type	Channel
Username	@time_vs_vogue
Created	24 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded	13 August 2026
Last confirmed live	15 August 2026
Measurements held	11
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/time_vs_vogue

Growth

11 measurements spanning 9 days, net +164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,441–33,655 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
15 Aug 2026, 16:48	33,630	+22
14 Aug 2026, 06:38	33,608	+17
13 Aug 2026, 19:36	33,591	no change
13 Aug 2026, 00:52	33,591	+28
12 Aug 2026, 02:14	33,563	+9
11 Aug 2026, 02:42	33,554	+22
10 Aug 2026, 03:41	33,532	+27
9 Aug 2026, 02:51	33,505	+6
8 Aug 2026, 01:54	33,499	+14
7 Aug 2026, 01:33	33,485	+19
6 Aug 2026, 09:47	33,466	first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 14 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 436,576 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

TVOYA YOYO
@vaskwer · 871 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“time vs. vogue” (@time_vs_vogue), 33,630 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/time_vs_vogue.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.